Add tests for 100% coverage of src/resolvers/User/posts.ts #2417
Conversation
- Updated the `graphql` dependency in `package.json` from version `^16.8.1` to `^16.9.0` - Regenerated `package-lock.json` to reflect the changes in dependencies This change addresses issue PalisadoesFoundation#2382 by ensuring compatibility with the latest features and bug fixes in the `graphql` package. Closes PalisadoesFoundation#2382
- Implemented comprehensive test cases for `posts.ts` to ensure 100% code coverage. - Added tests for various pagination arguments (`first`, `last`, `before`, `after`). - Included edge cases for no posts and invalid filters. - Verified error handling for invalid arguments and cursor values. Fixes PalisadoesFoundation#1928
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the test suite for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Resolver
participant Database
User->>Resolver: Request user posts
Resolver->>Database: Fetch posts for user
alt No posts found
Database-->>Resolver: Return empty posts
Resolver-->>User: Return empty connection object
else Posts found
Database-->>Resolver: Return list of posts
Resolver-->>User: Return posts with pagination info
end
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/User/post.spec.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
tests/resolvers/User/post.spec.ts (7)
Line range hint
44-55:
LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the error handling for invalid arguments in the
postResolver.
Line range hint
66-96:
LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the connection object returned by the
postResolverwith valid arguments.
98-109: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the empty connection object returned by the
postResolverwhen no posts are found.
111-137: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the pagination handling by the
postResolverwith different arguments.
Line range hint
139-151:
LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the error handling for invalid cursors in the
parseCursorfunction.
Line range hint
153-165:
LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the handling of valid cursors in the
parseCursorfunction.
169-181: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the error handling for invalid creatorId in the
parseCursorfunction.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2417 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.34% 98.35% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 353 353
Lines 27587 27587
Branches 2355 2365 +10
===========================================
+ Hits 27130 27134 +4
+ Misses 454 450 -4
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
varshith257
changed the title
|
- Update 'handles valid cursor value' test to be more flexible - Ensure test passes with variable post order - Maintain test coverage and functionality verification
…lawa-api into fix-issue-1928
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/User/post.spec.ts (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/resolvers/User/post.spec.ts
|
Greetings, I have updated the file to support 100% code coverage for src/resolvers/User/posts.ts
b.) by following the stated instructions, I went over codecov and I have attached the code coverage for the latest commit (f3b4372): 
Please go over it and let me know if I need to further refine this> |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Test update
Issue Number:
Fixes #1928
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Implemented comprehensive test cases for
posts.tsto ensure 100% code coverage. This includes the following:first,last,before,after).Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit