migration of People.test.tsx from jest to vitest #2661
Conversation
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on migrating the testing infrastructure for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (2)vitest.config.ts (2)src/setupTests.ts (1)🔇 Additional comments (7)vitest.config.ts (1)
The inclusion of both Let's verify no test files are missed: ✅ Verification successfulLGTM: Test pattern inclusion is correct and comprehensive The verification confirms that the test pattern inclusion in vitest.config.ts correctly matches all test files in the codebase. The pattern
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any test files that might be missed
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js | grep -E '(\.test\.|\.spec\.)'
Length of output: 11253 src/setupTests.ts (3)
The migration from Jest to Vitest imports and global fetch mock is correct. Also applies to: 8-8
The test timeout configuration has been correctly migrated to use Vitest's API.
The JestPreview configuration has been commented out. Consider investigating if there's a Vitest-compatible alternative for test previewing functionality. src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx (3)
The migration to Vitest imports and router mocking implementation is correct. Also applies to: 116-122
All test cases have been correctly migrated from Also applies to: 157-157, 179-179, 205-205
The matchMedia mock has been correctly updated to use Vitest's mocking API. Let's verify test coverage hasn't decreased: ✅ Verification successfulLet me check the test coverage for these conditionals by examining the test file. Test coverage is comprehensive for all conditionals The test file shows complete coverage of all identified conditionals:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any untested code paths in People component
rg "^(\s*)(if|switch|for|while)" src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx | while read -r line; do
echo "Potential conditional that needs test coverage: $line"
done
Length of output: 854 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage for the identified conditionals
echo "=== People.test.tsx content ==="
cat src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx
echo -e "\n=== People.tsx content around conditionals ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "^(\s*)(if|switch|for|while)" src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx
Length of output: 6923 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@nadeemnagarji Please fix the failed tests. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactor
Issue Number:
Fixes #2576
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
Migrating the tests of People.tsx Component from jest to vitest
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Refactor