Add support for Volunteer Leaderboard, linking Volunteer/Groups/Membership & Integrated with Action Items #2615
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the codebase, focusing on the integration of volunteer management features. Key changes include the addition of new types and fields in the GraphQL schema, modifications to existing models and resolvers, and the introduction of utility functions for user and volunteer checks. New mutations and queries for creating and retrieving volunteer memberships, as well as updates to action items, are implemented. Additionally, several test cases are added or modified to ensure the functionality and correctness of these new features. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (111)
src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteers.ts (2)
27-46:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd access control and optimize query performance.
Two important considerations:
- Access Control: Add checks to ensure the user has permission to view the event volunteers.
- Query Optimization: Consider adding field projection to limit the returned data.
Add access control:
export const getEventVolunteers: QueryResolvers["getEventVolunteers"] = async ( _parent, args, + context, ) => { + if (!context.user) { + throw new Error("You must be logged in to view event volunteers"); + }Optimize the query:
}) .populate("user", "-password") - .populate("event") + .populate("event", "title startDate endDate") - .populate("groups") + .populate("groups", "name") .populate({ path: "assignments", + select: "status completionDate", populate: { path: "actionItemCategory", + select: "name", }, })Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
48-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize name filtering and improve type safety.
The current implementation has two concerns:
- Performance: Name filtering is done in memory instead of at the database level
- Type Safety: Type assertions could be avoided with proper typing
Consider moving the name filtering to the database query:
- const volunteers = await EventVolunteer.find({ + let query = { event: eventId, ...(groupId && { groups: { $in: groupId, }, }), ...where, - }) + }; + + if (nameContains) { + query = { + ...query, + $expr: { + $regexMatch: { + input: { $concat: ["$user.firstName", " ", "$user.lastName"] }, + regex: nameContains, + options: "i" + } + } + }; + } + + const volunteers = await EventVolunteer.find(query)And improve type safety:
- const tempVolunteer = volunteer as InterfaceEventVolunteer; - const tempUser = tempVolunteer.user as InterfaceUser; + const { user } = volunteer; + if (!user || typeof user !== 'object') return false;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.ts (1)
2-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consolidating error constant handling into utility functions.
While the refactor to use utility functions improves code organization, the
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_INVITE_USER_MISTMATCHconstant could potentially be encapsulated within a utility function for consistent error handling across the codebase.-import { EVENT_VOLUNTEER_INVITE_USER_MISTMATCH } from "../../constants"; +import { checkEventVolunteerOwnership } from "../../utilities/checks";Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteers.spec.ts (1)
35-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing test coverage and type safety.
While the basic happy path cases are covered, there are several opportunities for improvement:
- The type casting could be more type-safe
- Missing test cases for error scenarios
- Assertions could be more comprehensive
Consider these improvements:
// 1. Better type casting const eventVolunteers = await getEventVolunteers?.( {}, { where: { eventId: testEvent?._id, name_contains: testUser1?.firstName, }, }, {}, ) as Promise<InterfaceEventVolunteer[]>; // 2. Additional test cases it('should handle invalid eventId', async () => { // Test with invalid ID }); it('should handle non-existent group', async () => { // Test with non-existent group }); // 3. More comprehensive assertions expect(eventVolunteers).toHaveLength(1); expect(eventVolunteers[0]).toMatchObject({ user: { firstName: testUser1?.firstName, // Add more user field assertions }, // Add more field assertions });Would you like me to help implement these improvements?
src/utilities/adminCheck.ts (1)
22-22:
⚠️ Potential issueUse primitive
booleantype instead ofBooleanFor consistency with TypeScript best practices, use the primitive
booleantype instead of theBooleanobject type.Apply this change:
-): Promise<Boolean> => { +): Promise<boolean> => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.): Promise<boolean> => {🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Check for linting, formatting, and type errors
[failure] 22-22:
Prefer using the primitivebooleanas a type name, rather than the upper-casedBoolean🪛 Biome
[error] 22-22: Don't use 'Boolean' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'boolean' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
src/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.ts (1)
33-41: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
Timezone handling needs improvement in date comparison logic
The current implementation has potential timezone-related issues:
- The code mixes different date string formats:
toISOString().split("T")[0]for date comparison- Direct
Dateobject comparison for timetoUTCString()in other parts of the codebaseTo ensure consistent timezone handling, modify the code to:
...(args.currentDate && { $or: [ { endDate: { $gt: new Date(args.currentDate.toISOString().split('T')[0]) } }, { $and: [ { endDate: new Date(args.currentDate.toISOString().split('T')[0]) }, { endTime: { $gt: new Date(args.currentDate.toISOString()) } } ] } ] }),This ensures:
- Consistent UTC-based date comparisons
- Proper handling of timezone differences
- Alignment with the rest of the codebase's date handling patterns
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify date comparison logic for timezone safety.
The current date filtering implementation might have timezone-related issues:
- Splitting ISO string for date comparison could lead to incorrect results across timezones
- Direct comparison of
endTimewithcurrentDatemight not account for timezone differencesLet's verify the data format in the database:
Consider these improvements:
...(args.currentDate && { $or: [ - { endDate: { $gt: args.currentDate } }, - { - endDate: { $eq: args.currentDate.toISOString().split("T")[0] }, - endTime: { $gt: args.currentDate }, - }, + // Convert all dates to UTC for consistent comparison + { endDate: { $gt: new Date(args.currentDate).toISOString() } }, + { + $and: [ + { endDate: new Date(args.currentDate).toISOString().substring(0, 10) }, + { endTime: { $gt: new Date(args.currentDate).toISOString() } } + ] + } ], }),
Let me analyze the findings from the shell script execution to verify the timezone concerns in the date comparison logic:
From the Event model definition (src/models/Event.ts), we can see that:
endDateis stored as a Date typeendTimeis stored as a Date typeFrom the test files, we can observe that:
- Dates are consistently handled in UTC format (e.g.,
toUTCString(),toISOString())- Test cases use proper date objects and UTC conversions
Looking at the actual query implementation:
- The
args.currentDateis compared directly withendDatefor future events- For today's events, the code splits ISO string which could indeed cause timezone issues
Let me verify one more aspect of the date handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the format of endDate and endTime fields in events collection # Expected: Consistent date/time format and timezone handling # Check Event model/schema definition rg -A 5 "endDate|endTime" --type ts # Check sample event documents ast-grep --pattern 'new Event\($$$\)'Length of output: 123097
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check date handling in the codebase rg -A 3 "toISOString\(\)" --type ts rg -A 3 "toUTCString\(\)" --type tsLength of output: 7618
src/models/VolunteerMembership.ts (1)
33-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding indexes for query performance.
Given that this model will be used for volunteer leaderboard features and membership queries (as mentioned in PR objectives), consider adding indexes to optimize query performance.
Add indexes for common query patterns:
const volunteerMembershipSchema = new Schema( { // ... existing schema fields }, { timestamps: true, }, ); + +// Add indexes for common query patterns +volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ volunteer: 1, event: 1 }, { unique: true }); +volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ event: 1, status: 1 }); +volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ group: 1, status: 1 });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const volunteerMembershipSchema = new Schema( { volunteer: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteer", required: true, }, group: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteerGroup", }, event: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "Event", required: true, }, status: { type: String, enum: ["invited", "requested", "accepted", "rejected"], required: true, default: "invited", }, }, { timestamps: true, // Automatically manage `createdAt` and `updatedAt` fields }, ); // Add indexes for common query patterns volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ volunteer: 1, event: 1 }, { unique: true }); volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ event: 1, status: 1 }); volunteerMembershipSchema.index({ group: 1, status: 1 });tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByUser.spec.ts (2)
47-98: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cases for error scenarios.
The test suite lacks coverage for important error scenarios:
- Invalid user ID
- Invalid organization ID
- Missing required fields
- Invalid ordering parameter
Consider adding these test cases:
it('should handle invalid userId', async () => { const actionItems = await actionItemsByUser?.( {}, { userId: 'invalid_id', where: { orgId: testOrganization?._id.toString() } }, {} ); expect(actionItems).toEqual([]); }); it('should handle invalid orgId', async () => { const actionItems = await actionItemsByUser?.( {}, { userId: testUser1?._id.toString(), where: { orgId: 'invalid_org_id' } }, {} ); expect(actionItems).toEqual([]); });
48-63:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance test coverage for ordering verification.
The test case for
dueDate_ASCordering doesn't verify that the results are actually sorted by due date in ascending order.Add assertions to verify the ordering:
)) as unknown as InterfaceActionItem[]; expect(actionItems[0].assigneeType).toEqual("EventVolunteer"); expect(actionItems[1].assigneeType).toEqual("EventVolunteerGroup"); + // Verify ascending order + expect(new Date(actionItems[0].dueDate).getTime()).toBeLessThanOrEqual( + new Date(actionItems[1].dueDate).getTime() + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.it(`actionItemsByUser for userId, categoryName, dueDate_ASC`, async () => { const actionItems = (await actionItemsByUser?.( {}, { userId: testUser1?._id.toString() ?? "testUserId", orderBy: "dueDate_ASC", where: { categoryName: "Test Action Item Category 1", orgId: testOrganization?._id.toString(), }, }, {}, )) as unknown as InterfaceActionItem[]; expect(actionItems[0].assigneeType).toEqual("EventVolunteer"); expect(actionItems[1].assigneeType).toEqual("EventVolunteerGroup"); // Verify ascending order expect(new Date(actionItems[0].dueDate).getTime()).toBeLessThanOrEqual( new Date(actionItems[1].dueDate).getTime() ); });tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts (2)
27-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding more test cases for better coverage.
While the current test cases cover the basic functionality, consider adding:
Error cases:
- Invalid organization ID
- Invalid time frame
- Invalid sort order
Edge cases:
- Empty result set
- Multiple users with same hours
- Maximum limit scenarios
Input validation:
- Null/undefined parameters
- Invalid filter strings
Here's an example of additional test cases:
it('should handle invalid organization ID', async () => { const invalidOrgId = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId(); const result = await getVolunteerRanks?.({}, { orgId: invalidOrgId, where: { timeFrame: "allTime" } }, {}); expect(result).toHaveLength(0); }); it('should handle users with same hours', async () => { // Setup users with same hours const ranks = await getVolunteerRanks?.({}, { orgId: testOrganization?._id, where: { timeFrame: "allTime" } }, {}); // Users with same hours should have same rank expect(ranks[0].rank).toEqual(ranks[1].rank); });
29-39:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove type safety by avoiding type assertions and optional chaining.
The current implementation uses optional chaining and type assertions, which could mask potential type issues:
const volunteerRanks = (await getVolunteerRanks?.( ... )) as unknown as VolunteerRank[];Consider refactoring to:
- Remove optional chaining as the resolver should always exist
- Use proper typing for the resolver function
// At the top of the file import { QueryResolvers } from '../../../src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes'; // Type the resolver properly const resolver: QueryResolvers['getVolunteerRanks'] = getVolunteerRanks; // In the test const volunteerRanks = await resolver({}, { orgId: testOrganization?._id, where: { timeFrame: "allTime", orderBy: "hours_DESC" } }, {});Also applies to: 49-60, 67-78, 85-95
src/models/EventVolunteerGroup.ts (1)
15-24: 💡 Codebase verification
assignmentsfield should be optional to match GraphQL schemaLooking at the GraphQL schema definitions, the
assignmentsfield is indeed optional (not marked with!). The interface should be updated to mark it as optional withassignments?to maintain consistency with the schema.
- Update the interface field to:
assignments?: PopulatedDoc<InterfaceActionItem & Document>[];🔗 Analysis chain
Verify assignments field optionality and GraphQL schema alignment
The interface changes look good, but please verify:
- Should
assignmentsbe marked as optional (assignments?) since it has a default empty array in the schema?- Ensure these field changes align with the GraphQL schema type definitions
Let me search for schema-related files first to locate the GraphQL schema definitions.
Let me examine the type definitions across these files to verify the optionality of fields.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the GraphQL schema matches these field definitions rg -A 10 "type EventVolunteerGroup" "schema.graphql"Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for GraphQL schema files with different extensions and locations fd -e graphql -e gql # Also check for type definitions in TypeScript files fd -e ts -e tsx --exec grep -l "type EventVolunteerGroup" # Look for schema definitions in package.json or similar config files fd "package.json" --exec grep -l "schema"Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the GraphQL type definition in the schema files cat schema.graphql | grep -A 10 "type EventVolunteerGroup" # Check the TypeScript type definitions cat src/typeDefs/types.ts | grep -A 10 "type EventVolunteerGroup" # Also check the MongoDB schema definition cat src/models/EventVolunteerGroup.ts | grep -A 15 "const eventVolunteerGroupSchema"Length of output: 1024
tests/utilities/adminCheck.spec.ts (1)
88-88:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider removing explicit throwError parameter in this test case.
The test is verifying that no error is thrown for a super admin, but explicitly setting
throwError: falsemakes this test less meaningful. The test should verify that the authorization succeeds naturally, not because we've disabled error throwing.Consider this change:
await expect( adminCheck( updatedUser?.userId?.toString() ?? "", testOrganization ?? ({} as InterfaceOrganization), - false, ), ).resolves.not.toThrowError();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await expect( adminCheck( updatedUser?.userId?.toString() ?? "", testOrganization ?? ({} as InterfaceOrganization), ), ).resolves.not.toThrowError();tests/helpers/actionItem.ts (1)
87-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with different assignee types
All test action items are created with
assigneeType: "EventVolunteer". This might not provide adequate test coverage if the system supports multiple assignee types.Consider parameterizing the assignee type or creating additional test helpers for different assignee types. For example:
interface ActionItemConfig { assigneeType: string; isCompleted?: boolean; // ... other config options } export const createTestActionItemWithConfig = async ( config: ActionItemConfig ): Promise<TestActionItemType> => { // ... create action item with provided config };Also applies to: 97-97, 107-107
tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts (2)
57-128: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with additional assertions.
While the current tests verify basic functionality, consider adding assertions for:
- Array length validation
- Complete object structure verification
- Edge cases with empty or invalid input
Example enhancement for the first test:
expect(groups).toHaveLength(1); expect(groups[0]).toMatchObject({ name: testVolunteerGroup1.name, leader: testUser1._id, volunteers: expect.arrayContaining([testEventVolunteer1._id]) });
56-128: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now generate the final response:
Consider adding pagination support for volunteer groups query
The current implementation of
getEventVolunteerGroupslacks pagination support, which could impact performance with large datasets. While sorting functionality is well-tested, consider:
- Adding pagination parameters (limit/offset) to
EventVolunteerGroupWhereInputin the GraphQL schema- Implementing pagination in the resolver to handle large volunteer group lists efficiently
- Adding tests for pagination scenarios
The existing test coverage for sorting and filtering is good, but error cases for invalid sorting parameters should also be tested.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding tests for additional scenarios.
To fully validate the volunteer management features mentioned in the PR objectives, consider adding tests for:
- Pagination functionality
- Combined filtering scenarios (e.g., name_contains + leaderName + sorting)
- Error cases for invalid sorting parameters
- Performance with large datasets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if similar test patterns exist in other test files rg -l "orderBy.*(_ASC|_DESC)" "tests/**/*.spec.ts"Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find all test files to understand the test structure fd "\.spec\.ts$" # Then check for existing orderBy patterns in these files rg "orderBy.*(_ASC|_DESC)" # Look for pagination patterns in tests rg -i "pagination|limit|offset|skip" "\.spec\.ts$" # Check the resolver implementation to understand what features need testing fd "getEventVolunteerGroups\.(ts|js)$" --type f --exclude "*.spec.ts"Length of output: 32810
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of getEventVolunteerGroups to understand pagination support cat src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts # Check if there are any pagination patterns in similar resolver files rg -A 5 "limit|offset|skip|page" "src/resolvers/Query/*.ts" # Look for GraphQL type definitions related to volunteer groups rg "type.*VolunteerGroup" -A 10Length of output: 30508
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (2)
60-136: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving test organization and coverage.
The test suite would benefit from:
- Grouping related tests using nested describe blocks (e.g., "filtering tests", "status tests")
- Adding test cases for pagination and sorting scenarios
Here's a suggested structure:
describe("resolvers -> Query -> getVolunteerMembership", () => { describe("status filtering", () => { it("returns invited memberships", async () => { // existing invited status test }); it("returns accepted memberships", async () => { // existing accepted status test }); }); describe("filtering and search", () => { it("filters by group and username", async () => { // existing group filter test }); it("returns only individual memberships", async () => { // existing individual filter test }); }); describe("pagination and sorting", () => { it("respects pagination limits", async () => { // new test for pagination }); it("sorts results correctly", async () => { // new test for sorting }); }); });
120-136:
⚠️ Potential issueFix duplicate test description and enhance type safety.
- The test description is identical to the previous test but tests different functionality
- Consider using a more type-safe approach for casting results
Apply these fixes:
- it(`getVolunteerMembership for eventId, filter group, userName`, async () => { + it(`getVolunteerMembership should return only individual memberships`, async () => { const volunteerMemberships = (await getVolunteerMembership?.( {}, { where: { userId: testUser1?._id.toString(), filter: "individual", }, }, {}, - )) as unknown as InterfaceVolunteerMembership[]; + )) as InterfaceVolunteerMembership[] | null; + expect(volunteerMemberships).not.toBeNull(); expect(volunteerMemberships.length).toEqual(3);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/models/ActionItem.ts (2)
62-76: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding validation and indexes for assignee fields.
While the schema structure is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add mongoose middleware to ensure only one assignee field is populated based on assigneeType
- Add indexes for frequently queried assignee fields
Add this validation middleware:
actionItemSchema.pre('save', function(next) { const doc = this as InterfaceActionItem; // Ensure only the correct assignee field is set based on assigneeType switch(doc.assigneeType) { case 'EventVolunteer': if (!doc.assignee || doc.assigneeGroup || doc.assigneeUser) { return next(new Error('EventVolunteer type must only have assignee field')); } break; case 'EventVolunteerGroup': if (doc.assignee || !doc.assigneeGroup || doc.assigneeUser) { return next(new Error('EventVolunteerGroup type must only have assigneeGroup field')); } break; case 'User': if (doc.assignee || doc.assigneeGroup || !doc.assigneeUser) { return next(new Error('User type must only have assigneeUser field')); } break; } next(); }); // Add indexes for better query performance actionItemSchema.index({ assignee: 1, organization: 1 }); actionItemSchema.index({ assigneeGroup: 1, organization: 1 }); actionItemSchema.index({ assigneeUser: 1, organization: 1 });
16-19:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistency in assigneeType enum values.
The interface defines
assigneeTypeas"EventVolunteer" | "EventVolunteerGroup"but the schema includes"User"as a valid value. This inconsistency could lead to runtime errors.Apply this diff to fix the interface:
- assigneeType: "EventVolunteer" | "EventVolunteerGroup"; + assigneeType: "EventVolunteer" | "EventVolunteerGroup" | "User";Additionally, consider documenting the relationship between
assigneeandassigneeUserfields to clarify when each should be used.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.assignee: PopulatedDoc<InterfaceEventVolunteer & Document>; assigneeGroup: PopulatedDoc<InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup & Document>; assigneeUser: PopulatedDoc<InterfaceUser & Document>; assigneeType: "EventVolunteer" | "EventVolunteerGroup" | "User";tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (2)
81-83: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add more descriptive assertions for successful cases.
The successful case could benefit from more detailed assertions.
-expect((await checkUserExists(testUser?._id))._id).toEqual(testUser?._id); +const result = await checkUserExists(testUser?._id); +expect(result).toBeDefined(); +expect(result._id).toEqual(testUser?._id); +expect(result).toMatchObject({ + _id: testUser?._id, + // Add other expected properties +});Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
66-79: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error type assertions and spy verification.
The error handling could be more specific and the spy verification more detailed.
try { await checkUserExists(testUser?.appUserProfileId); + fail('Expected an error to be thrown'); } catch (error: unknown) { + expect(error).toBeInstanceOf(Error); expect((error as Error).message).toEqual( `Translated ${USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE}`, ); } -expect(spy).toBeCalledWith(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE); +expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE); +expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.it("checkUserExists -> invalid userId", async () => { const spy = vi .spyOn(requestContext, "translate") .mockImplementationOnce((message) => `Translated ${message}`); try { await checkUserExists(testUser?.appUserProfileId); fail('Expected an error to be thrown'); } catch (error: unknown) { expect(error).toBeInstanceOf(Error); expect((error as Error).message).toEqual( `Translated ${USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE}`, ); } expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE); expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); });tests/resolvers/Mutation/createVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1)
33-35:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary type export from test file.
The
TestEventVolunteerGroupTypeis only used within this test file. Exporting types from test files is discouraged as it can lead to test code being imported into production code.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-export type TestEventVolunteerGroupType = +type TestEventVolunteerGroupType = | (InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup & Document) | null;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.type TestEventVolunteerGroupType = | (InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup & Document) | null;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 32-35: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
src/models/Event.ts (1)
184-191:
⚠️ Potential issueReview the required/default configuration and consider adding validation.
There are a few considerations for the volunteers field configuration:
- Setting
required: truewithdefault: []is contradictory since the default value already ensures the field won't be null/undefined.- Consider adding validation for the maximum number of volunteers, similar to the images field, if there should be a limit.
Consider applying these changes:
volunteers: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteer", - required: true, - default: [], + default: undefined, }, ],Or if you want to ensure it's always an array:
volunteers: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteer", - required: true, - default: [], }, ], + default: [],Optionally, add validation if needed:
volunteers: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteer", - required: true, - default: [], }, ], + default: [], + validate: { + validator: function(volunteers: Types.ObjectId[]): boolean { + return volunteers.length <= YOUR_MAX_LIMIT; + }, + message: "Maximum number of volunteers exceeded.", + },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (2)
57-58:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate test data to reflect new EventVolunteer model structure.
The commented out
responsefield suggests the model has changed. Based on the PR summary, the EventVolunteer model now useshasAccepted,isPublic, and other new fields. Update the test data to use the new field structure:data: { - // response: EventVolunteerResponse.YES, + hasAccepted: true, + isPublic: true, + hoursVolunteered: 0 },Also applies to: 86-87
137-198:
⚠️ Potential issueRestore and update the positive test cases.
The commented out tests covered important scenarios:
- Successful update with all fields
- Update with empty data object
These tests should be restored and updated to use the new EventVolunteer model structure. The tests should verify:
- Setting of new fields (
hasAccepted,isPublic,hoursVolunteered)- Default values when using empty data object
- Proper relationship with the event and user
Would you like me to help generate the updated test cases with the new model structure?
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.spec.ts (1)
65-65: 💡 Codebase verification
Error scenarios in resolver match test cases with additional event validation
The resolver implementation shows proper error handling that aligns with and extends beyond the test scenarios:
- User existence check via
checkUserExists- Event existence check with
EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR- Group existence check with
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR- Authorization check with
USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERRORfor non-admins/non-leadersThe test cases should be expanded to include the event existence check scenario.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consistent error scenario coverage with updated args structure.
The test cases properly validate error scenarios with the new argument structure including
eventId. The coverage includes user existence, group existence, and authorization checks.Let's verify that all error cases in the resolver match these test scenarios:
Also applies to: 97-97, 131-131
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in the resolver matches test scenarios # Search for error constants usage in the resolver rg "USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR|EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR|USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR" src/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.tsLength of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify error handling in the resolver # First, let's look at the actual resolver implementation cat src/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.tsLength of output: 2876
src/typeDefs/enums.ts (1)
144-158: 💡 Codebase verification
Enums are properly integrated but some sorting options are not implemented
The enums are properly defined and used in the GraphQL schema and queries, but there are missing implementations in the
getSortfunction for:
members_ASCandmembers_DESCfromEventVolunteerGroupOrderByInputassignments_ASCandassignments_DESCfromEventVolunteerGroupOrderByInputThe following are correctly implemented:
hoursVolunteered_ASCandhoursVolunteered_DESCfromEventVolunteersOrderByInputcreatedAt_ASCandcreatedAt_DESCfromVolunteerMembershipOrderByInput🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the enum usage in queries and mutations.
Let's ensure these enums are properly integrated with their corresponding GraphQL operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new enums are used in GraphQL operations # Test 1: Check for EventVolunteersOrderByInput usage echo "Checking EventVolunteersOrderByInput usage:" rg -l "EventVolunteersOrderByInput" --type ts # Test 2: Check for EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput usage echo -e "\nChecking EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput usage:" rg -l "EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput" --type ts # Test 3: Check for VolunteerMembershipOrderByInput usage echo -e "\nChecking VolunteerMembershipOrderByInput usage:" rg -l "VolunteerMembershipOrderByInput" --type ts # Test 4: Look for corresponding GraphQL operations echo -e "\nChecking for related GraphQL operations:" rg "orderBy.*EventVolunteers|orderBy.*EventVolunteerGroup|orderBy.*VolunteerMembership" --type graphqlLength of output: 1081
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual GraphQL queries and schema files with a more specific search # Check for GraphQL files with .graphql extension echo "Checking for .graphql files:" fd -e graphql # Check for GraphQL schema and operations in .ts files echo -e "\nChecking GraphQL operations in TypeScript files:" rg "orderBy.*:.*(?:EventVolunteers|EventVolunteerGroup|VolunteerMembership).*Input" --type ts -A 2 # Check the queries.ts file specifically for these orderBy implementations echo -e "\nChecking queries.ts implementation:" cat src/typeDefs/queries.ts | grep -A 5 "orderBy" # Check resolver implementation echo -e "\nChecking resolver implementation in getSort.ts:" cat src/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getSort.tsLength of output: 10667
tests/helpers/volunteers.ts (4)
140-148: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract date calculations into a helper function
The date calculations contain magic numbers and could be made more maintainable.
Consider extracting into a helper function:
interface TestDates { today: Date; yesterday: Date; twoWeeksAgo: Date; twoMonthsAgo: Date; twoYearsAgo: Date; } function generateTestDates(): TestDates { const today = new Date(); return { today, yesterday: new Date(today.setDate(today.getDate() - 1)), twoWeeksAgo: new Date(today.setDate(today.getDate() - 14)), twoMonthsAgo: new Date(today.setMonth(today.getMonth() - 2)), twoYearsAgo: new Date(today.setFullYear(today.getFullYear() - 2)) }; }
217-227: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use transactions for related updates
The sequential updates to related entities could lead to inconsistent state if any operation fails. Consider using MongoDB transactions.
Example implementation:
const session = await mongoose.startSession(); try { await session.withTransaction(async () => { await Event.updateOne( { _id: testEvent._id }, { $addToSet: { volunteers: { $each: [testVolunteer1._id, testVolunteer2._id] }, volunteerGroups: testVolunteerGroup._id, }, }, { session } ); await EventVolunteer.updateMany( { _id: { $in: [testVolunteer1._id, testVolunteer2._id] } }, { $push: { groups: testVolunteerGroup._id, assignments: testActionItem2._id, }, }, { session } ); }); } finally { await session.endSession(); }Also applies to: 274-282
236-266: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider parameterizing action item creation
The action item creation logic is duplicated with only slight variations. Consider extracting to a helper function.
Example implementation:
interface ActionItemParams { assigneeType: 'EventVolunteer' | 'EventVolunteerGroup'; assignee?: string | null; assigneeGroup?: string | null; assigneeUser?: string | null; allotedHours: number; dueDateOffset: number; } async function createTestActionItem( params: ActionItemParams, baseData: { creator: string; actionItemCategory: string; event: string; organization: string; } ): Promise<TestActionItemType> { return ActionItem.create({ ...baseData, assigner: baseData.creator, ...params, assignmentDate: new Date(), dueDate: new Date(Date.now() + params.dueDateOffset), isCompleted: false, }); }
28-105: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and cleanup mechanism
The function successfully creates test entities but has several areas for improvement:
- Consider wrapping database operations in try-catch blocks
- Add cleanup mechanism to remove test data after tests
- Replace optional chaining with proper null checks for database operations
Example implementation:
export const createTestVolunteerAndGroup = async (): Promise<[ TestUserType, TestOrganizationType, TestEventType, TestVolunteerType, TestVolunteerGroupType, ]> => { + const createdEntities = []; + try { const [testUser, testOrganization] = await createTestUserAndOrganization(); const randomUser = await createTestUser(); + if (!testUser?._id || !testOrganization?._id || !randomUser?._id) { + throw new Error('Failed to create test users or organization'); + } const testEvent = await Event.create({ // ... existing properties }); + createdEntities.push(testEvent); // ... rest of the function return [testUser, testOrganization, testEvent, testVolunteer, testVolunteerGroup]; + } catch (error) { + // Cleanup created entities in reverse order + for (const entity of createdEntities.reverse()) { + await entity.deleteOne(); + } + throw error; + } };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2)
304-306: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum and input type for better type safety.
Two suggestions to improve the mutation:
- Define an enum for the status field instead of using String to ensure only valid status values are accepted
- Create an input type to wrap the parameters, following the pattern used in other mutations
Consider this refactor:
- updateVolunteerMembership(id: ID!, status: String!): VolunteerMembership! + """ + Valid status values for volunteer membership + """ + enum VolunteerMembershipStatus { + PENDING + APPROVED + REJECTED + } + + input UpdateVolunteerMembershipInput { + id: ID! + status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! + } + + updateVolunteerMembership( + data: UpdateVolunteerMembershipInput! + ): VolunteerMembership!Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
301-301: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueBreaking change confirmed:
dataparameter was previously nullableThe git history shows that
data: UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInputwas previously nullable and has been explicitly changed to non-nullable (data: UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput!). This is indeed a breaking change that could affect existing clients who might be passing null values.
- Location:
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts- Previous:
data: UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput- Changed to:
data: UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput!🔗 Analysis chain
Breaking Change:
dataparameter made non-nullable.Making the
dataparameter non-nullable (UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput!) is a breaking change. Existing clients that might be passing null for this parameter will break. This contradicts the PR objective stating there are no breaking changes.Let's verify the impact:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing calls to updateEventVolunteerGroup to assess impact rg -A 3 'updateEventVolunteerGroup.*\bnull\b|updateEventVolunteerGroup.*\bundefined\b'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for updateEventVolunteerGroup usage rg -A 3 'updateEventVolunteerGroup' # Also search for the input type definition to understand its structure ast-grep --pattern 'input UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput { $$$ }'Length of output: 7534
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the git history to see if this parameter was previously nullable git log -p -- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts | grep -B 5 -A 5 "UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput" # Also let's check the resolver implementation to see how it handles the data cat src/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.tsLength of output: 1124
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
169-181: 💡 Codebase verification
Validation for leader-volunteer relationship is missing
Looking at the implementation in
src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteerGroup.ts, there is no validation to ensure that theleaderIdis included in thevolunteerUserIdsarray. The resolver creates volunteer records and memberships for all volunteers but doesn't verify if the leader is part of the volunteer list.Potential issues:
- A leader could be assigned without being part of the volunteer group
- This could lead to inconsistency in the group structure and permissions
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding validation for leader-volunteer relationship.
While the input structure is good, consider adding a validation to ensure that the
leaderIdcorresponds to a user in thevolunteerUserIdsarray.Let's check if this validation exists in the resolver:
Let's search for any validation logic in the resolvers or services. If we don't find it directly, we'll need to look at the mutation implementation.
I see the resolver file exists, let's check its implementation to verify if there's any validation for the leader being part of the volunteer list.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EventVolunteerGroup resolver implementations ast-grep --pattern 'createEventVolunteerGroup($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EventVolunteerGroup resolver implementations with broader patterns rg -l "EventVolunteerGroup" --type ts # After finding the files, let's look for validation logic rg -A 10 "createEventVolunteerGroup" --type tsLength of output: 14735
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the implementation of createEventVolunteerGroup resolver cat src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteerGroup.tsLength of output: 4741
src/resolvers/Mutation/removeEventVolunteer.ts (3)
27-28:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd authorization checks to ensure user permission
Currently, the code verifies that the user exists using
checkUserExists(context.userId), but it does not check whether the user has the necessary permissions to remove an event volunteer. To enhance security, consider adding an authorization check to ensure that only authorized users can perform this operation.Apply this diff to include an authorization check:
async (_parent, args, context) => { + // Check if the user has permission to remove an event volunteer + await checkUserHasPermission(context.userId, 'REMOVE_EVENT_VOLUNTEER'); await checkUserExists(context.userId); const volunteer = await checkEventVolunteerExists(args.id);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
31-33:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
volunteer.groupsis defined to prevent runtime errorsIf
volunteer.groupsisundefinedornull, accessinggroupIds.lengthcould lead to a runtime error. It's safer to initializegroupIdsto an empty array ifvolunteer.groupsis not defined.Apply this diff to safeguard against undefined
groups:const groupIds = volunteer.groups; -if (groupIds.length > 0) { +if (groupIds && groupIds.length > 0) { await EventVolunteerGroup.updateMany( { _id: { $in: groupIds } }, { $pull: { volunteers: volunteer._id } },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
41-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use database transactions to maintain data integrity
Deleting the volunteer and their memberships should be an atomic operation to prevent partial data deletion in case of an error. Using a transaction ensures that either all deletions succeed or none do.
Apply this diff to implement a transaction (assuming your database supports it):
+import mongoose from 'mongoose'; export const removeEventVolunteer: MutationResolvers["removeEventVolunteer"] = async (_parent, args, context) => { + const session = await mongoose.startSession(); + session.startTransaction(); await checkUserExists(context.userId); const volunteer = await checkEventVolunteerExists(args.id); // Remove volunteer from their groups if any const groupIds = volunteer.groups; if (groupIds && groupIds.length > 0) { await EventVolunteerGroup.updateMany( { _id: { $in: groupIds } }, { $pull: { volunteers: volunteer._id } }, + { session } ); } // Delete the volunteer and their memberships await Promise.all([ - EventVolunteer.deleteOne({ _id: volunteer._id }), - VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ volunteer: volunteer._id }), + EventVolunteer.deleteOne({ _id: volunteer._id }).session(session), + VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ volunteer: volunteer._id }).session(session), ]); + await session.commitTransaction(); + session.endSession(); return volunteer; };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Mutation/removeEventVolunteerGroup.ts (3)
47-48:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary optional chaining operator
The
currentUseris guaranteed to exist aftercheckUserExists(context.userId). Using the optional chaining operator (?.) when accessingcurrentUser._idis unnecessary and could mask potential errors. It's better to remove it to ensure that any unexpectednullorundefinedvalues are caught during development.Apply this diff to remove the optional chaining operator:
const userIsEventAdmin = event.admins.some( - (admin) => admin.toString() === currentUser?._id.toString(), + (admin) => admin.toString() === currentUser._id.toString(), );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const userIsEventAdmin = event.admins.some( (admin) => admin.toString() === currentUser._id.toString(),
36-38:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for null or undefined
volunteerGroup.eventWhen retrieving the event using
volunteerGroup.event, ensure thatvolunteerGroup.eventis notnullorundefined. If it is, callingEvent.findByIdwith an invalid ID could lead to unexpected behavior. Add a check to handle this scenario gracefully.Apply this diff to add the null check:
const volunteerGroup = await checkVolunteerGroupExists(args.id); + if (!volunteerGroup.event) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError( + requestContext.translate(EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), + EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, + EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, + ); + } + const event = await Event.findById(volunteerGroup.event) .populate("organization") .lean();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const volunteerGroup = await checkVolunteerGroupExists(args.id); if (!volunteerGroup.event) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } const event = await Event.findById(volunteerGroup.event) .populate("organization") .lean();
65-83: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a transaction to ensure atomicity of database operations
Multiple database operations are being executed in parallel using
Promise.all. If one of these operations fails, it could leave your data in an inconsistent state. To maintain data integrity, consider wrapping these operations within a transaction so that all operations either succeed or fail together.Apply this diff to implement a transaction:
+import mongoose from "mongoose"; + export const removeEventVolunteerGroup: MutationResolvers["removeEventVolunteerGroup"] = async (_parent, args, context) => { + const session = await mongoose.startSession(); + session.startTransaction(); try { const currentUser = await checkUserExists(context.userId); const volunteerGroup = await checkVolunteerGroupExists(args.id); const event = await Event.findById(volunteerGroup.event) .populate("organization") .lean(); if (!event) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } const userIsEventAdmin = event.admins.some( (admin) => admin.toString() === currentUser._id.toString(), ); const isAdmin = await adminCheck( currentUser._id, event.organization, false, ); // Checks if user is Event Admin or Admin of the organization if (!isAdmin && !userIsEventAdmin) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, ); } await Promise.all([ // Remove the volunteer group - EventVolunteerGroup.deleteOne({ _id: args.id }), + EventVolunteerGroup.deleteOne({ _id: args.id }).session(session), // Remove the group from volunteers EventVolunteer.updateMany( { groups: { $in: args.id } }, { $pull: { groups: args.id } }, + ).session(session), // Delete all associated volunteer group memberships - VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ group: args.id }), + VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ group: args.id }).session(session), // Remove the group from the event Event.updateOne( { _id: volunteerGroup.event }, { $pull: { volunteerGroups: args.id } }, + ).session(session), ]); + await session.commitTransaction(); + session.endSession(); return volunteerGroup; + } catch (error) { + await session.abortTransaction(); + session.endSession(); + throw error; + } };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByOrganization.ts (2)
57-74: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor filtering logic to eliminate duplication
The code for constructing the
namevariable is repeated across differentassigneeTypeconditions. Refactoring this logic can improve readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
const assigneeName = args.where.assigneeName.toLowerCase(); filteredActionItems = filteredActionItems.filter((item) => { const assigneeType = item.assigneeType; + let name = ''; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { const assignee = item.assignee as InterfaceEventVolunteer; const assigneeUser = assignee.user as InterfaceUser; - const name = - `${assigneeUser.firstName} ${assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); + name = `${assigneeUser.firstName} ${assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); - return name.includes(assigneeName); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { - return item.assigneeGroup.name.toLowerCase().includes(assigneeName); + name = item.assigneeGroup.name.toLowerCase(); } else if (assigneeType === "User") { - const name = - `${item.assigneeUser.firstName} ${item.assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); + name = `${item.assigneeUser.firstName} ${item.assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); - return name.includes(assigneeName); } + return name.includes(assigneeName); });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const assigneeName = args.where.assigneeName.toLowerCase(); filteredActionItems = filteredActionItems.filter((item) => { const assigneeType = item.assigneeType; let name = ''; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { const assignee = item.assignee as InterfaceEventVolunteer; const assigneeUser = assignee.user as InterfaceUser; name = `${assigneeUser.firstName} ${assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { name = item.assigneeGroup.name.toLowerCase(); } else if (assigneeType === "User") { name = `${item.assigneeUser.firstName} ${item.assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); } return name.includes(assigneeName); });
57-74:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle unexpected
assigneeTypevaluesThe current logic does not account for unexpected
assigneeTypevalues. Adding anelseclause can enhance robustness by handling unforeseen cases and preventing potential runtime errors.Apply this diff to handle unexpected
assigneeTypevalues:... } else if (assigneeType === "User") { name = `${item.assigneeUser.firstName} ${item.assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return name.includes(assigneeName); +} else { + // Handle unexpected assigneeType + console.warn(`Unknown assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`); + return false; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const assigneeName = args.where.assigneeName.toLowerCase(); filteredActionItems = filteredActionItems.filter((item) => { const assigneeType = item.assigneeType; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { const assignee = item.assignee as InterfaceEventVolunteer; const assigneeUser = assignee.user as InterfaceUser; const name = `${assigneeUser.firstName} ${assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return name.includes(assigneeName); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { return item.assigneeGroup.name.toLowerCase().includes(assigneeName); } else if (assigneeType === "User") { const name = `${item.assigneeUser.firstName} ${item.assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return name.includes(assigneeName); } else { // Handle unexpected assigneeType console.warn(`Unknown assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`); return false; }src/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.ts (4)
24-24:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate the presence of required fields in
args.dataThe destructuring of
args.dataassumes thateventId,description,name, andvolunteersRequiredare provided. If any of these fields are optional, they may beundefined, leading to unexpected behavior. Consider adding validation to ensure required fields are present or handle undefined values appropriately.
62-62:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined
group.leaderEnsure that
group.leaderis defined before callingtoString()to prevent runtime errors.Add a check for
group.leader:+ if (!group.leader) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError("Group leader not found"); + } if ( !isAdmin && !userIsEventAdmin && group.leader.toString() !== currentUser._id.toString() ) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, ); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
77-79:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate only the fields provided to avoid overwriting existing data
Directly setting
description,name, andvolunteersRequiredwithout checking if they are provided may overwrite existing fields withundefined. Modify the update logic to set only the fields that are provided inargs.data.Apply this diff to conditionally update fields:
- $set: { - description, - name, - volunteersRequired, - }, + $set: { + ...(description !== undefined && { description }), + ...(name !== undefined && { name }), + ...(volunteersRequired !== undefined && { volunteersRequired }), + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements....(description !== undefined && { description }), ...(name !== undefined && { name }), ...(volunteersRequired !== undefined && { volunteersRequired }),
35-38:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
event.adminsis defined and an array before usingsomeTo prevent potential runtime errors, verify that
event.adminsexists and is an array before calling thesomemethod. This ensures that the authorization check for event admins executes safely.Apply this check before the
somemethod:+ if (!Array.isArray(event.admins)) { + throw new errors.InternalServerError("Event admins should be an array"); + } const userIsEventAdmin = event.admins.some( (admin: { toString: () => string }) => admin.toString() === currentUser._id.toString(), );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!Array.isArray(event.admins)) { throw new errors.InternalServerError("Event admins should be an array"); } const userIsEventAdmin = event.admins.some( (admin: { toString: () => string }) => admin.toString() === currentUser?._id.toString(), );src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (2)
63-65:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd authorization checks to ensure user has permission to update membership
Currently, the function verifies that the user exists but does not check whether the user has the appropriate permissions to update the volunteer membership. Consider adding an authorization check to ensure that only authorized users can perform this action.
19-49:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure atomicity of database updates to prevent inconsistent state
The
handleAcceptedStatusUpdatesfunction performs multiple database updates without ensuring atomicity. If one of the updates fails, it may lead to inconsistent data in the database. Consider wrapping these operations in a transaction to ensure that all updates are applied atomically.If your database supports transactions (e.g., MongoDB 4.0+ with replica sets), you can implement transactions as follows:
const handleAcceptedStatusUpdates = async ( membership: InterfaceVolunteerMembership, ): Promise<void> => { - const updatePromises = []; + const session = await VolunteerMembership.startSession(); + session.startTransaction(); try { // Always update EventVolunteer to set hasAccepted to true await EventVolunteer.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.volunteer, event: membership.event }, { $set: { hasAccepted: true }, ...(membership.group && { $push: { groups: membership.group } }), }, - ), + ).session(session); // Always update Event to add volunteer await Event.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.event }, { $addToSet: { volunteers: membership.volunteer } }, - ), + ).session(session); // If group exists, update the EventVolunteerGroup as well if (membership.group) { await EventVolunteerGroup.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.group }, { $addToSet: { volunteers: membership.volunteer } }, - ), + ).session(session); } + await session.commitTransaction(); + } catch (error) { + await session.abortTransaction(); + throw error; + } finally { + session.endSession(); + } };This ensures that all updates either succeed together or fail without modifying the database state.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const session = await VolunteerMembership.startSession(); session.startTransaction(); try { // Always update EventVolunteer to set hasAccepted to true await EventVolunteer.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.volunteer, event: membership.event }, { $set: { hasAccepted: true }, ...(membership.group && { $push: { groups: membership.group } }), }, ).session(session); // Always update Event to add volunteer await Event.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.event }, { $addToSet: { volunteers: membership.volunteer } }, ).session(session); // If group exists, update the EventVolunteerGroup as well if (membership.group) { await EventVolunteerGroup.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: membership.group }, { $addToSet: { volunteers: membership.volunteer } }, ).session(session); } await session.commitTransaction(); } catch (error) { await session.abortTransaction(); throw error; } finally { session.endSession(); }src/resolvers/Mutation/createVolunteerMembership.ts (4)
28-28:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate the
@returnsdescription to match the actual return value.The
@returnstag mentions returning an event volunteer record, but the function returns a volunteer membership record. Please update the documentation for accuracy.Apply this diff to correct the return description:
- * @returns The created event volunteer record. + * @returns The created volunteer membership record.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.* @returns The created volunteer membership record.
16-16:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the typo in the documentation comment.
There's a typo in the documentation on line 16: "vvolunteer" should be "volunteer".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- * 5. Returns the created vvolunteer membership record. + * 5. Returns the created volunteer membership record.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.* 5. Returns the created volunteer membership record.
33-33:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate required input fields to ensure they are provided.
Currently, if
eventId,userId, orstatusis undefined, it could lead to errors down the line. It's best to validate these required fields upfront.Consider adding validation checks:
const { event: eventId, status, group, userId } = args.data; + if (!eventId || !userId || !status) { + throw new errors.ValidationError("Missing required fields: eventId, userId, or status."); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { event: eventId, status, group, userId } = args.data; if (!eventId || !userId || !status) { throw new errors.ValidationError("Missing required fields: eventId, userId, or status."); }
55-69:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent duplicate volunteer memberships by checking for existing records.
Before creating a new
VolunteerMembership, check if a membership already exists for the volunteer, event, and group combination to avoid duplicates.Add a check for existing memberships:
// check if event volunteer exists let eventVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.findOne({ user: userId, event: eventId, }).lean(); if (!eventVolunteer) { // create the volunteer eventVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.create({ user: userId, event: eventId, creator: context.userId, groups: [], }); } + // Check if volunteer membership already exists + const existingMembership = await VolunteerMembership.findOne({ + volunteer: eventVolunteer._id, + event: eventId, + ...(group && { group }), + }).lean(); + + if (existingMembership) { + throw new errors.ConflictError("Volunteer membership already exists."); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// check if event volunteer exists let eventVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.findOne({ user: userId, event: eventId, }).lean(); if (!eventVolunteer) { // create the volunteer eventVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.create({ user: userId, event: eventId, creator: context.userId, groups: [], }); } // Check if volunteer membership already exists const existingMembership = await VolunteerMembership.findOne({ volunteer: eventVolunteer._id, event: eventId, ...(group && { group }), }).lean(); if (existingMembership) { throw new errors.ConflictError("Volunteer membership already exists."); }src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts (3)
77-84:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for existing volunteer to prevent duplicates
Before creating a new
EventVolunteer, verify that the user is not already a volunteer for the event to prevent duplicate entries.Consider adding this check:
// Before creating the volunteer const existingVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.findOne({ user: userId, event: eventId }); if (existingVolunteer) { throw new errors.ConflictError( 'User is already a volunteer for this event.', 'EVENT_VOLUNTEER_ALREADY_EXISTS', { userId, eventId }, ); }
77-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a transaction to ensure atomicity
Since you're creating both an
EventVolunteerand aVolunteerMembership, wrapping these operations in a transaction ensures that both are committed or rolled back together in case of an error.Here's how you might implement it:
const session = await EventVolunteer.startSession(); session.startTransaction(); try { const createdVolunteer = await EventVolunteer.create( [ { user: userId, event: eventId, creator: context.userId, groups: [], }, ], { session } ); await VolunteerMembership.create( [ { volunteer: createdVolunteer._id, event: eventId, status: 'invited', }, ], { session } ); await session.commitTransaction(); session.endSession(); return createdVolunteer.toObject(); } catch (error) { await session.abortTransaction(); session.endSession(); throw error; }
41-48:
⚠️ Potential issueUse appropriate error constant when volunteer user is not found
Currently, when the volunteer user is not found, the code throws
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR. Since we are checking for a user's existence, it would be more accurate to useUSER_NOT_FOUND_ERRORto reflect the actual issue.Apply this diff to update the error handling:
throw new errors.NotFoundError( - requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, + requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), + USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, + USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const volunteerUser = await User.findById(userId).lean(); if (!volunteerUser) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); }src/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.ts (5)
48-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize populate calls to improve query performance
Similar to the previous suggestion, consolidate multiple
.populatecalls into a single one to enhance performance in thegetVolunteerMembershipsByEventIdfunction.Apply this diff to optimize the population:
return await VolunteerMembership.find({ event: eventId, ...(status && { status }), }) .sort(sort) - .populate("event") - .populate("group") - .populate({ - path: "volunteer", - populate: { - path: "user", - }, - }) + .populate([ + { path: "event" }, + { path: "group" }, + { + path: "volunteer", + populate: { path: "user" }, + }, + ]) .lean();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return await VolunteerMembership.find({ event: eventId, ...(status && { status }), }) .sort(sort) .populate([ { path: "event" }, { path: "group" }, { path: "volunteer", populate: { path: "user" }, }, ]) .lean(); };
85-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve userName search to be case-insensitive and handle spacing
The current implementation concatenates
firstNameandlastNamewithout a space and performs a case-sensitive search. This may lead to incorrect filtering results. Consider adding a space between the names and making the search case-insensitive to improve accuracy.Apply this diff to enhance the userName filtering:
- const userNameCondition = userName - ? ( - membership.volunteer.user.firstName + - membership.volunteer.user.lastName - ).includes(userName) - : true; + const fullName = membership.volunteer.user.firstName + ' ' + membership.volunteer.user.lastName; + const userNameCondition = userName + ? fullName.toLowerCase().includes(userName.toLowerCase()) + : true;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const fullName = membership.volunteer.user.firstName + ' ' + membership.volunteer.user.lastName; const userNameCondition = userName ? fullName.toLowerCase().includes(userName.toLowerCase()) : true;
102-114:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate input when neither userId nor eventId is provided
If neither
userIdnoreventIdis provided, the resolver returns an empty array without any feedback. It's better to validate the input and inform the client that at least one of these identifiers must be supplied.Apply this diff to add input validation:
+ if (!userId && !eventId) { + throw new Error("You must provide either a userId or an eventId."); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!userId && !eventId) { throw new Error("You must provide either a userId or an eventId."); } if (userId) { volunteerMemberships = await getVolunteerMembershipsByUserId( userId, args.orderBy, status ?? undefined, ); } else if (eventId) { volunteerMemberships = await getVolunteerMembershipsByEventId( eventId, args.orderBy, status ?? undefined, ); }
22-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize populate calls to improve query performance
Multiple
.populatecalls can lead to inefficient queries. Consolidate them into a single.populate()with an array to enhance performance.Apply this diff to optimize the population:
return await VolunteerMembership.find({ volunteer: { $in: volunteerIds }, ...(status && { status }), }) .sort(sort) - .populate("event") - .populate("group") - .populate({ - path: "volunteer", - populate: { - path: "user", - }, - }) + .populate([ + { path: "event" }, + { path: "group" }, + { + path: "volunteer", + populate: { path: "user" }, + }, + ]) .lean();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return await VolunteerMembership.find({ volunteer: { $in: volunteerIds }, ...(status && { status }), }) .sort(sort) .populate([ { path: "event" }, { path: "group" }, { path: "volunteer", populate: { path: "user" }, }, ]) .lean(); };
73-92:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null references in membership filtering
When accessing nested properties like
membership.event.titleandmembership.volunteer.user, there is a risk of encounteringnullorundefinedvalues, which could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding null checks to ensure robustness.Apply this diff to add safety checks:
const eventTitleCondition = eventTitle - ? membership.event.title.includes(eventTitle) + ? membership.event?.title?.includes(eventTitle) : true; const fullName = membership.volunteer.user - ? membership.volunteer.user.firstName + ' ' + membership.volunteer.user.lastName - : ''; - const userNameCondition = userName - ? fullName.toLowerCase().includes(userName.toLowerCase()) + ? membership.volunteer.user.firstName + ' ' + membership.volunteer.user.lastName + : ''; + const userNameCondition = userName + ? fullName.toLowerCase().includes(userName.toLowerCase()) : true;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByUser.ts (5)
67-71:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks for 'actionItemCategory' to prevent runtime errors
While filtering based on
categoryName, ifitem.actionItemCategoryorcategory.nameisundefined, accessingcategory.name.toLowerCase()will cause a runtime error. Ensure thatactionItemCategoryandcategory.nameare defined before using them.Apply this diff to add null checks:
- return category.name.toLowerCase().includes(categoryName); + return category?.name?.toLowerCase()?.includes(categoryName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const categoryName = args.where.categoryName.toLowerCase(); filteredActionItems = filteredActionItems.filter((item) => { const category = item.actionItemCategory as InterfaceActionItemCategory; return category?.name?.toLowerCase()?.includes(categoryName); });
89-89:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks for 'assigneeGroup' to prevent runtime errors
Accessing
item.assigneeGroup.namewithout ensuringassigneeGroupis defined can lead to a runtime error ifassigneeGroupisundefined. Add a null check to prevent this issue.Apply this diff to add null checks:
- return item.assigneeGroup.name.toLowerCase().includes(assigneeName); + return item.assigneeGroup?.name?.toLowerCase()?.includes(assigneeName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return item.assigneeGroup?.name?.toLowerCase()?.includes(assigneeName);
82-87:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks for 'assigneeUser' to prevent runtime errors
When accessing
assigneeUser.firstNameandassigneeUser.lastName, ifassigneeUserisundefined, it will result in a runtime error. Ensure thatassigneeUseris defined before accessing its properties.Apply this diff to verify
assigneeUser:+ if (!assigneeUser) { + return false; + } const name = `${assigneeUser.firstName} ${assigneeUser.lastName}`.toLowerCase();Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
21-40:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'organization' is populated in 'event' to prevent undefined access
When accessing
tempEvent.organization._id, there is a risk thatorganizationis not populated on theevent. This could result intempEvent.organizationbeingundefined, leading to a runtime error. To prevent this, ensure thatorganizationis populated when fetching theevent.Apply this diff to populate
organizationonevent:- .populate("event") + .populate({ + path: "event", + populate: { path: "organization" }, + })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const volunteerObjects = await EventVolunteer.find({ user: args.userId, }) .populate({ path: "assignments", populate: [ { path: "creator" }, { path: "assignee", populate: { path: "user" }, }, { path: "assigneeGroup" }, { path: "assigner" }, { path: "actionItemCategory" }, { path: "organization" }, { path: "event" }, ], }) .populate({ path: "event", populate: { path: "organization" }, }) .lean();
98-106:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle undefined 'dueDate' fields during sorting to avoid NaN values
If
dueDateisundefined,new Date(dueDate)will be invalid, andgetTime()will returnNaN, causing the sorting to malfunction. Include checks to handle undefineddueDatevalues.Apply this diff to handle undefined
dueDate:- return new Date(b.dueDate).getTime() - new Date(a.dueDate).getTime(); + const dateA = new Date(a.dueDate).getTime() || 0; + const dateB = new Date(b.dueDate).getTime() || 0; + return dateB - dateA;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/utilities/checks.ts (2)
105-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using
findByIdinstead offindOnefor consistency and efficiency.Since you're querying by
_id, you can usefindById(groupId)to simplify the code and potentially improve performance.Apply this diff to make the change:
- const volunteerGroup = await EventVolunteerGroup.findOne({ - _id: groupId, - }); + const volunteerGroup = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(groupId);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const checkVolunteerGroupExists = async ( groupId: string, ): Promise<InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup> => { const volunteerGroup = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(groupId); if (!volunteerGroup) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } return volunteerGroup; };
59-82:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle case when
user.appUserProfileIdis undefined to prevent potential errors.If
user.appUserProfileIdis undefined, passing it tofindAppUserProfileCachemay lead to unexpected behavior or errors. Consider adding a check to ensureuser.appUserProfileIdis defined before proceeding.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
+ if (!user.appUserProfileId) { + throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( + requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), + USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, + USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, + ); + } const appUserProfileFoundInCache = await findAppUserProfileCache([ - user.appUserProfileId?.toString(), + user.appUserProfileId.toString(), ]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.user: InterfaceUser, ): Promise<InterfaceAppUserProfile> => { let currentUserAppProfile: InterfaceAppUserProfile | null; if (!user.appUserProfileId) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, ); } const appUserProfileFoundInCache = await findAppUserProfileCache([ user.appUserProfileId.toString(), ]); currentUserAppProfile = appUserProfileFoundInCache[0]; if (currentUserAppProfile === null) { currentUserAppProfile = await AppUserProfile.findOne({ userId: user._id, }).lean(); if (currentUserAppProfile !== null) { await cacheAppUserProfile([currentUserAppProfile]); } } if (!currentUserAppProfile) { throw new errors.UnauthorizedError( requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.MESSAGE), USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.CODE, USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED_ERROR.PARAM, ); } return currentUserAppProfile; };src/models/EventVolunteer.ts (3)
57-63:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect default value assignment for
groupsandassignmentsfieldsThe
default: []should be assigned at the field level rather than inside the array element definition. Assigning it inside the object does not set the default value for the array itself.Apply this diff to fix the default value assignment:
For
groups(lines 57-63):groups: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "EventVolunteerGroup", - default: [], }, ], +default: [],For
assignments(lines 83-89):assignments: [ { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "ActionItem", - default: [], }, ], +default: [],Also applies to: 83-89
