Updated chat schema #2466
Updated chat schema #2466
Conversation
…into chat-feature
…o reply-functionality
|
@disha1202 Please fix the conflicting files. It seems this is due to the PR I recently merged. I'll try to revert it. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (3)
17-18: LGTM: Test setup updated correctly, with a minor suggestion.The
beforeAllhook has been updated to usecreateTestChatMessageinstead ofcreateTestDirectChatMessage, which is consistent with the refactoring. The assignment totestChatMessageis correct, using the fourth element of the returned array.Consider destructuring the array for improved readability:
const [,,, testChatMessage] = await createTestChatMessage();This makes it clearer that we're intentionally using the fourth element of the returned array.
44-49: LGTM: Second test case updated correctly, with a minor suggestion.The second test case has been successfully updated to use
testChatMessageinstead oftestDirectChatMessage. Theparentobject is now correctly created fromtestChatMessage, maintaining the original test logic while adapting to the newChatMessagestructure.For consistency with the first test case, consider moving the null check for
parentbefore its usage:if (testChatMessage?._id) { const parent = testChatMessage.toObject(); if (!parent) { throw new Error("Parent object is undefined."); } parent._id = testChatMessage._id; parent.sender = new Types.ObjectId(); // Set to a non-existing ObjectId try { // ... rest of the test case } catch (error: unknown) { // ... error handling } }This change would make the error handling more consistent between the two test cases.
Also applies to: 51-53, 55-61
Line range hint
1-67: Overall consistency is good, with a minor suggestion for the describe block.The file has been successfully updated to reflect the change from
DirectChatMessagetoChatMessage. All references have been consistently updated, and the test logic has been preserved while adapting to the new structure.Update the describe block to reflect the new
ChatMessagestructure:describe("resolvers -> ChatMessage -> sender", () => { // ... existing test cases });This change would make the describe block consistent with the new
ChatMessagenaming convention used throughout the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for the
senderresolver has been updated to reflect the newChatMessagestructure, which is consistent with the refactoring fromDirectChatMessageto a more genericChatMessage.
7-8: LGTM: Test helper imports updated correctly.The imports for
TestChatMessageTypeandcreateTestChatMessagehave been updated to reflect the new chat message structure. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring fromDirectChatMessagetoChatMessage.
12-12: LGTM: Test variable declaration updated correctly.The test variable declaration has been updated from
testDirectChatMessagetotestChatMessage, with the corresponding type change toTestChatMessageType. This change aligns with the refactoring to a more genericChatMessagestructure.
27-27: LGTM: Test case updated correctly.The first test case has been updated to use
testChatMessageinstead oftestDirectChatMessage. Theparentobject is now correctly created fromtestChatMessage, and the user lookup usestestChatMessage.sender. These changes are consistent with the refactoring to a more genericChatMessagestructure while maintaining the original test logic.Also applies to: 34-34
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
eslint.config.mjs (1)
113-113: Unnecessary addition of@typescript-eslintplugin for GraphQL filesIn the configuration for
.graphqlfiles, the@typescript-eslintplugin has been added:plugins: { "@typescript-eslint": typescriptEslint, },Since
.graphqlfiles are not TypeScript files, including the@typescript-eslintplugin may be unnecessary and could lead to linting issues or confusion. Consider removing the@typescript-eslintplugin from this configuration to keep the linting process accurate and efficient.
eslint.config.mjs
Outdated
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| languageOptions: { | ||
| parser: parser, | ||
| parser: tsParser, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect parser specified for GraphQL files
The tsParser (TypeScript parser) is set as the parser for .graphql files:
languageOptions: {
parser: tsParser,
},Using tsParser for GraphQL files may not be appropriate because .graphql files are not written in TypeScript. This could result in parsing errors or incorrect linting results. Consider using a GraphQL-specific parser or removing the parser specification for this file type if it's not needed.
Apply this diff to correct the parser configuration:
languageOptions: {
- parser: tsParser,
},
|
|
Hi @palisadoes Updated the PR, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (3)
87-87: LGTM! Consider adding a description comment.The addition of the
createChatmutation aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating chat types. It provides a flexible approach to chat creation using the genericchatInputtype.Consider adding a brief description comment above the mutation to explain its purpose and usage, similar to other mutations in this file. For example:
# Creates a new chat (either direct or group) based on the provided input createChat(data: chatInput!): Chat
235-239: LGTM! Consider updating the mutation description.The modifications to the
sendMessageToChatmutation are well-aligned with the PR objectives:
- The addition of the optional
replyToparameter enables message threading.- The return type change to
ChatMessage!reflects the consolidated chat structure.Consider updating or adding a description comment for this mutation to reflect its expanded functionality. For example:
# Sends a message to a chat (direct or group) with optional reply functionality sendMessageToChat( chatId: ID! messageContent: String! replyTo: ID ): ChatMessage! @auth
Line range hint
1-339: Overall changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to the mutations in this file effectively implement the consolidation of chat types:
- Removal of separate direct and group chat mutations (
createDirectChat,removeDirectChat,removeGroupChat,sendMessageToDirectChat, etc.).- Introduction of a unified
createChatmutation.- Update of
sendMessageToChatto handle both direct and group chats with added reply functionality.These changes simplify the API and provide a more flexible approach to chat management. The new structure should make it easier to maintain and extend chat functionality in the future.
As the chat system evolves, consider the following:
- Ensure that the
chatInputtype is comprehensive enough to handle all chat creation scenarios.- Update related resolvers and services to properly handle the new unified chat structure.
- Review and update any client-side code that may be affected by these API changes.
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (2)
19-24: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new
chatInputtype effectively combines DirectChat and GroupChat functionalities, aligning well with the PR objectives. The structure is flexible and accommodates both direct and group chat scenarios.Consider adding a brief comment above the
chatInputtype to explain its dual purpose:""" Input type for creating or updating a chat, supporting both direct and group chats. """ input chatInput { # ... existing fields ... }This comment would enhance clarity for developers using this input type in the future.
Line range hint
26-30: Clarify the role ofcreateGroupChatInputor consider removing it.With the introduction of the new
chatInputtype that handles both direct and group chats, the presence ofcreateGroupChatInputmight lead to confusion and potential inconsistencies.Consider one of the following actions:
- If
createGroupChatInputis no longer in use, remove it to avoid confusion.- If it's still needed, add a comment explaining its specific use case and how it differs from
chatInput.- If it's meant to be deprecated, mark it as such and provide migration instructions to use
chatInputinstead.Example of deprecation:
""" @deprecated Use `chatInput` with `isGroup: true` instead. This input type will be removed in a future version. """ input createGroupChatInput { # ... existing fields ... }Clarifying or removing this input type will ensure consistency and prevent potential maintenance issues in the future.
src/constants.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1023: Consider refactoring constants for improved maintainability.While the addition of
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORis appropriate, I've noticed that this file contains a large number of constants. To improve maintainability and readability, consider the following suggestions:
- Group related constants into separate files (e.g.,
errorConstants.ts,configConstants.ts, etc.).- Use enums for related constant groups where applicable.
- Consider using a more structured approach for error constants, such as a class-based system that allows for easy internationalization and consistent error handling.
Here's an example of how you might start refactoring:
// errorConstants.ts export enum ErrorCode { NOT_FOUND = 'notFound', ALREADY_EXISTS = 'alreadyExists', UNAUTHORIZED = 'unauthorized', // ... other error codes } export class AppError { constructor( public code: ErrorCode, public message: string, public param: string ) {} static MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND = new AppError( ErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, 'Message not found', 'message' ); // ... other error constants } // Usage throw AppError.MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND;This approach would make the constants more maintainable and easier to use consistently throughout the application.
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
721-734: Make theadminsField Non-Nullable for Better Type SafetyThe
adminsfield is defined as[User], which allows the list or its elements to benull. If a chat should always have anadminslist (even if empty) and each admin should be a validUser, consider defining the field as[User!]!to enhance type safety and prevent potentialnullvalues.Apply this diff to update the field type:
admins: [User] +admins: [User!]!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- eslint.config.mjs (0 hunks)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (4 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (20 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- eslint.config.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-09-22T09:37:15.069Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning><retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning>
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (3)
25-25: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
createChatandsendMessageToChatimports, along with the removal of separate direct and group chat imports (not visible in the diff), aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating chat functionality. This change supports the transition to a unified Chat entity.Also applies to: 84-84
Line range hint
1-235: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to
src/resolvers/Mutation/index.tseffectively support the consolidation of chat functionality:
- Removal of separate direct and group chat imports and exports.
- Addition of unified
createChatandsendMessageToChatimports and exports.These changes are minimal, focused, and consistent with the PR objective of merging DirectChat and GroupChat into a single Chat entity. The file maintains its original purpose as a central point for mutation resolvers, reducing the risk of unintended side effects.
146-146: LGTM: Export changes support unified chat structure.The addition of
createChatandsendMessageToChatexports in theMutationobject, coupled with the removal of separate direct and group chat exports (not visible in the diff), effectively supports the new unified chat structure. This change is consistent with the PR objectives.To ensure all necessary chat-related mutations are accounted for, please run the following verification script:
Also applies to: 202-202
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Chat-related mutations are correctly updated.
The new mutations
createChatandsendMessageToChatare present in theMutationobject, and the old mutations have been successfully removed. This confirms that the export changes effectively support the unified chat structure as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all necessary chat-related mutations are present and no old mutations remain. # Test: Check for the presence of new chat mutations and absence of old ones echo "Checking for new chat mutations:" grep -n "createChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts echo "Checking for absence of old chat mutations:" grep -n "createDirectChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "createGroupChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToDirectChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToGroupChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.tsLength of output: 681
src/constants.ts (1)
67-72: LGTM! New error constant added for message not found scenario.The new
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant is well-structured and consistent with other error constants in the file. This addition aligns with the chat system updates mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure this new constant is being utilized correctly, please run the following script to check its usage in chat-related files:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete:
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORis properly utilized across relevant files.No issues found regarding the usage of the new error constant.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR in chat-related files # Search for MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR in all .ts files echo "Searching for MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR usage:" rg "MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR" --type ts # Search for potential spots where MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR should be used echo "\nPotential spots where MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR might be needed:" rg "message.*not.*found" --type tsLength of output: 1432
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
736-745: Clarify the Purpose and Usage of thedeletedByFieldThe
deletedByfield in theChatMessagetype is defined as[User], suggesting that multiple users can delete the same message independently, affecting their view of the chat. Please verify if the intended behavior is to support per-user message deletion (soft deletion) or global deletion.To confirm how
deletedByis used across the codebase, you can run the following script:This will help determine if the implementation aligns with the desired message deletion functionality.
schema.graphql (2)
193-206: Well-structured 'Chat' type with essential fieldsThe
Chattype is appropriately defined, including all necessary fields for chat functionality. The use of non-nullable types where necessary enhances data integrity.
1602-1602:⚠️ Potential issueAdd authentication directive to 'messageSentToChat' subscription
To secure the subscription and prevent unauthorized access to chat messages, include the
@authdirective.Apply this diff:
type Subscription { - messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage + messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage @auth ... }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
13-14: Imports for Chat Models Added CorrectlyThe new chat models
InterfaceChatandInterfaceChatMessageare imported appropriately.
265-279:ChatType Definition Aligns with Unified SchemaThe
Chattype is well-defined and reflects the consolidation of direct and group chats into a single entity.
281-291:ChatMessageType Defined AccuratelyThe
ChatMessagetype correctly represents messages within the unified chat structure.
3106-3109:ChatInputType Includes Necessary FieldsThe
ChatInputtype provides the required fields for creating both group and direct chats.
| type Chat { | ||
| _id: ID! | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| name: String | ||
| createdAt: DateTime! | ||
| creator: User | ||
| messages: [ChatMessage] | ||
| organization: Organization | ||
| updatedAt: DateTime! | ||
| users: [User!]! | ||
| admins: [User] | ||
| lastMessageId: String | ||
| image: String | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Consistent Use of ID Type for Identifiers
The lastMessageId field in the Chat type is currently defined as String. Since it represents an identifier for a message, consider changing its type to ID for consistency and clarity.