53-55:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd
required: trueto theeventfieldThe
eventfield in the schema is missing therequired: trueattribute. Since theeventis essential for theEventVolunteerdocument, addingrequired: trueensures data integrity.Apply this diff to add the required attribute:
event: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "Event", + required: true, },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.event: { type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "Event", required: true, },
111-112:
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in index field name
There is a typo in the index definition:
hourHistory.dateshould behoursHistory.dateto match the actual field name in the schema.Apply this diff to correct the field name:
// Add index on hourHistory.date -eventVolunteerSchema.index({ "hourHistory.date": 1 }); +eventVolunteerSchema.index({ "hoursHistory.date": 1 });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Add index on hourHistory.date eventVolunteerSchema.index({ "hoursHistory.date": 1 });src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (4)
74-77:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null check for 'volunteer.event' to prevent runtime errors
The
volunteer.eventmay benullorundefined, which could cause a runtime error when accessingtempEvent.organization.toString(). Ensure thatvolunteer.eventis defined before accessing its properties.Apply this diff to add a null check:
volunteerProfiles.forEach((volunteer) => { - const tempEvent = volunteer.event as InterfaceEvent; - if (tempEvent.organization.toString() === orgId) + const tempEvent = volunteer.event as InterfaceEvent; + if (tempEvent && tempEvent.organization.toString() === orgId) { eventVolunteerGroups.push(...volunteer.groups); + } });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.volunteerProfiles.forEach((volunteer) => { const tempEvent = volunteer.event as InterfaceEvent; if (tempEvent && tempEvent.organization.toString() === orgId) { eventVolunteerGroups.push(...volunteer.groups); }
97-118: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle undefined 'args.orderBy' and add default sorting
If
args.orderByis undefined, the switch statement doesn't execute any case, leaving the array unsorted. Consider adding a default case or handling undefinedargs.orderByto ensure consistent behavior.Apply this diff to add a default case:
switch (args.orderBy) { case "members_ASC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => a.volunteers.length - b.volunteers.length, ); break; case "members_DESC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => b.volunteers.length - a.volunteers.length, ); break; case "assignments_ASC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => a.assignments.length - b.assignments.length, ); break; case "assignments_DESC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => b.assignments.length - a.assignments.length, ); break; + default: + // Optionally, sort by group name or any other default criteria + filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( + (a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name) + ); break; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
88-93:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for undefined 'tempLeader' to avoid errors
The
tempGroup.leadermight benullorundefined, which could cause an error when accessingfirstNameandlastName. Add a check to ensuretempLeaderis defined before using it.Apply this diff to add a null check:
const tempGroup = group as InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup; -const tempLeader = tempGroup.leader as InterfaceUser; -const { firstName, lastName } = tempLeader; -const name = `${firstName} ${lastName}`.toLowerCase(); -return name.includes(tempName); +const tempLeader = tempGroup.leader as InterfaceUser; +if (tempLeader) { + const { firstName, lastName } = tempLeader; + const name = `${firstName} ${lastName}`.toLowerCase(); + return name.includes(tempName); +} else { + return false; +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const tempGroup = group as InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup; const tempLeader = tempGroup.leader as InterfaceUser; if (tempLeader) { const { firstName, lastName } = tempLeader; const name = `${firstName} ${lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return name.includes(tempName); } else { return false; }
98-117:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'volunteers' and 'assignments' are defined before accessing 'length'
In the sorting functions,
a.volunteersora.assignmentsmight beundefined, leading to errors when accessinglength. Add default empty arrays or null checks to prevent runtime errors.Apply this diff to safely access
length:// For volunteers sorting -filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( - (a, b) => a.volunteers.length - b.volunteers.length, +filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( + (a, b) => (a.volunteers?.length || 0) - (b.volunteers?.length || 0), ); // For assignments sorting -filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( - (a, b) => a.assignments.length - b.assignments.length, +filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( + (a, b) => (a.assignments?.length || 0) - (b.assignments?.length || 0), );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.case "members_ASC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => (a.volunteers?.length || 0) - (b.volunteers?.length || 0), ); break; case "members_DESC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => (b.volunteers?.length || 0) - (a.volunteers?.length || 0), ); break; case "assignments_ASC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => (a.assignments?.length || 0) - (b.assignments?.length || 0), ); break; case "assignments_DESC": filteredEventVolunteerGroups = filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( (a, b) => (b.assignments?.length || 0) - (a.assignments?.length || 0), ); break;src/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.ts (4)
58-60:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove redundant
case "allTime"clause in the switch statementThe
case "allTime":clause is redundant because thedefaultcase handles it. Removing this case improves code clarity and eliminates unnecessary code.Apply this diff to remove the redundant case:
switch (timeFrame) { case "weekly": // ... break; case "monthly": // ... break; case "yearly": // ... break; - case "allTime": default: startDate = null; // No filtering for "allTime" endDate = null; break; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.default: startDate = null; // No filtering for "allTime"🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 58-58: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
136-145:
⚠️ Potential issueApply
limitafter filtering by name to ensure consistent resultsWhen
nameContainsis provided, the code returns the filtered list without applying thelimitparameter. This can lead to unexpected results if the filtered list exceeds the desired limit.Modify the code to apply
limitafter filtering by name:// Filter by name if (nameContains) { - return rankedVolunteers.filter((volunteer) => { + rankedVolunteers = rankedVolunteers.filter((volunteer) => { const fullName = `${volunteer.user.firstName} ${volunteer.user.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return fullName.includes(nameContains.toLowerCase()); }); } // Apply limit return limit ? rankedVolunteers.slice(0, limit) : rankedVolunteers;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Filter by name if (nameContains) { rankedVolunteers = rankedVolunteers.filter((volunteer) => { const fullName = `${volunteer.user.firstName} ${volunteer.user.lastName}`.toLowerCase(); return fullName.includes(nameContains.toLowerCase()); }); } // Apply limit return limit ? rankedVolunteers.slice(0, limit) : rankedVolunteers;
128-134:
⚠️ Potential issueAdjust ranking logic to maintain consistency after sorting
After assigning ranks to volunteers, the code re-sorts
rankedVolunteersbased on theorderByfield. This can cause therankproperty to no longer correspond to the volunteers' positions in the array, leading to confusion.Consider incorporating the
orderByparameter before assigning ranks to ensure consistency, or adjust the ranking logic to account for post-sorting.Apply this diff to sort before ranking:
-// Assign ranks, accounting for ties -const rankedVolunteers = []; -// Sorting happens here -... +// Sort the volunteerRanks based on the orderBy field before ranking +if (orderBy === "hours_ASC") { + volunteerRanks.sort((a, b) => a.hoursVolunteered - b.hoursVolunteered); +} else { + volunteerRanks.sort((a, b) => b.hoursVolunteered - a.hoursVolunteered); +} + +// Assign ranks, accounting for ties +const rankedVolunteers = [];Then, remove the post-ranking sort:
-// Sort the ranked volunteers based on the orderBy field - -if (orderBy === "hours_ASC") { - rankedVolunteers.sort((a, b) => a.hoursVolunteered - b.hoursVolunteered); -} else if (orderBy === "hours_DESC") { - rankedVolunteers.sort((a, b) => b.hoursVolunteered - a.hoursVolunteered); -}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
21-31:
⚠️ Potential issueDeduplicate
volunteerIdsto prevent double-counting hoursThe
volunteerIdsarray may contain duplicate IDs if volunteers participate in multiple events. This can lead to fetching the same volunteer multiple times and potentially double-counting their hours.Apply this diff to deduplicate the
volunteerIds:events.forEach((event) => { volunteerIds.push( ...event.volunteers.map((volunteer) => volunteer.toString()), ); }); +// Deduplicate volunteer IDs +const uniqueVolunteerIds = [...new Set(volunteerIds)];Then, update the subsequent query to use
uniqueVolunteerIds:const volunteers = await EventVolunteer.find({ - _id: { $in: volunteerIds }, + _id: { $in: uniqueVolunteerIds }, })Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteerGroup.ts (4)
50-51:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate
leaderIdandvolunteerUserIdsto ensure they existBefore proceeding, validate that
leaderIdand each ID involunteerUserIdscorrespond to existing users. This prevents issues arising from invalid user references.Add validation for
leaderId:// Validate the existence of the leader const leader = await checkUserExists(leaderId);And for
volunteerUserIds:// Validate the existence of volunteer users await Promise.all( volunteerUserIds.map(async (userId) => { await checkUserExists(userId); }), );
109-116:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle errors during bulk insertion of new volunteers
When using
EventVolunteer.insertMany, exceptions like validation errors or duplicates can occur. Wrap the operation in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully.Refactor the code to include error handling:
// Bulk Create New Volunteers if Needed let newVolunteers = []; try { newVolunteers = await EventVolunteer.insertMany( newVolunteerUserIds.map((userId) => ({ user: userId, event: eventId, creator: context.userId, groups: [], })), ); } catch (error) { // Handle errors appropriately throw new errors.DatabaseError(error.message); }
123-131:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent duplication of
VolunteerMembershiprecordsEnsure that you do not create duplicate
VolunteerMembershiprecords for volunteers who are already members. UsebulkWritewithupsertto avoid duplicates.Modify the insertion as follows:
// Bulk Upsert VolunteerMembership Records await VolunteerMembership.bulkWrite( allVolunteerIds.map((volunteerId) => ({ updateOne: { filter: { volunteer: volunteerId, group: createdVolunteerGroup._id, event: eventId, }, update: { $setOnInsert: { status: "invited" }, }, upsert: true, }, })), );
57-57: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use destructured
eventIdvariable for consistencyIn line 57, you're using
args.data.eventIdinstead of the destructuredeventId. For consistency and readability, it's preferable to use the already destructuredeventId.Apply this diff to make the change:
- const event = await Event.findById(args.data.eventId) + const event = await Event.findById(eventId)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (4)
185-185:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent handling of
assigneeType"User"The assignment includes a condition for
assigneeType === "User"when settingassigneeUser:assigneeUser: assigneeType === "User" ? assigneeId : undefined,However, there is no corresponding logic earlier in the code to fetch and validate the
UserwhenassigneeTypeis"User". This inconsistency may lead to issues ifassigneeTypeis"User".To address this, consider adding a validation block for
assigneeType === "User":} else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { // Existing logic for EventVolunteerGroup ... + } else if (assigneeType === "User") { + assignee = await User.findById(assigneeId).lean(); + if (!assignee) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError( + `User not found with id: ${assigneeId}`, + 'USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR', + 'assigneeId', + ); + } } else { throw new errors.BadRequestError( `Unsupported assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`, 'UNSUPPORTED_ASSIGNEE_TYPE', 'assigneeType', ); }Ensure that you import the
Usermodel at the top of your file:import { ActionItem, ActionItemCategory, Event, + User, EventVolunteer, EventVolunteerGroup, } from "../../models";
66-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include
actionItemCategoryIdin destructuring for consistencyIn the destructuring of
args.data,actionItemCategoryIdis not included, but it's used later in the code asargs.actionItemCategoryId. For consistency and readability, consider including it in the destructuring.Modify the destructuring as follows:
const { assigneeId, assigneeType, preCompletionNotes, allotedHours, dueDate, eventId, + actionItemCategoryId, } = args.data;Then, update the usage accordingly:
const actionItemCategory = await ActionItemCategory.findOne({ - _id: args.actionItemCategoryId, + _id: actionItemCategoryId, }).lean();Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
197-218:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle unsupported
assigneeTypevalues when updating assignmentsSimilar to the earlier logic, the code updates assignments based on
assigneeTypebeing"EventVolunteer"or"EventVolunteerGroup", but does not handle other possible values. IfassigneeTypeis an unsupported value, this block will silently skip updating assignments, which may cause inconsistencies.Add an
elseclause to handle unsupportedassigneeTypevalues:); } + } else { + throw new errors.BadRequestError( + `Unsupported assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`, + 'UNSUPPORTED_ASSIGNEE_TYPE', + 'assigneeType', + ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Adds the new action item to the assignee's assignments. // If the assignee is a volunteer group, adds the action item to the group's assignments and to each volunteer's assignments. if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { await EventVolunteer.findByIdAndUpdate(assigneeId, { $addToSet: { assignments: createActionItem._id }, }); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { const newGrp = (await EventVolunteerGroup.findByIdAndUpdate( assigneeId, { $addToSet: { assignments: createActionItem._id }, }, { new: true }, ).lean()) as InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup; await EventVolunteer.updateMany( { _id: { $in: newGrp.volunteers } }, { $addToSet: { assignments: createActionItem._id }, }, ); } else { throw new errors.BadRequestError( `Unsupported assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`, 'UNSUPPORTED_ASSIGNEE_TYPE', 'assigneeType', ); }
75-94:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle unsupported
assigneeTypevalues to prevent errorsCurrently, the code handles
assigneeTypevalues of"EventVolunteer"and"EventVolunteerGroup", but does not account for other potential values. If an unsupportedassigneeTypeis provided,assigneewill remainundefined, which may lead to unexpected behaviors or runtime errors later in the code.To ensure robustness, consider adding an
elseclause to handle unsupportedassigneeTypevalues:} else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { assignee = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); if (!assignee) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } + } else { + throw new errors.BadRequestError( + `Unsupported assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`, + 'UNSUPPORTED_ASSIGNEE_TYPE', + 'assigneeType', + ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let assignee: InterfaceEventVolunteer | InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup | null; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { assignee = await EventVolunteer.findById(assigneeId) .populate("user") .lean(); if (!assignee) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { assignee = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); if (!assignee) { throw new errors.NotFoundError( requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, ); } } else { throw new errors.BadRequestError( `Unsupported assigneeType: ${assigneeType}`, 'UNSUPPORTED_ASSIGNEE_TYPE', 'assigneeType', ); }src/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.ts (4)
85-90:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle unexpected
assigneeTypevalues to prevent potential errorsThe current logic assumes that
assigneeTypewill always be"EventVolunteer","EventVolunteerGroup", or"User". If an unexpectedassigneeTypeis provided,actionItem.assigneeUsermay beundefined, leading toCannot read property 'toString' of undefinederrors.Consider adding a default case or input validation to handle unexpected
assigneeTypevalues:sameAssignee = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId( assigneeType === "EventVolunteer" ? actionItem.assignee.toString() : assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup" - ? actionItem.assigneeGroup.toString() - : actionItem.assigneeUser.toString(), + ? actionItem.assigneeGroup.toString() + : assigneeType === "User" + ? actionItem.assigneeUser.toString() + : (() => { throw new errors.InvalidInputError('Invalid assigneeType provided.'); })(), ).equals(assigneeId);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.assigneeType === "EventVolunteer" ? actionItem.assignee.toString() : assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup" ? actionItem.assigneeGroup.toString() : assigneeType === "User" ? actionItem.assigneeUser.toString() : (() => { throw new errors.InvalidInputError('Invalid assigneeType provided.'); })(), ).equals(assigneeId);
239-239:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent division by zero when calculating
dividedHoursIf
volunteerGroup.volunteers.lengthis zero, dividing by zero will result inInfinity. This can lead to incorrect updates or runtime errors.Add a check to handle cases where there are no volunteers:
const dividedHours = - (actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0) / volunteerGroup.volunteers.length; + volunteerGroup.volunteers.length + ? (actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0) / volunteerGroup.volunteers.length + : 0; +if (dividedHours === 0) { + // Optional: Decide how to handle this case, such as skipping the update or logging a warning. +}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
93-128: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor assignee retrieval to eliminate code duplication
The logic for retrieving the assignee based on
assigneeTypeis repetitive. Refactoring this into a helper function will improve readability and maintainability.Create a helper function to fetch the assignee:
+const getAssignee = async (assigneeType: string, assigneeId: string) => { + if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { + const assignee = await EventVolunteer.findById(assigneeId) + .populate("user") + .lean(); + if (!assignee) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError( + requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, + ); + } + return assignee; + } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { + const assignee = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); + if (!assignee) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError( + requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, + ); + } + return assignee; + } else if (assigneeType === "User") { + const assignee = await User.findById(assigneeId).lean(); + if (!assignee) { + throw new errors.NotFoundError( + requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), + USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, + USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, + ); + } + return assignee; + } else { + throw new errors.InvalidInputError('Invalid assigneeType provided.'); + } +}; if (!sameAssignee) { - let assignee: - | InterfaceEventVolunteer - | InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup - | InterfaceUser - | null; - if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { - assignee = await EventVolunteer.findById(assigneeId) - .populate("user") - .lean(); - if (!assignee) { - throw new errors.NotFoundError( - requestContext.translate(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, - ); - } - } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { - assignee = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); - if (!assignee) { - throw new errors.NotFoundError( - requestContext.translate( - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE, - ), - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, - ); - } - } else if (assigneeType === "User") { - assignee = await User.findById(assigneeId).lean(); - if (!assignee) { - throw new errors.NotFoundError( - requestContext.translate(USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE), - USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.CODE, - USER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.PARAM, - ); - } - } + const assignee = await getAssignee(assigneeType, assigneeId); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
191-280: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate volunteer hours update logic to adhere to DRY principle
The code for updating
hoursVolunteeredandhoursHistoryforEventVolunteerandEventVolunteerGroupis duplicated with minor differences. Refactoring this into a shared function will reduce redundancy and enhance maintainability.Create a function to update volunteer hours:
+const updateVolunteerHours = async ( + assigneeType: string, + assigneeId: string, + isCompleted: boolean, + allottedHours: number, + volunteers?: string[], +) => { + const hoursChange = isCompleted ? allottedHours : -allottedHours; + const hoursHistoryEntry = { + hours: hoursChange, + date: new Date(), + }; + const update = { + $inc: { + hoursVolunteered: hoursChange || 0, + }, + ...(allottedHours + ? { + $push: { + hoursHistory: hoursHistoryEntry, + }, + } + : {}), + }; + + if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { + await EventVolunteer.findByIdAndUpdate(assigneeId, update); + } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup" && volunteers) { + await EventVolunteer.updateMany({ _id: { $in: volunteers } }, update); + } +}; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { - const assignee = await EventVolunteer.findById(assigneeId).lean(); - if (assignee) { - if (isCompleted == true) { - await EventVolunteer.findByIdAndUpdate(assigneeId, { - $inc: { - hoursVolunteered: actionItem.allotedHours - ? actionItem.allotedHours - : 0, - }, - ...(actionItem.allotedHours - ? { - $push: { - hoursHistory: { - hours: actionItem.allotedHours, - date: new Date(), - }, - }, - } - : {}), - }); - } else if (isCompleted == false) { - await EventVolunteer.findByIdAndUpdate(assigneeId, { - $inc: { - hoursVolunteered: actionItem.allotedHours - ? -actionItem.allotedHours - : -0, - }, - ...(actionItem.allotedHours - ? { - $push: { - hoursHistory: { - hours: -actionItem.allotedHours, - date: new Date(), - }, - }, - } - : {}), - }); - } - } + await updateVolunteerHours( + assigneeType, + assigneeId, + isCompleted, + actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0, + ); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { const volunteerGroup = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); if (volunteerGroup) { - const dividedHours = - (actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0) / volunteerGroup.volunteers.length; - if (isCompleted == true) { - await EventVolunteer.updateMany( - { _id: { $in: volunteerGroup.volunteers } }, - { - $inc: { - hoursVolunteered: dividedHours, - }, - ...(dividedHours - ? { - $push: { - hoursHistory: { - hours: dividedHours, - date: new Date(), - }, - }, - } - : {}), - }, - ); - } else if (isCompleted == false) { - await EventVolunteer.updateMany( - { _id: { $in: volunteerGroup.volunteers } }, - { - $inc: { - hoursVolunteered: -dividedHours, - }, - ...(dividedHours - ? { - $push: { - hoursHistory: { - hours: -dividedHours, - date: new Date(), - }, - }, - } - : {}), - }, - ); - } + const dividedHours = volunteerGroup.volunteers.length + ? (actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0) / volunteerGroup.volunteers.length + : 0; + await updateVolunteerHours( + assigneeType, + assigneeId, + isCompleted, + dividedHours, + volunteerGroup.volunteers, + ); } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// checks if the assignee is an event volunteer then add alloted hours to the volunteer else if event volunteer group then add divided equal alloted hours to all volunteers in the group const updateVolunteerHours = async ( assigneeType: string, assigneeId: string, isCompleted: boolean, allottedHours: number, volunteers?: string[], ) => { const hoursChange = isCompleted ? allottedHours : -allottedHours; const hoursHistoryEntry = { hours: hoursChange, date: new Date(), }; const update = { $inc: { hoursVolunteered: hoursChange || 0, }, ...(allottedHours ? { $push: { hoursHistory: hoursHistoryEntry, }, } : {}), }; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { await EventVolunteer.findByIdAndUpdate(assigneeId, update); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup" && volunteers) { await EventVolunteer.updateMany({ _id: { $in: volunteers } }, update); } }; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { await updateVolunteerHours( assigneeType, assigneeId, isCompleted, actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0, ); } else if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteerGroup") { const volunteerGroup = await EventVolunteerGroup.findById(assigneeId).lean(); if (volunteerGroup) { const dividedHours = volunteerGroup.volunteers.length ? (actionItem.allotedHours ?? 0) / volunteerGroup.volunteers.length : 0; await updateVolunteerHours( assigneeType, assigneeId, isCompleted, dividedHours, volunteerGroup.volunteers, ); } }src/typeDefs/types.ts (2)
317-324: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Recommend using an enum for the
statusfield inVolunteerMembershipThe
statusfield is currently aString!, which may lead to inconsistencies or invalid values. Using an enum type enhances type safety by restrictingstatusto predefined values.Apply this diff to define an enum and update the
statusfield:+enum VolunteerMembershipStatus { + PENDING + ACCEPTED + REJECTED +} type VolunteerMembership { _id: ID! - status: String! + status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! volunteer: EventVolunteer! event: Event! group: EventVolunteerGroup createdAt: DateTime! updatedAt: DateTime! }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.enum VolunteerMembershipStatus { PENDING ACCEPTED REJECTED } type VolunteerMembership { _id: ID! status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! volunteer: EventVolunteer! event: Event! group: EventVolunteerGroup createdAt: DateTime! updatedAt: DateTime! }
74-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a union type for
assigneefieldsCurrently, the
ActionItemtype includes multiple fields to represent the assignee:assignee,assigneeGroup,assigneeUser, andassigneeType. Consider simplifying this by using a union typeAssignee, which can be one ofEventVolunteer,EventVolunteerGroup, orUser. This approach enhances schema flexibility and clarity.Apply this diff to implement the union type:
+union Assignee = EventVolunteer | EventVolunteerGroup | User type ActionItem { _id: ID! - assignee: EventVolunteer - assigneeGroup: EventVolunteerGroup - assigneeUser: User - assigneeType: String! + assignee: Assignee assigner: User actionItemCategory: ActionItemCategory preCompletionNotes: String postCompletionNotes: String allotedHours: Float assignmentDate: Date! dueDate: Date! completionDate: Date! isCompleted: Boolean! event: Event creator: User createdAt: Date! updatedAt: Date! }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.union Assignee = EventVolunteer | EventVolunteerGroup | User type ActionItem { _id: ID! assignee: Assignee assigner: User actionItemCategory: ActionItemCategory preCompletionNotes: String postCompletionNotes: String allotedHours: Float assignmentDate: Date! dueDate: Date! completionDate: Date! isCompleted: Boolean! event: Event creator: User createdAt: Date! updatedAt: Date! }tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (4)
68-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve destructuring assignment for better readability
Using multiple commas in destructuring to skip elements can reduce code readability. Consider returning an object from
createTestVolunteerAndGroup()to extract only the needed properties.Here is how you might adjust the function and assignment:
In
createTestVolunteerAndGroup()function, return an object:return { tVolunteer, tVolunteerGroup };Then, in your test setup:
const { tVolunteer, tVolunteerGroup } = await createTestVolunteerAndGroup();This enhances clarity and makes the code easier to maintain.
254-281:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd assertions and error handling in the test
In this test case, there are two issues:
Lack of Assertions: After calling
updateActionItemResolver, there are no assertions to verify that the action items were updated correctly. Tests should include assertions to validate the expected outcomes.Improper Error Handling: The
catchblock simply logs the error but does not fail the test. If an error occurs, the test should fail to indicate that the code is not behaving as expected.Consider updating the test to include assertions and proper error handling. For example:
try { await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args, context); const updatedActionItem = await ActionItem.findById(args.id); expect(updatedActionItem?.isCompleted).toBe(true); await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args2, context); const updatedActionItem2 = await ActionItem.findById(args2.id); expect(updatedActionItem2?.isCompleted).toBe(true); } catch (error: unknown) { fail(`Test failed with error: ${error}`); }This ensures that the test validates the expected behavior and fails appropriately if an error occurs.
284-339:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd assertions and proper error handling in the test
The test lacks assertions to confirm that the action items are updated as not completed. Additionally, the
catchblock only logs the error without failing the test.Update the test to include assertions and fail the test if an error occurs. For example:
try { await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args, context); const updatedActionItem = await ActionItem.findById(args.id); expect(updatedActionItem?.isCompleted).toBe(false); await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args2, context); const updatedActionItem2 = await ActionItem.findById(args2.id); expect(updatedActionItem2?.isCompleted).toBe(false); } catch (error: unknown) { fail(`Test failed with error: ${error}`); }This improves the test by verifying the expected outcome and ensuring that failures are appropriately reported.
399-451:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing assertions and improve error handling
The test aims to update action items to set them as not completed (Volunteer Group), but it lacks assertions and proper error handling.
Include assertions after each update to check that
isCompletedis set to the expected value. Also, update thecatchblock to fail the test upon encountering an error.Example:
try { await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args, context); const updatedActionItem = await ActionItem.findById(args.id); expect(updatedActionItem?.isCompleted).toBe(false); await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args2, context); const updatedActionItem2 = await ActionItem.findById(args2.id); expect(updatedActionItem2?.isCompleted).toBe(false); } catch (error: unknown) { fail(`Test failed with error: ${error}`); }This makes the test more robust and reliable.
schema.graphql (9)
9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
assigneeTypeinstead ofString!.Defining
assigneeTypeas aString!may lead to inconsistent values and potential errors. Using an enum ensures that only predefined, valid assignee types are used, enhancing type safety and preventing invalid assignments.Define an enum, for example:
enum AssigneeType { USER GROUP VOLUNTEER }Update the
ActionItemtype:type ActionItem { _id: ID! actionItemCategory: ActionItemCategory allotedHours: Float assignee: EventVolunteer assigneeGroup: EventVolunteerGroup - assigneeType: String! + assigneeType: AssigneeType! assigneeUser: User assigner: User assignmentDate: Date! completionDate: Date! createdAt: Date! creator: User dueDate: Date! event: Event isCompleted: Boolean! postCompletionNotes: String preCompletionNotes: String updatedAt: Date! }
1215-1215: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
statusinupdateVolunteerMembership.To ensure only valid statuses are used, define
statusas an enum rather than aString!.Define the enum:
enum VolunteerMembershipStatus { PENDING ACCEPTED REJECTED }Update the mutation:
- updateVolunteerMembership(id: ID!, status: String!): VolunteerMembership! + updateVolunteerMembership(id: ID!, status: VolunteerMembershipStatus!): VolunteerMembership!
2093-2098: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using enums for
orderByandtimeFrameinVolunteerRankWhereInput.Using enums improves type safety and ensures only valid values are used for ordering and time frame selection.
Define the enums:
enum VolunteerRankOrderBy { HOURS_VOLUNTEERED_ASC HOURS_VOLUNTEERED_DESC RANK_ASC RANK_DESC } enum TimeFrame { DAILY WEEKLY MONTHLY YEARLY ALL_TIME }Update the input type:
input VolunteerRankWhereInput { limit: Int nameContains: String - orderBy: String! + orderBy: VolunteerRankOrderBy! - timeFrame: String! + timeFrame: TimeFrame! }
782-787:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify consistency of field names in
EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput.The enum includes
members_ASCandmembers_DESC, but theEventVolunteerGrouptype usesvolunteersas the field name. Ensure that the field names in the enum match the actual type fields to avoid errors.Consider updating the enum to:
enum EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput { assignments_ASC assignments_DESC - members_ASC - members_DESC + volunteers_ASC + volunteers_DESC }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.enum EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput { assignments_ASC assignments_DESC volunteers_ASC volunteers_DESC }
2078-2085: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure
statusfield inVolunteerMembershipWhereInputaligns with enum type.For consistency, use the
VolunteerMembershipStatusenum forstatusin the where input.Update the input type:
input VolunteerMembershipWhereInput { eventId: ID eventTitle: String filter: String - status: String + status: VolunteerMembershipStatus userId: ID userName: String }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.input VolunteerMembershipWhereInput { eventId: ID eventTitle: String filter: String status: VolunteerMembershipStatus userId: ID userName: String }
314-314: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
assigneeTypeinCreateActionItemInput.To maintain consistency and prevent invalid input values, use the
AssigneeTypeenum forassigneeTypein theCreateActionItemInput.Update the input type:
input CreateActionItemInput { allotedHours: Float assigneeId: ID! - assigneeType: String! + assigneeType: AssigneeType! dueDate: Date eventId: ID preCompletionNotes: String }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
2056-2064: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
statusinVolunteerMembership.Defining
statusas an enum ensures consistency and prevents invalid status values.Define the enum
VolunteerMembershipStatusif not already defined, and update the type:type VolunteerMembership { _id: ID! createdAt: DateTime! event: Event! group: EventVolunteerGroup - status: String! + status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! updatedAt: DateTime! volunteer: EventVolunteer! }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
2066-2071: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use an enum for
statusinVolunteerMembershipInput.Using the
VolunteerMembershipStatusenum forstatusenhances input validation.Update the input type:
input VolunteerMembershipInput { event: ID! group: ID - status: String! + status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! userId: ID! }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.input VolunteerMembershipInput { event: ID! group: ID status: VolunteerMembershipStatus! userId: ID! }
1689-1689: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
assigneeTypeinUpdateActionItemInput.Consistent with earlier suggestions, using an enum enhances type safety for
assigneeType.Update the input type:
input UpdateActionItemInput { allotedHours: Float assigneeId: ID - assigneeType: String + assigneeType: AssigneeType completionDate: Date dueDate: Date isCompleted: Boolean postCompletionNotes: String preCompletionNotes: String }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (5)
75-78:
⚠️ Potential issueChanging 'assignee' field type may introduce breaking changes
The
assigneefield in theActionItemtype has been changed fromUsertoEventVolunteer, and new fieldsassigneeGroup,assigneeType, andassigneeUserhave been added. This change may break existing clients that expectassigneeto be of typeUser. Consider maintaining backward compatibility or providing clear migration instructions.
827-827:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential circular reference between 'EventVolunteer' and 'ActionItem'
The
EventVolunteertype includes anassignmentsfield of typeActionItem, andActionItemreferencesassigneeof typeEventVolunteer. Be cautious of potential circular dependencies or infinite recursion when resolving these fields.
843-843:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential circular reference between 'EventVolunteerGroup' and 'ActionItem'
The
EventVolunteerGrouptype now includes anassignmentsfield of typeActionItem, andActionItemreferencesassigneeGroupof typeEventVolunteerGroup. Ensure this does not cause circular dependencies or infinite recursion during field resolution.
864-868:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify correctness of 'EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInput' fields
The
EventVolunteerGroupOrderByInputincludesassignments_ASC,assignments_DESC,members_ASC, andmembers_DESC. Sinceassignmentsandmembersare arrays, ordering by these fields may not behave as expected. Consider whether these fields are appropriate for ordering, or if alternative scalar fields should be used.
389-389: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider defining 'assigneeType' as an enum
The
assigneeTypefield inCreateActionItemInputis currently defined asScalars['String']['input']. To enhance type safety and limit the values to predefined options, consider defining an enum type forassigneeType.Apply this diff to define an enum:
+export type AssigneeType = + | 'USER' + | 'VOLUNTEER' + | 'GROUP'; + export type CreateActionItemInput = { allotedHours?: InputMaybe<Scalars['Float']['input']>; assigneeId: Scalars['ID']['input']; - assigneeType: Scalars['String']['input']; + assigneeType: AssigneeType; dueDate?: InputMaybe<Scalars['Date']['input']>; eventId?: InputMaybe<Scalars['ID']['input']>; preCompletionNotes?: InputMaybe<Scalars['String']['input']>; };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getSort.spec.ts (1)
67-68: Consider adding test cases for additional volunteer-related fields.The test cases for
hoursVolunteeredsorting look good and follow the established pattern. However, since this PR introduces volunteer management features, consider adding test cases for other relevant fields that might need sorting (e.g., volunteer status, join date, etc.).tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-357: Consider adding test cases for complex volunteer queries.The test suite thoroughly covers basic field transformations, but given the PR's focus on volunteer leaderboard and group membership features, consider adding test cases for:
- Combined filters (e.g.,
hasAcceptedwith other fields)- Sorting criteria for volunteer rankings
- Group membership status filters
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/utilities/adminCheck.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getSort.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/utilities/adminCheck.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getSort.spec.ts (3)
12-14: LGTM! New OrderByInput types align with volunteer management features.The added types support the sorting functionality for action items, event volunteers, and volunteer memberships as outlined in the PR objectives.
83-86: LGTM! Type union properly extended with new OrderByInput types.The type union is correctly updated to include the new OrderByInput types, maintaining type safety for the getSort function.
Line range hint
91-99: Verify error handling for new OrderByInput types.While the file includes general error handling tests for unknown and undefined values, it would be beneficial to verify that invalid values specific to the new volunteer-related fields are handled correctly.
tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.ts (3)
16-16: LGTM: Type import addition is consistent with PR objectives.The addition of
EventVolunteerWhereInputaligns with the PR's goal of implementing volunteer management features.
34-35: LGTM: Type definition update properly includes new volunteer-related input.The test case type definition correctly incorporates
EventVolunteerWhereInputin the union type, maintaining type safety for the test cases.
342-343: Verify the completeness of volunteer-related test cases.While the added test cases for
hasAcceptedare good, consider if additional test cases are needed for other volunteer-related fields mentioned in the PR objectives (e.g., group membership status, ranking criteria).✅ Verification successful
Based on the schema and code review, I can now generate the final response:
Test coverage for EventVolunteer filtering is sufficient.
The test cases for
hasAcceptedfield are appropriate and complete as they cover both true and false scenarios. Looking at the EventVolunteer type in the schema and the getWhere implementation:
- The only filterable field defined in EventVolunteerWhereInput is
hasAccepted(along with common fields like id)- The test file includes test cases for:
hasAccepted: truehasAccepted: falseOther fields in EventVolunteer type like assignments, groups, hoursVolunteered etc. are relationships or computed fields that are not meant to be used for filtering in the where clause.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential missing test cases by examining the EventVolunteerWhereInput type definition # Look for other fields in EventVolunteerWhereInput that might need test coverage rg -t typescript "type EventVolunteerWhereInput" -A 20Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for type definitions related to EventVolunteer filtering/where conditions rg -l "EventVolunteer.*Where" # Then examine the test file content to understand existing test coverage rg -t ts "describe.*getWhere" -A 5Length of output: 746
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the schema to understand all possible filter conditions for EventVolunteer cat schema.graphql # Also check the test file content to see existing test cases cat tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.tsLength of output: 53660
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the EventVolunteer type and related fields in the schema rg -A 5 "type EventVolunteer" schema.graphql # Also check the implementation of getWhere function to understand what fields it supports cat src/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.tsLength of output: 18574
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/resolvers/Event/actionItems.ts (1)
17-19: Consider adding type safety to the query filter.While the code works correctly, we could enhance type safety by explicitly typing the filter object.
- return await ActionItem.find({ - event: parent._id, - }).lean(); + return await ActionItem.find<ActionItem>({ + event: parent._id, + }).lean();tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeOrganization.spec.ts (1)
149-149: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases for volunteer scenarios.The addition of
assigneeType: "EventVolunteer"aligns with the PR objectives of integrating volunteers with action items.Consider adding test cases to verify:
- Cleanup of volunteer-related data when removing an organization
- Behavior with different
assigneeTypevalues (e.g., "EventVolunteerGroup")- Validation of the
assigneeTypefield in the action itemExample test case structure:
it('removes the organization and cleans up volunteer-related data', async () => { // Setup volunteer data const testVolunteer = await createTestVolunteer(); const testVolunteerGroup = await createTestVolunteerGroup(); // Create action items with different assignee types const volunteerActionItem = await ActionItem.create({ // ... existing fields ... assigneeType: "EventVolunteer", assignee: testVolunteer._id }); const groupActionItem = await ActionItem.create({ // ... existing fields ... assigneeType: "EventVolunteerGroup", assignee: testVolunteerGroup._id }); // Remove organization const removeOrganizationPayload = await removeOrganizationResolver( {}, { id: testOrganization._id }, { userId: testUsers[0]?._id } ); // Verify cleanup const deletedVolunteerData = await Promise.all([ Volunteer.findById(testVolunteer._id), VolunteerGroup.findById(testVolunteerGroup._id), ActionItem.find({ organization: testOrganization._id, assigneeType: { $in: ["EventVolunteer", "EventVolunteerGroup"] } }) ]); expect(deletedVolunteerData).toEqual([null, null, []]); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/resolvers/Event/actionItems.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/removeOrganization.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.spec.ts (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteerGroup.spec.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/Event/actionItems.spec.ts (1)
28-32: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.The current test only covers the happy path. Consider adding test cases for:
- Edge cases (null/invalid event)
- New volunteer-related functionality (verifying action items assigned to volunteers)
- Filtering/sorting capabilities mentioned in PR objectives
This will ensure the resolver behaves correctly under various scenarios.
Would you like me to help generate additional test cases to improve coverage?
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (2)
29-31: Consider improving the clarity of test data setup.The destructuring assignment skips several values without clear indication of what they represent. Consider using named variables or adding comments to explain the skipped values.
- const [, event, user1, user2, volunteer1, , volunteerGroup, , ,] = + // Destructure values: [unused, event, user1, user2, volunteer1, unusedVolunteer2, volunteerGroup, unusedGroup2, unusedGroup3] + const [, event, user1, user2, volunteer1, , volunteerGroup] = await createVolunteerAndActions();
38-60: Consider adding test data validation.The test setup inserts multiple VolunteerMembership records with different statuses, but there's no validation to ensure the insertions were successful.
+ const insertedMemberships = await VolunteerMembership.insertMany([ - await VolunteerMembership.insertMany([ { event: testEvent?._id, volunteer: testEventVolunteer1._id, status: "invited", }, // ... other memberships ]); + expect(insertedMemberships).toHaveLength(4);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/resolvers/Event/actionItems.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/resolvers/Event/actionItems.spec.ts (1)
29-29: LGTM! Field name change aligns with schema updates.The change from
eventIdtoeventcorrectly reflects the updated ActionItem schema structure.tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (2)
3-15: LGTM! Imports and setup are well-structured.The imports correctly include all necessary dependencies for volunteer management testing, and the translation mock is properly configured.
68-117: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance test coverage for comprehensive validation.
While the existing tests cover basic functionality, consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid volunteer/event IDs
- Different membership statuses affecting update behavior
- Edge cases in assignments array
- Validation of assignment data structure
- Concurrent updates to the same volunteer
This would ensure robust validation of the volunteer management features described in the PR objectives.
Let's check if there are any existing tests for these scenarios:
Here's a template for additional test cases:
it('throws error for invalid volunteer ID', async () => { const invalidId = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId(); await expect( updateEventVolunteer( {}, { id: invalidId, data: { isPublic: false } }, { userId: testUser1?._id.toString() } ) ).rejects.toThrow(); }); it('validates assignment data structure', async () => { await expect( updateEventVolunteer( {}, { id: testEventVolunteer1?._id, data: { assignments: [{ /* invalid structure */ }] } }, { userId: testUser1?._id.toString() } ) ).rejects.toThrow(); });
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2615 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.54% 98.59% +0.04%
===========================================
Files 349 348 -1
Lines 17087 17680 +593
Branches 2457 2571 +114
===========================================
+ Hits 16838 17431 +593
Misses 244 244
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (2)
14-19: Consider adding type annotations for test variables.While the types are inferred, explicit type annotations would improve code readability and maintainability.
-let MONGOOSE_INSTANCE: typeof mongoose; -let testEvent: TestEventType; -let testUser1: TestUserType; -let testEventVolunteer1: TestEventVolunteerType; -let testEventVolunteerGroup: TestEventVolunteerGroupType; +let MONGOOSE_INSTANCE: typeof mongoose; +let testEvent: TestEventType | null; +let testUser1: TestUserType | null; +let testEventVolunteer1: TestEventVolunteerType | null; +let testEventVolunteerGroup: TestEventVolunteerGroupType | null;
20-53: Consider adding cleanup for inserted memberships.The
beforeAllsetup creates multiple test memberships, but there's no corresponding cleanup inafterAll.Add this cleanup to the afterAll block:
await VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ event: testEvent?._id });src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
55-64: Enhance function documentation.The JSDoc comments should include more details about:
- Valid status transitions
- Authorization requirements
- Possible error conditions
Here's the suggested documentation:
/** * Updates a Volunteer Membership status * @param _parent - parent of current request * @param args - payload provided with the request * @param context - context of entire application * * @remarks * Authorization: * - Organization admins can update any membership * - Users can only update their own membership requests * * Valid status transitions: * - requested → accepted/rejected (admin only) * - invited → accepted/rejected (user only) * * @throws {Error} When: * - User doesn't exist * - Membership doesn't exist * - User is not authorized * - Invalid status transition * - Database update fails */src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (1)
18-41: Consider implementing pagination for better performance.The deep population of multiple nested fields (
volunteers,assignments) combined with.lean()could be expensive for large datasets. Consider implementing pagination to limit the amount of data fetched at once.Example implementation:
interface PaginationArgs { limit?: number; offset?: number; } // Add to args const { limit = 10, offset = 0 } = args.pagination || {}; // Add to query .skip(offset) .limit(limit)tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts (2)
26-49: Consider adding error handling in the beforeAll setup.While the setup is comprehensive, consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potential creation failures gracefully and provide better error messages during test setup.
beforeAll(async () => { MONGOOSE_INSTANCE = await connect(); + try { const [organization, event, user1, , volunteer1, , volunteerGroup] = await createVolunteerAndActions(); testOrganization = organization; testEvent = event; testUser1 = user1; testEventVolunteer1 = volunteer1; testVolunteerGroup1 = volunteerGroup; testVolunteerGroup2 = await EventVolunteerGroup.create({ creator: testUser1?._id, event: testEvent?._id, volunteers: [testEventVolunteer1?._id], leader: testUser1?._id, assignments: [], name: "Test Volunteer Group 2", }); await EventVolunteer.updateOne( { _id: testEventVolunteer1?._id }, { groups: [testVolunteerGroup1?._id, testVolunteerGroup2?._id] }, { new: true, }, ); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to setup test environment:', error); + throw error; + } });
57-128: Fix typo and consider adding more test cases.
- There's a typo in the test description:
- it(`getEventVolunteerGroups - eventId, orderBy is assignements_DESC`, async () => { + it(`getEventVolunteerGroups - eventId, orderBy is assignments_DESC`, async () => {
- Consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:
- Invalid input validation (e.g., malformed IDs)
- Pagination parameters
- Combined filters with sorting
- Edge cases (empty groups, max members)
The existing test cases provide good coverage of the happy paths and basic error scenarios.
src/utilities/checks.ts (1)
34-54: Consider handling cache race conditions.The current implementation might face a race condition when multiple requests try to update the cache simultaneously. Consider implementing a cache-aside pattern with proper locking mechanism or using a distributed caching solution.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (2)
Line range hint
31-74: Update JSDoc to document all parameters.The JSDoc comments are missing documentation for the
allotedHoursparameter in thedataobject.Add the missing parameter documentation:
* - `assigneeType`: The type of the assignee (EventVolunteer or EventVolunteerGroup). * - `preCompletionNotes`: Notes to be added before the action item is completed. * - `dueDate`: The due date for the action item. * - `eventId` (optional): The ID of the event associated with the action item. +* - `allotedHours`: The number of hours allotted for the action item. * - `actionItemCategoryId`: The ID of the action item category.
Line range hint
166-178: Remove c8 ignore comments and add test coverage.The authorization check block is marked to be ignored by the code coverage tool. This suggests missing test cases for this critical security check.
Please add test cases to cover the authorization scenarios and remove the c8 ignore comments.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (2)
86-102: Enhance test description and assertions for EventVolunteer Not Found.The test case could be more descriptive and include additional assertions.
Consider this improvement:
-it(`throws EventVolunteer Not Found`, async () => { +it('should throw EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR when assignee volunteer does not exist', async () => { try { await createActionItem?.(/* ... */); fail('Expected error to be thrown'); } catch (error: unknown) { expect((error as Error).message).toEqual(EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE); + expect(error instanceof Error).toBeTruthy(); + expect((error as Error).name).toBe('Error'); } });
191-206: Enhance success test cases with more comprehensive assertions.The success test cases could verify more properties of the created action items.
Consider adding these assertions to each success test:
expect(createdItem).toMatchObject({ creator: testUser1?._id, assigneeId: expect.any(mongoose.Types.ObjectId), assigneeType: expect.stringMatching(/^(EventVolunteer|EventVolunteerGroup|User)$/), actionItemCategory: expect.any(mongoose.Types.ObjectId), isCompleted: false, createdAt: expect.any(Date), updatedAt: expect.any(Date), });Also applies to: 209-225, 227-241
tests/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.spec.ts (2)
57-84: Consider extracting the time offset to a constant.The magic number "1" in the minute offset calculation could be extracted to a named constant for better maintainability.
+ const ONE_MINUTE_OFFSET = 1; if (testEvent5) { const today = new Date(); testEvent5.endDate = today.toISOString().split("T")[0]; testEvent5.endTime = new Date( - today.setMinutes(today.getMinutes() + 1), + today.setMinutes(today.getMinutes() + ONE_MINUTE_OFFSET), ).toISOString(); await testEvent5.save(); }
669-682: Enhance test coverage for upcoming events.While the test verifies the correct events are returned, consider:
- Adding an assertion for the total number of events returned
- Adding comments explaining why these specific events (index 3 and 4) are expected
it("fetch upcoming events for the current date", async () => { const upcomingEvents = (await eventsByOrganizationConnectionResolver?.( {}, { currentDate: new Date(), where: { organization_id: testOrganization?._id, }, }, {}, )) as unknown as InterfaceEvent[]; + // Expect exactly 2 upcoming events + expect(upcomingEvents.length).toBe(2); + // Event 4 is scheduled for next week expect(upcomingEvents[0]?._id).toEqual(testEvents[3]?._id); + // Event 5 is scheduled for today with end time 1 minute from now expect(upcomingEvents[1]?._id).toEqual(testEvents[4]?._id); });tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (4)
74-74: Clarify the invalid input used incheckUserExiststest.In the invalid user ID test for
checkUserExists, you are passingtestUser?.appUserProfileIdas the argument. SinceappUserProfileIdis not a user ID, this test might not accurately represent an invalid user ID scenario. To make the test intent clearer, consider passing an explicitly invalid or non-existent user ID.Apply this change to clarify the test:
-await checkUserExists(testUser?.appUserProfileId); +await checkUserExists('invalidUserId');
114-114: Use an invalid volunteer ID that is clearly non-existent.In the test case for
checkEventVolunteerExistswith an invalid volunteer ID, you're passingtestUser?._id, which may or may not correspond to an existing volunteer. To ensure the test accurately checks the function's behavior with a truly invalid ID, consider using a random or clearly non-existent ID.Modify the test input as follows:
-await checkEventVolunteerExists(testUser?._id); +await checkEventVolunteerExists('invalidVolunteerId');
135-135: Ensure the invalid group ID used incheckVolunteerGroupExiststest is unambiguous.Similar to previous tests, using
testUser?._idas an invalid group ID may cause confusion if the user ID accidentally corresponds to a valid group ID. To make the test unambiguous, use a clearly invalid or random group ID.Update the test input:
-await checkVolunteerGroupExists(testUser?._id); +await checkVolunteerGroupExists('invalidGroupId');
156-156: Improve clarity by providing an unmistakably invalid membership ID.In the invalid membership ID test for
checkVolunteerMembershipExists, passingtestUser?._idmight not effectively test the function's error handling if the ID exists elsewhere. Use a definite invalid ID to clearly test the failure case.Change the input to a non-existent ID:
-await checkVolunteerMembershipExists(testUser?._id); +await checkVolunteerMembershipExists('invalidMembershipId');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- src/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (6 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (2 hunks)
- src/utilities/checks.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are properly organized, separating testing utilities, helpers, and the code under test.
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper type declarations.The imports are cleanly organized, with appropriate type imports and clear separation of models and utilities.
src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured type imports.The addition of specific interface types enhances type safety and provides better TypeScript support.
18-120: Verify integration with volunteer leaderboard feature.While the implementation supports filtering and sorting of volunteer groups, please verify if this aligns with the leaderboard requirements mentioned in the PR objectives.
tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts (2)
7-14: LGTM! Imports and type declarations are well organized.The new types and imports align well with the enhanced test scenarios and volunteer management features.
17-22: LGTM! Test variables are well defined.The test state variables are properly typed and provide comprehensive coverage for testing volunteer group scenarios.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
6-7: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper type declarations.The new imports for volunteer-related error constants, interfaces, and models are properly organized. The addition of utility check functions promotes code reuse.
Also applies to: 14-15, 21-22, 27-30
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (2)
1-31: LGTM! Well-structured test setup with proper typing.The imports and test variable declarations are well-organized and properly typed, including the new volunteer-related types and error constants.
1-241: Overall LGTM with suggestions for improvement.The test suite effectively covers the new volunteer-related functionality for action items, aligning well with the PR objectives. While the tests are functional, consider implementing the suggested improvements for better maintainability and robustness:
- Use enums for membership status
- Reduce setup code duplication
- Enhance test descriptions
- Add more comprehensive assertions
These changes would make the tests more maintainable and provide better documentation of the expected behavior.
tests/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.spec.ts (2)
43-48: LGTM! Improved null safety with optional chaining.The addition of optional chaining and default values enhances the robustness of the test setup.
Also applies to: 53-54
86-86: LGTM! Test events array properly updated.The array includes all test events, maintaining the correct order for subsequent tests.
src/constants.ts (1)
672-677: LGTM! The new error constant follows established patterns.The new
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant is well-structured, maintains consistency with other error constants, and provides clear error messaging for volunteer membership scenarios.tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (1)
1-181: Review completed: Test cases are comprehensive and well-structured.The test suite effectively covers both valid and invalid scenarios for the utility functions, ensuring robust validation and error handling. The use of mocks and spies is appropriate, and the setup and teardown processes are properly managed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (3)
8-9: Consider grouping related imports together.The error constants and volunteer-related type imports could be grouped with their related imports for better organization.
Consider reorganizing the imports like this:
- EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR, - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR, + } from "../../../src/constants"; + import type { + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR, + EVENT_VOLUNTEER_NOT_FOUND_ERROR, } from "../../../src/constants"; - import type { - TestVolunteerGroupType, - TestVolunteerType, - } from "../../helpers/volunteers"; - import { createTestVolunteerAndGroup } from "../../helpers/volunteers"; + import type { TestVolunteerGroupType, TestVolunteerType } from "../../helpers/volunteers"; + import { createTestVolunteerAndGroup } from "../../helpers/volunteers";Also applies to: 28-32
Line range hint
138-169: Remove duplicate test case.These two test cases are identical. They both test the same scenario where a volunteer group is not found. Consider removing one of them to maintain test suite clarity.
Remove one of the duplicate test blocks to avoid redundancy.
Also applies to: 172-204
Line range hint
1-697: Consider adding more edge case tests.While the test suite is comprehensive, consider adding these test cases:
- Test updating an action item with invalid assigneeType
- Test updating an action item with mismatched assigneeId and assigneeType
- Test concurrent updates to the same action item
Would you like me to provide example implementations for these test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (14 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
678-697: LGTM!The edge case test for missing appUserProfile is well-structured and properly validates the authorization error.
|
@tasneemkoushar PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 26
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (1)
17-31: Consider adding error handling in beforeAll.The test setup is well-structured, but consider adding try-catch blocks in beforeAll to handle potential setup failures gracefully.
beforeAll(async () => { + try { MONGOOSE_INSTANCE = await connect(); vi.spyOn(requestContext, "translate").mockImplementation( (message) => message, ); const [, , user1, user2, volunteer1] = await createVolunteerAndActions(); testUser1 = user1; testUser2 = user2; testEventVolunteer1 = volunteer1; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Test setup failed:', error); + throw error; + } });src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts (2)
Line range hint
14-33: Update JSDoc to reflect current implementation.The documentation should be updated to:
- Remove the
groupIdparameter description as it's no longer used- Add details about the
VolunteerMembershiprecord creation and its purpose* @param args - The arguments for the mutation, including: * - `data.userId`: The ID of the user to be assigned as a volunteer. * - `data.eventId`: The ID of the event for which the volunteer is being created. - * - `data.groupId`: The ID of the volunteer group to which the user is being added. * @param context - The context for the mutation, including: * - `userId`: The ID of the current user performing the operation. + * + * @remarks + * The function also creates a VolunteerMembership record with 'invited' status + * to track the volunteer's membership status for this event.
85-90: Consider extracting status as an enum or constant.The 'invited' status is hardcoded. Consider defining it as an enum or constant to maintain consistency and enable reuse.
+ // In a shared constants file + export const VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP_STATUS = { + INVITED: 'invited', + ACCEPTED: 'accepted', + REJECTED: 'rejected', + } as const; // In this file await VolunteerMembership.create({ volunteer: createdVolunteer._id, event: eventId, - status: "invited", + status: VOLUNTEER_MEMBERSHIP_STATUS.INVITED, createdBy: context.userId, });tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (2)
28-65: Consider enhancing test setup robustness.While the setup is comprehensive, consider adding:
- Error handling for the database connection
- Validation of created test entities
- Cleanup of test data in afterAll
Example enhancement:
beforeAll(async () => { MONGOOSE_INSTANCE = await connect(); const [, event, user1, , volunteer1, , volunteerGroup, ,] = await createVolunteerAndActions(); + + // Validate test entities + if (!event?._id || !user1?._id || !volunteer1._id || !volunteerGroup._id) { + throw new Error('Failed to create test entities'); + } testEvent = event; testUser1 = user1; // ... rest of the setup }); afterAll(async () => { + // Clean up test data + await VolunteerMembership.deleteMany({ + event: testEvent?._id + }); await disconnect(MONGOOSE_INSTANCE); });
1-143: Consider broader test organization for volunteer management.As part of the larger volunteer management feature, consider:
- Creating a shared test fixture for volunteer-related tests
- Adding integration tests that cover the interaction between volunteers, groups, and action items
- Documenting test data setup patterns for other developers
Would you like assistance in setting up a comprehensive test structure for the volunteer management feature?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 14-20: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (1)
38-47: Consider improving array destructuring readability.The empty slot in the array destructuring (line 42) makes the code less readable. Consider using a more explicit approach:
- const [ - organization, - event, - user1, - , - volunteer1, - , - volunteerGroup, - actionItem1, - ] = await createVolunteerAndActions(); + const { + organization, + event, + user1, + volunteer1, + volunteerGroup, + actionItem1, + } = await createVolunteerAndActions();This assumes modifying the helper function to return an object instead of an array.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
41-42: Consider enhancing documentation for transaction handling.While the documentation comprehensively covers the validation steps and parameters, it would be beneficial to add information about:
- The transaction handling for assignment updates
- The potential impact of assignment updates on volunteers and volunteer groups
Also applies to: 48-48, 52-52
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (3)
Line range hint
138-169: Remove duplicate test case.These two test blocks are identical. They test the same scenario for
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR. Remove one of them to maintain test suite clarity.Also applies to: 172-204
205-235: Improve test description for clarity.The test description "throws NotFoundError if no user exists when assigneeUser (doesn't exist)" could be more precise. Consider:
- it(`throws NotFoundError if no user exists when assigneeUser (doesn't exist)`, async () => { + it(`throws NotFoundError when updating action item with non-existent assignee user`, async () => {
Line range hint
547-624: Enhance test assertions for undefined scenarios.The assertions for undefined scenarios only check for
isCompleted: true. Consider adding more specific assertions to verify that other fields remain unchanged.expect(updatedActionItemPayload).toEqual( expect.objectContaining({ actionItemCategory: testCategory?._id, isCompleted: true, + assigneeType: "EventVolunteer", + assignee: expect.any(String), }), );schema.graphql (1)
761-764: Consider adding a length constraint for the description field.While the addition of
assignmentsanddescriptionfields enhances group management, consider adding a maximum length constraint to thedescriptionfield to prevent potential abuse or performance issues with extremely long descriptions.src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
Line range hint
843-875: EventVolunteerGroup type provides good organizational structure.The group type effectively supports:
- Leadership assignment
- Volunteer capacity planning
- Task assignments
- Description and naming
However, consider adding validation for the
volunteersRequiredfield.volunteersRequired?: InputMaybe<Scalars['PositiveInt']['input']>;
2537-2546: Query design enables flexible volunteer ranking system.The
getVolunteerRanksquery:
- Supports organization-level rankings
- Allows filtering and sorting
- Includes time frame constraints
Consider adding pagination support for large volunteer lists.
export type VolunteerRankWhereInput = { limit?: InputMaybe<Scalars['Int']['input']>; nameContains?: InputMaybe<Scalars['String']['input']>; orderBy: Scalars['String']['input']; timeFrame: Scalars['String']['input']; + offset?: InputMaybe<Scalars['Int']['input']>; };src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
268-268: Renamegroupsfield tovolunteerGroupsfor clarityIn the
EventVolunteertype, the fieldgroupsreferences[EventVolunteerGroup]. To improve clarity and avoid confusion with other group types (e.g., user groups), consider renaming this field tovolunteerGroups.- groups: [EventVolunteerGroup] + volunteerGroups: [EventVolunteerGroup]src/models/VolunteerMembership.ts (1)
29-36: Clarify the documentation for thegroupparameterIn the documentation comment for the
groupparameter, there is a repetitive phrase that could be improved for clarity.Apply this diff to correct the comment:
* @param group - Reference to the event volunteer group. Absence denotes a request for individual volunteer request. + * @param group - Reference to the event volunteer group. Absence denotes an individual volunteer request.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- schema.graphql (18 hunks)
- src/models/VolunteerMembership.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (6 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts (2 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteerGroup.ts (4 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createVolunteerMembership.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (3 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (42 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (14 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createVolunteerMembership.ts
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts:75-94 Timestamp: 2024-10-27T18:34:19.688Z Learning: In `src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts`, the assignee validation logic within the `createActionItem` function is intentionally kept inline and is not to be extracted into a helper function.
🪛 Biome
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts
[error] 14-20: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateEventVolunteer.spec.ts (3)
3-15: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The imports and test variable declarations are properly organized with clear type definitions.
34-45: LGTM! Well-implemented user validation test.The test properly validates the user mismatch scenario with appropriate error handling.
1-84: Verify test coverage aligns with PR objectives.While the tests cover the basic volunteer management functionality, consider adding specific tests for:
- Integration with action items
- Volunteer group membership validation
- Search and sort functionality mentioned in the PR objectives
This will ensure complete coverage of all features mentioned in issue #2585.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import changes align with new volunteer management features.The addition of
VolunteerMembershipmodel and utility functions supports the new volunteer management functionality.Also applies to: 10-11
59-68: LGTM! Robust authorization checks.The implementation properly validates both event-level and organization-level admin permissions using the new
adminCheckutility.src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteerGroup.ts (3)
6-14: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured and include all necessary models and utilities for the enhanced volunteer group functionality.
Line range hint
16-44: Excellent documentation coverage!The JSDoc comments are comprehensive and accurately reflect the enhanced functionality, including all new parameters and steps in the process.
Line range hint
57-85: LGTM! Robust authorization checks.The implementation properly validates both event existence and user authorization, checking for both event and organization admin privileges.
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1)
1-14: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are logically structured and include all necessary dependencies for testing.
tests/utilities/checks.spec.ts (1)
1-36: LGTM! Well-organized imports and type declarations.The imports are logically grouped and all necessary types and constants are properly imported.
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
1-20: LGTM! Well-organized imports with clear separation of concerns.The imports are properly structured and include all necessary dependencies for the functionality.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts (2)
62-98: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling tests for volunteer scenarios.The tests properly validate error cases for both EventVolunteer and EventVolunteerGroup not found scenarios.
62-217: Verify edge cases in test coverage.While the test suite is comprehensive, consider adding these edge cases:
- Creating an action item with invalid assigneeType
- Creating an action item with non-existent actionItemCategoryId
- Creating an action item when user doesn't have permission
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage is comprehensive and well-structured
After reviewing the implementation and test file, I can confirm that the test coverage is complete and addresses all key scenarios:
- Invalid assigneeType is implicitly covered as the implementation only accepts "EventVolunteer", "EventVolunteerGroup", and "User" through TypeScript types and validation logic
- Non-existent actionItemCategoryId is covered by the "ActionItemCategory Not Found" test
- Permission checks are implemented in the code (lines 166-178) with proper error handling for unauthorized users
Additional observations:
- Error cases cover all possible validation failures
- Success cases verify all three valid assigneeTypes
- Implementation includes proper transaction handling and data consistency checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if these test cases exist in other test files rg -l 'assigneeType.*invalid' tests/ rg -l 'actionItemCategoryId.*non-existent' tests/ rg -l 'permission.*denied.*createActionItem' tests/Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation to understand what validations exist ast-grep --pattern 'createActionItem = async ($$$) => { $$$ }' # Also check for any validation related code rg -B2 -A2 "assigneeType.*=.*" tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.tsLength of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different pattern to find the implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export const createActionItem' # Check the test file content to understand the setup and validations cat tests/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.spec.ts # Look for any validation types or enums related to assigneeType rg -A2 "type.*AssigneeType|enum.*AssigneeType"Length of output: 19681
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (2)
6-7: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured.The new imports are properly organized and align well with the added volunteer management functionality.
Also applies to: 14-15, 21-22, 27-30
63-64: LGTM: Improved user validation.The use of utility functions
checkUserExistsandcheckAppUserProfileExistsimproves code maintainability and ensures consistent validation across the codebase.tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (1)
8-9: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The additions properly integrate volunteer-related functionality into the test suite with appropriate error constants, types, and test data initialization.
Also applies to: 29-31, 40-41, 68-68
schema.graphql (3)
9-12: Well-designed flexible assignment system for action items.The changes to the
ActionItemtype introduce a flexible assignment system that supports assigning tasks to volunteers, groups, or users. TheassigneeTypefield helps distinguish between different assignee types, making it easier to handle assignments programmatically.
680-681: Good relationship design between events and volunteers.The addition of
volunteerGroupsandvolunteersfields to theEventtype establishes clear relationships for managing volunteer participation and group organization within events.
746-754: Enhanced volunteer management with comprehensive tracking.The changes to
EventVolunteertype provide robust volunteer management features including multiple group membership, hours tracking, and visibility control.Please verify that the
hoursVolunteeredfield remains consistent with the sum of hours inhoursHistory.✅ Verification successful
Validation exists through action item updates
Based on the codebase analysis, the
hoursVolunteeredfield is automatically maintained in sync withhoursHistorythrough the action item update process:
- When action items are updated, both
hoursVolunteeredandhoursHistoryare modified atomically in the same transaction- Hours are added/subtracted from
hoursVolunteeredwhile corresponding entries are pushed tohoursHistory- The system maintains consistency by:
- Adding hours when assigning action items
- Subtracting hours when unassigning
- Updating both fields when redistributing hours
The original review comment's concern about validation is addressed by the implementation, as the synchronization is handled automatically by the mutation resolvers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there are any validation rules for hoursVolunteered in the codebase # Test: Search for validation logic. Expect: Code that validates hoursVolunteered against hoursHistory. rg -A 5 "hoursVolunteered.*hoursHistory"Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different search patterns to find validation logic # Search for hoursVolunteered calculations or updates rg -A 5 "hoursVolunteered" # Search for hoursHistory related logic rg -A 5 "hoursHistory" # Search for any GraphQL resolvers related to EventVolunteer ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements EventVolunteerResolvers { $$$ }'Length of output: 20161
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
3177-3222: Core volunteer management types look well-structured.The new types
VolunteerMembership,VolunteerRank, andHoursHistoryprovide a solid foundation for volunteer management:
VolunteerMembershiptracks the relationship between volunteers and groupsVolunteerRankenables leaderboard functionalityHoursHistoryallows tracking volunteer hours over time
75-78: Action Item assignee changes improve flexibility.The changes to
ActionItemtype enhance assignment capabilities:
- Can now be assigned to volunteers or groups
- Includes assignee type tracking
- Maintains backward compatibility with user assignments
827-835: EventVolunteer type enhancements support tracking and visibility.Good additions to track volunteer engagement:
- Hours tracking with history
- Acceptance status
- Public visibility flag
- Group associations
1529-1531: Volunteer membership mutations follow good practices.The mutations for managing volunteer memberships:
- Take appropriate input types
- Return full objects
- Support status updates
Also applies to: 1923-1926
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
278-281:HoursHistorytype addition is well-definedThe
HoursHistorytype effectively captures the record of hours volunteered over time.src/models/VolunteerMembership.ts (2)
83-94: Avoid multiple model compilationThe function
volunteerMembershipModelis designed to prevent recompilation issues during testing. Ensure that models are not being compiled multiple times, which can lead toOverwriteModelError.
74-75: Confirm the logging middleware is operationalThe
createLoggingMiddlewarefunction is applied to the schema to enable logging. Ensure that this middleware is correctly configured and that logs are being recorded as expected whenever changes occur in theVolunteerMembershipcollection.Run the following script to check if the middleware is correctly set up:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the logging middleware implementation.
Let me check the implementation of the logging middleware in the dbLogger file since it's the source of the functionality.
Logging middleware is properly implemented and operational
The
createLoggingMiddlewareimplementation indbLogger.tsis robust and correctly sets up logging for all necessary database operations:
- Pre/post hooks for 'save' operations (create)
- Pre/post hooks for update operations (findOneAndUpdate, updateOne, updateMany)
- Pre/post hooks for delete operations (deleteOne, deleteMany)
The middleware will automatically log transactions when:
- Environment variable
LOGis set to true- A valid
LOG_PATHis configuredThe test suite confirms the middleware's functionality across all operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the logging middleware is attached to the VolunteerMembership schema. # Test: Search for middleware hooks attached to the schema. Expect: The 'save' and 'update' hooks should be present. ast-grep --pattern $'volunteerMembershipSchema.$_("$pre", $_)' --json # Note: Replace "$pre" with the appropriate middleware hook name if different.Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of createLoggingMiddleware ast-grep --pattern 'function createLoggingMiddleware' # Search for any middleware registration patterns ast-grep --pattern 'schema.$_("pre", $_)' ast-grep --pattern 'schema.$_("post", $_)' # Look for the actual file content to understand the context better rg -l "createLoggingMiddleware"Length of output: 1126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation in dbLogger.ts cat src/libraries/dbLogger.ts # Also check the test file to understand the expected behavior cat tests/libraries/dbLogger.spec.tsLength of output: 8269
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (2)
41-42: Enhance function documentation for new parameters.The JSDoc needs updates to fully document:
- The possible values for
assigneeType- The structure of the returned action item object
- The validation rules for each assignee type
Add these details to the
@paramand@returnssections:* - `assigneeId`: The ID of the user to whom the action item is assigned. -* - `assigneeType`: The type of the assignee (EventVolunteer or EventVolunteerGroup). +* - `assigneeType`: The type of the assignee. Can be one of: +* - "EventVolunteer": For individual volunteer assignments +* - "EventVolunteerGroup": For group assignments +* - "User": For regular user assignments * - `actionItemCategoryId`: The ID of the action item category. +* - `allotedHours`: The number of hours allotted for the action item. * @returns A promise that resolves to the created action item object with: +* - Populated assignee details based on assigneeType +* - Updated assignment references in volunteer/group recordsAlso applies to: 48-48, 52-52
75-94: Improve type safety in assignee validation.While the validation logic is correct, we can enhance type safety:
-let assignee: InterfaceEventVolunteer | InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup | null; +type Assignee = { + EventVolunteer: InterfaceEventVolunteer; + EventVolunteerGroup: InterfaceEventVolunteerGroup; +}; +let assignee: Assignee[keyof Assignee] | null; if (assigneeType === "EventVolunteer") { assignee = await EventVolunteer.findById(assigneeId) .populate("user") .lean(); + // TypeScript now knows assignee is InterfaceEventVolunteer | nullsrc/typeDefs/types.ts (6)
259-260: Add documentation for volunteer-related fieldsConsider adding descriptions for the new fields to improve API documentation:
- volunteers: [EventVolunteer] - volunteerGroups: [EventVolunteerGroup] + """ + List of volunteers associated with this event + """ + volunteers: [EventVolunteer] + """ + List of volunteer groups organized for this event + """ + volunteerGroups: [EventVolunteerGroup]
265-274: Consider reordering fields for better readabilityThe fields could be grouped more logically:
type EventVolunteer { _id: ID! user: User! creator: User event: Event groups: [EventVolunteerGroup] - hasAccepted: Boolean! - isPublic: Boolean! - hoursVolunteered: Float! - assignments: [ActionItem] - hoursHistory: [HoursHistory] - createdAt: DateTime! - updatedAt: DateTime! + # Status fields + hasAccepted: Boolean! + isPublic: Boolean! + # Volunteer work tracking + hoursVolunteered: Float! + hoursHistory: [HoursHistory] + # Assignments + assignments: [ActionItem] + # Metadata + createdAt: DateTime! + updatedAt: DateTime!
278-281: Add documentation for HoursHistory typeConsider adding descriptions to improve API documentation:
+ """ + Represents a historical record of volunteer hours + """ type HoursHistory { + """ + Number of hours volunteered in this record + """ hours: Float! + """ + Date when these hours were logged + """ date: Date! }
283-287: Add documentation and consider validation for VolunteerRankConsider adding descriptions and ensuring rank is positive:
+ """ + Represents a volunteer's ranking based on their contributed hours + """ type VolunteerRank { - rank: Int! + """ + Position in the leaderboard (must be positive) + """ + rank: PositiveInt! user: User! hoursVolunteered: Float! }
309-309: Add documentation for new fields in EventVolunteerGroupConsider adding descriptions for the new fields:
type EventVolunteerGroup { _id: ID! creator: User event: Event leader: User! name: String - description: String + """ + Detailed description of the volunteer group's purpose and responsibilities + """ + description: String createdAt: DateTime! updatedAt: DateTime! volunteers: [EventVolunteer] volunteersRequired: Int - assignments: [ActionItem] + """ + Tasks assigned to this volunteer group + """ + assignments: [ActionItem] }Also applies to: 314-314
317-326: Consider reordering fields for better readabilityThe fields could be grouped more logically:
type VolunteerMembership { _id: ID! - status: String! - volunteer: EventVolunteer! - event: Event! - group: EventVolunteerGroup - createdBy: User - updatedBy: User - createdAt: DateTime! - updatedAt: DateTime! + # Core relationships + volunteer: EventVolunteer! + event: Event! + group: EventVolunteerGroup + # Status + status: String! + # Metadata + createdBy: User + updatedBy: User + createdAt: DateTime! + updatedAt: DateTime! }src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1)
2307-2308: Consider adding documentation for volunteer management operationsWhile the new queries and mutations are well-structured, consider adding documentation comments to describe:
- Expected behavior and status transitions for volunteer memberships
- Ranking calculation methodology
- Assignment type validation rules
Example documentation format:
/** * Creates a new volunteer membership request/invitation * @param data The membership details including event, group and user * @returns The created VolunteerMembership entity */ createVolunteerMembership?: Resolver<...>;Also applies to: 1229-1229, 1934-1937
schema.graphql (1)
983-986: Consider usingDateTimefordateinHoursHistoryIf time is relevant in
HoursHistory, consider changingdate: Date!todate: DateTime!for more precision.Apply this diff:
type HoursHistory { - date: Date! + date: DateTime! hours: Float! }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- schema.graphql (18 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (6 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (4 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (5 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (3 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (42 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts:75-94 Timestamp: 2024-10-27T18:34:19.688Z Learning: In `src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts`, the assignee validation logic within the `createActionItem` function is intentionally kept inline and is not to be extracted into a helper function.
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
108-135:⚠️ Potential issueAdd status transition validation to prevent invalid state changes.
The current implementation allows any status transition without validation. This could lead to invalid state changes (e.g., from "rejected" to "accepted").
Add status transition validation:
+const VALID_TRANSITIONS = { + invited: ['accepted', 'rejected'], + requested: ['accepted', 'rejected'], + accepted: [], // terminal state + rejected: [], // terminal state +} as const; + +function isValidTransition(from: string, to: string): boolean { + return VALID_TRANSITIONS[from as keyof typeof VALID_TRANSITIONS]?.includes(to); +} export const updateVolunteerMembership: MutationResolvers["updateVolunteerMembership"] = async (_parent, args, context) => { // ... existing checks ... + // Validate status transition + if (!isValidTransition(volunteerMembership.status, args.status)) { + throw new errors.ValidationError( + `Invalid status transition from ${volunteerMembership.status} to ${args.status}`, + 'INVALID_STATUS_TRANSITION' + ); + } const updatedVolunteerMembership = (await VolunteerMembership.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: args.id, }, { $set: { status: args.status as | "invited" | "requested" | "accepted" | "rejected", updatedBy: context.userId, + updatedAt: new Date(), }, }, { new: true, runValidators: true, }, ).lean()) as InterfaceVolunteerMembership;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
6-7: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured.The new imports are properly organized and grouped by their purposes (constants, interfaces, models, and utilities).
Also applies to: 14-15, 21-22, 27-30
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (1)
138-140: LGTM! The mutation definition follows GraphQL best practices.The
createVolunteerMembershipmutation is well-defined with proper authentication and clear input/output types.src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
74-77: Skip comment: Issue already addressedA comprehensive review comment already exists discussing the multiple assignee fields and suggesting a union type approach.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
3201-3212: Well-structured volunteer management types!The new core types (VolunteerMembership, VolunteerRank, HoursHistory) provide a solid foundation for volunteer management with:
- Clear relationships between volunteers, groups and events
- Proper tracking of volunteer hours and rankings
- Good timestamp and audit fields
Also applies to: 3234-3239, 1065-1069
3789-3792: Verify ActionItem assignee resolution logicThe ActionItem type now supports multiple assignee types (volunteer, group, user). Please verify:
- Proper handling of assignee resolution based on assigneeType
- Null checks for optional assignee fields
- Consistent behavior when assignees are deleted
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
ActionItem assignee resolution is properly implemented
The codebase shows robust handling of multiple assignee types:
- Proper null checks and type validation in both create/update mutations
- Consistent assignee field updates based on assigneeType ("EventVolunteer", "EventVolunteerGroup", "User")
- Correct handling of assignee references when assignments change
- Hours tracking logic for volunteers and volunteer groups
- Proper cleanup of old assignee references when updating assignments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ActionItem resolver implementations to verify assignee handling ast-grep --pattern $'class ActionItemResolver { $$$ assignee($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for ActionItem resolvers using ripgrep rg -l "ActionItem.*Resolver" --type ts # Then search for assignee-related resolver implementations rg "assignee.*Resolver" --type ts -A 5 # Also search for any ActionItem-related resolver implementations rg "class.*ActionItem.*{" --type ts -A 10Length of output: 1847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual resolver implementations in the mutation files cat src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts cat src/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.ts # Also search for any ActionItem type definitions rg "type ActionItem" --type ts -A 5 # And check for any assignee-related validation or business logic rg "assignee.*Type" --type ts -A 5Length of output: 62673
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (4)
157-157: Change to makegroupIdoptional looks goodMaking
groupIdoptional inEventVolunteerInputallows for adding volunteers who are not associated with a specific group. This enhances flexibility in managing event volunteers.
169-169: RequiringnameinEventVolunteerGroupInputis appropriateMaking
name: String!ensures that each volunteer group has a mandatory name, which is essential for identification and management purposes.
194-197: Additions toUpdateEventVolunteerInputenhance functionalityThe new fields in
UpdateEventVolunteerInputimprove the ability to update volunteer assignments and acceptance status, enhancing flexibility in the volunteer management process.
191-191:⚠️ Potential issueClarify the purpose of the
filterfieldThe
filterfield inVolunteerMembershipWhereInputis ambiguous. Please provide more context or consider renaming it to better reflect its intended use.Could you explain the intended use of
filter? If it's meant for general search, consider using more descriptive fields or combining specific filters.schema.graphql (8)
47-47: LGTMThe addition of
orgIdtoActionItemWhereInputenhances filtering capabilities within an organization.
685-686: LGTMAdding
volunteerGroupsandvolunteersto theEventtype enhances volunteer management and association with events.
766-769: LGTMAdding
assignmentsanddescriptiontoEventVolunteerGroupprovides more context and functionality for volunteer groups.
779-783: LGTMThe updated
EventVolunteerGroupInputenhances the ability to create detailed volunteer groups with leaders and descriptions.
813-819: LGTMThe
EventVolunteerWhereInputprovides comprehensive filtering options for querying event volunteers.
821-824: LGTMAdding
EventVolunteersOrderByInputallows sorting volunteers byhoursVolunteered, which is useful for leaderboards.
1143-1143: LGTMThe
createVolunteerMembershipmutation facilitates managing volunteer memberships effectively.
1207-1207: LGTMUpdating
EventVolunteerGroupthroughupdateEventVolunteerGroupmutation enhances group management capabilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-22: Update documentation to reflect new functionalityThe JSDoc comments should be updated to include information about:
- The new
upcomingOnlyfilter- The volunteer-related data that's being populated
- The timezone considerations for date filtering
Add these details to the existing documentation:
/** * Retrieves events for a specific organization based on the provided query parameters. * * This function performs the following steps: * 1. Generates recurring event instances up to a certain date if the organization has any. * 2. Builds a query filter (`where`) and sorting parameters based on the provided arguments. * 3. Queries the database for events matching the filter, with sorting, pagination, and related data fetching. * 4. When upcomingOnly is true, filters events based on their end date and time. * 5. Populates volunteer-related data including volunteer groups and individual volunteers. * * @param _parent - This parameter is not used in this resolver function. * @param args - The arguments provided by the GraphQL query: * - where: Query filters including organization_id and upcomingOnly flag * - orderBy: Sorting options * - first: Pagination limit * - skip: Pagination offset * * @returns A list of events matching the query parameters, with related volunteer data populated. */src/typeDefs/queries.ts (1)
63-63: Consider adding field description.The new
upcomingOnlyparameter is well-placed and maintains backward compatibility. Consider adding a description comment to document its behavior.eventsByOrganizationConnection( where: EventWhereInput + """ + When true, returns only upcoming events. Defaults to false. + """ upcomingOnly: Boolean first: Int skip: Int orderBy: EventOrderByInput ): [Event!]!tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts (1)
73-170: Add tests for edge cases and performance scenarios.Consider adding the following test cases:
Edge cases:
- Empty arrays
- Maximum array sizes
- Special characters in search terms
Error scenarios:
- Database connection errors
- Validation errors
- Permission errors
Performance scenarios:
- Large result sets
- Complex filter combinations
Would you like me to provide example implementations for these test cases?
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
179-181: Maintain consistent field naming patterns.The field
leaderNameshould follow the same pattern asname_containsfor string search fields.Apply this diff:
input EventVolunteerGroupWhereInput { eventId: ID userId: ID orgId: ID - leaderName: String + leaderName_contains: String name_contains: String }src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1)
2560-2563: Add documentation for getVolunteerMembership queryThe query definition looks good but would benefit from documentation describing the available filters and sort options.
Consider adding JSDoc comments:
/** * Query to fetch volunteer memberships with filtering and sorting * @param where - Filter conditions including eventId, userId, status etc. * @param orderBy - Sort options for the results */ getVolunteerMembership?: Resolver<...>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
schema.graphql(18 hunks)src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts(4 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.ts(3 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts(2 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.ts(1 hunks)src/typeDefs/enums.ts(1 hunks)src/typeDefs/inputs.ts(5 hunks)src/typeDefs/mutations.ts(2 hunks)src/typeDefs/queries.ts(2 hunks)src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts(42 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.spec.ts(2 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts
- src/typeDefs/enums.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (2)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/typeDefs/inputs.ts:201-201
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:43:31.707Z
Learning: In the GraphQL schema for `src/typeDefs/inputs.ts`, the `eventId` field in `UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput` is required (`ID!`) and should remain as it is necessary even when updating an event volunteer group.
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/typeDefs/inputs.ts:80-80
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:39:50.333Z
Learning: In `src/typeDefs/inputs.ts`, the `orgId` field in `ActionItemWhereInput` is intentionally optional (`ID`) and should not be changed to non-nullable (`ID!`).
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/typeDefs/inputs.ts:201-201
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:43:31.707Z
Learning: In the GraphQL schema for `src/typeDefs/inputs.ts`, the `eventId` field in `UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput` is required (`ID!`) and should remain as it is necessary even when updating an event volunteer group.
🪛 Biome
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerMembership.spec.ts
[error] 14-20: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/resolvers/Query/eventsByOrganizationConnection.ts (1)
30-42:
Consider timezone handling in date comparisons
The current implementation might have timezone-related edge cases:
currentDateis created using local timezone- Mixing string-based date comparison (
endDate) with Date object comparison (endTime) could lead to inconsistencies
Consider this improved implementation:
- const currentDate = new Date();
+ // Use UTC for consistent date handling
+ const currentDate = new Date();
+ const currentDateUTC = new Date(Date.UTC(
+ currentDate.getUTCFullYear(),
+ currentDate.getUTCMonth(),
+ currentDate.getUTCDate(),
+ currentDate.getUTCHours(),
+ currentDate.getUTCMinutes(),
+ currentDate.getUTCSeconds()
+ ));
where = {
...where,
isBaseRecurringEvent: false,
...(args.upcomingOnly && {
$or: [
- { endDate: { $gt: currentDate } },
- {
- endDate: { $eq: currentDate.toISOString().split("T")[0] },
- endTime: { $gt: currentDate },
- },
+ { endDate: { $gt: currentDateUTC.toISOString().split("T")[0] } },
+ {
+ endDate: { $eq: currentDateUTC.toISOString().split("T")[0] },
+ endTime: { $gt: currentDateUTC },
+ },
],
}),
};src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports are properly organized with clear type declarations, enhancing type safety.
src/typeDefs/queries.ts (1)
19-24: LGTM: Well-structured action items query.
The new actionItemsByUser query follows GraphQL best practices and maintains consistency with existing action item queries while supporting the volunteer management integration objective.
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2)
142-144: LGTM! Well-structured mutation definition.
The mutation is well-defined with proper input validation and authentication.
316-318:
Verify enum implementation for status field.
While you indicated the enum suggestion was implemented, the mutation still shows status: String!. Please ensure the VolunteerMembershipStatus enum is properly defined and used here.
Update the mutation to use the enum:
-updateVolunteerMembership(id: ID!, status: String!): VolunteerMembership! @auth
+updateVolunteerMembership(id: ID!, status: VolunteerMembershipStatus!): VolunteerMembership! @authsrc/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
157-165: LGTM! Well-structured input types for event volunteer management.
The changes follow consistent naming patterns and provide appropriate flexibility with optional fields.
schema.graphql (5)
751-759: Well-structured volunteer tracking system!
The EventVolunteer type effectively manages volunteer assignments, hours tracking, and privacy settings. The structure allows for:
- Historical tracking of volunteered hours
- Assignment management
- Privacy control
- Group membership management
Line range hint 766-792: Well-designed group management structure!
The EventVolunteerGroup type and its related enums provide a comprehensive solution for managing volunteer groups with:
- Group assignments tracking
- Descriptive information
- Flexible sorting options for both assignments and volunteers
Line range hint 1542-1554: Comprehensive query structure for volunteer management!
The queries effectively support the volunteer leaderboard feature and group management with:
- Flexible filtering options
- Sorting capabilities
- Clear separation of concerns between groups and individual volunteers
2109-2120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for timeFrame field.
The timeFrame field in VolunteerRankWhereInput is currently a String. Consider creating an enum to restrict it to valid values for better type safety.
Apply this diff:
+enum VolunteerTimeFrame {
+ DAILY
+ WEEKLY
+ MONTHLY
+ YEARLY
+}
input VolunteerRankWhereInput {
limit: Int
nameContains: String
orderBy: String!
- timeFrame: String!
+ timeFrame: VolunteerTimeFrame!
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a union type for assignee field.
The current structure with multiple assignee fields (assignee, assigneeGroup, assigneeUser) could lead to data inconsistency. Consider using a union type to ensure only one type of assignee can be set at a time.
Apply this diff:
+union ActionItemAssignee = User | EventVolunteer | EventVolunteerGroup
type ActionItem {
_id: ID!
actionItemCategory: ActionItemCategory
allotedHours: Float
- assignee: EventVolunteer
- assigneeGroup: EventVolunteerGroup
- assigneeType: String!
- assigneeUser: User
+ assignee: ActionItemAssignee!
assigner: User
# ... other fields
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
3218-3229: LGTM: Well-structured VolunteerMembership type definition
The VolunteerMembership type has a good set of core fields including audit fields (createdAt, updatedBy etc.) and proper relationships to Event, EventVolunteer and EventVolunteerGroup.
832-840: LGTM: Enhanced EventVolunteer type with volunteer tracking
Good addition of fields for tracking volunteer hours, assignments and status. The hoursHistory array provides good granularity for time tracking.
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
110-129: Add audit trail for status changes.Important status changes should be logged for accountability and debugging purposes.
).lean()) as InterfaceVolunteerMembership; + // Log status change for audit trail + await AuditLog.create({ + entityId: args.id, + entityType: 'VolunteerMembership', + action: 'UPDATE_STATUS', + actorId: context.userId, + oldValue: volunteerMembership.status, + newValue: args.status, + metadata: { + event: volunteerMembership.event, + volunteer: volunteerMembership.volunteer, + group: volunteerMembership.group + } + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts:77-90
Timestamp: 2024-10-27T19:07:55.891Z
Learning: In the `createEventVolunteer` mutation in `src/resolvers/Mutation/createEventVolunteer.ts`, wrapping the creation of `EventVolunteer` and `VolunteerMembership` records in a transaction is not necessary.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateVolunteerMembership.ts (3)
1-20: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured and include all necessary types, models, utilities, and error handling components.
24-60:
Add error recovery mechanism for parallel updates.
While the parallel updates using Promise.all are efficient, a failure in any update could leave the system in an inconsistent state. Consider adding a rollback mechanism.
Note: Previous review comments about adding transaction support and input validation are still valid and should be addressed.
81-108: Clarify authorization bypass for "invited" status.
The authorization check is skipped when status is "invited". This could potentially allow unauthorized users to modify invited memberships. Please document the reasoning or implement proper authorization checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByOrganization.spec.ts (1)
29-43: Add comments to clarify test data setup.While the test data setup is comprehensive, it would be helpful to add comments explaining why we're creating an additional action item with
assigneeType: "User". This appears to be testing backward compatibility with the old user assignment model alongside the new volunteer system.await ActionItem.create({ + // Create an action item with legacy User assignee type to ensure backward compatibility creator: testUser1?._id, assigner: testUser1?._id, assigneeUser: testUser1?._id, assigneeType: "User",src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (2)
22-41: Consider implementing DataLoader for nested populations.The current implementation with multiple nested populate calls could lead to N+1 query performance issues at scale. Consider implementing DataLoader to batch and cache the database queries.
Example implementation:
import DataLoader from 'dataloader'; const userLoader = new DataLoader(async (userIds) => { const users = await User.find({ _id: { $in: userIds } }); return userIds.map(id => users.find(user => user.id === id)); });
118-122: Improve type safety for orderBy parameter.The type assertion could be replaced with a more type-safe approach using a union type.
+type SortOrder = 'volunteers_ASC' | 'volunteers_DESC' | 'assignments_ASC' | 'assignments_DESC'; + -if (args.orderBy && args.orderBy in sortConfigs) { +if (args.orderBy && isValidSortOrder(args.orderBy)) { filteredEventVolunteerGroups.sort( - sortConfigs[args.orderBy as keyof typeof sortConfigs], + sortConfigs[args.orderBy], ); } + +function isValidSortOrder(value: string): value is SortOrder { + return value in sortConfigs; +}src/models/ActionItem.ts (1)
41-43: Enhance field documentation for clarity.Consider adding more context to the documentation about:
- The relationship between
assignee,assigneeGroup, andassigneeUser- When each assignee type should be used
- Constraints or business rules for assignment
Example enhancement:
- * @param assignee - User to whom the ActionItem is assigned. - * @param assigneeGroup - Group to whom the ActionItem is assigned. - * @param assigneeUser - Organization User to whom the ActionItem is assigned. + * @param assignee - EventVolunteer to whom the ActionItem is assigned when assigneeType is "EventVolunteer". + * @param assigneeGroup - VolunteerGroup to whom the ActionItem is assigned when assigneeType is "EventVolunteerGroup". + * @param assigneeUser - Organization User to whom the ActionItem is assigned when assigneeType is "User".src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
41-52: Add missing parameter documentation.The function documentation is missing details for the
allottedHoursparameter in the@param argssection.Add the following to the parameter documentation:
* - `dueDate`: The due date for the action item. * - `eventId` (optional): The ID of the event associated with the action item. +* - `allottedHours`: The number of hours allotted for the action item. * - `actionItemCategoryId`: The ID of the action item category.src/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.ts (1)
Line range hint
177-190: Improve documentation for authorization exception.The comment about the authorization exception could be more explicit about why completion status updates are allowed without admin privileges.
- // Checks if the user is authorized for the operation. (Exception: when user updates the action item to complete or incomplete) + // Authorization check for action item updates: + // - Admin privileges (org admin, event admin, or super admin) are required for all updates + // - Exception: Assignees can update the completion status of their own action items without admin privilegestests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
138-204: Duplicate test case detected.The test case for
EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERRORis duplicated. The second test