Apply this diff to update the field type:
lastMessageId: String
+lastMessageId: ID📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| name: String | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| lastMessageId: String | |
| image: String | |
| } | |
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| name: String | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| lastMessageId: ID | |
| image: String | |
| } |
| type ChatMessage { | ||
| _id: ID! | ||
| chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat! | ||
| createdAt: DateTime! | ||
| deletedBy: [User] | ||
| messageContent: String! | ||
| replyTo: ChatMessage | ||
| sender: User! | ||
| updatedAt: DateTime! | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a 'type' field to 'ChatMessage' for message categorization
Including a type field in the ChatMessage type can help categorize messages (e.g., TEXT, IMAGE, VIDEO). This enhances flexibility and allows clients to handle different message types appropriately.
Define the MessageType enum:
enum MessageType {
TEXT
IMAGE
VIDEO
FILE
}Update the ChatMessage type:
type ChatMessage {
_id: ID!
chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat!
createdAt: DateTime!
deletedBy: [User]
messageContent: String!
replyTo: ChatMessage
sender: User!
updatedAt: DateTime!
+ type: MessageType!
}| removeUserFromUserFamily(familyId: ID!, userId: ID!): UserFamily! | ||
| removeUserImage: User! | ||
| removeUserTag(id: ID!): UserTag | ||
| resetCommunity: Boolean! | ||
| revokeRefreshTokenForUser: Boolean! | ||
| saveFcmToken(token: String): Boolean! | ||
| sendMembershipRequest(organizationId: ID!): MembershipRequest! | ||
| sendMessageToDirectChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!): DirectChatMessage! | ||
| sendMessageToGroupChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!): GroupChatMessage! | ||
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include 'type' parameter in 'sendMessageToChat' mutation
Adding a type parameter to the sendMessageToChat mutation allows specifying the message type, aligning with the updated ChatMessage structure.
Update the mutation signature:
type Mutation {
- sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage!
+ sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: MessageType!): ChatMessage!
...
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage! | |
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: MessageType!): ChatMessage! |
| @@ -1500,12 +1467,11 @@ | |||
| agendaItemByEvent(relatedEventId: ID!): [AgendaItem] | |||
| agendaItemByOrganization(organizationId: ID!): [AgendaItem] | |||
| agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization(organizationId: ID!): [AgendaCategory] | |||
| chatById(id: ID!): Chat! | |||
| chatsByUserId(id: ID!): [Chat] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement pagination in 'chatsByUserId' query to enhance performance
Fetching all chats for a user at once can lead to performance bottlenecks, especially for users with many chats. Implementing pagination improves scalability and user experience.
Modify the chatsByUserId query:
type Query {
- chatsByUserId(id: ID!): [Chat]
+ chatsByUserId(id: ID!, first: Int, after: String): ChatConnection
...
}
+type ChatConnection {
+ edges: [ChatEdge]
+ pageInfo: PageInfo!
+}
+
+type ChatEdge {
+ cursor: String!
+ node: Chat
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| input chatInput { | ||
| image: String | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| name: String |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'organizationId' is required when 'isGroup' is true in 'chatInput'
For group chats associated with an organization, making organizationId mandatory when isGroup is true ensures data consistency and proper linkage.
Consider updating the chatInput definition:
input chatInput {
image: String
isGroup: Boolean!
name: String
- organizationId: ID
+ organizationId: ID # Consider making this non-nullable when isGroup is true
userIds: [ID!]!
}Implement validation logic to enforce this constraint during mutation processing.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
@disha1202 Please fix the conflicting files. |
…awa-api into schema-update
… into schema-update
disha1202
dismissed
DMills27’s stale review
The merge-base changed after approval.
|
Hi @DMills27 Fixed conflicting files. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2465
Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ChatandChatMessagestructure for improved chat functionality.createChatmutation to facilitate the creation of both direct and group chats.sendMessageToChatmutation for sending messages to any chat type.chatByIdandchatsByUserIdfor retrieving chat information.messageSentToChat.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores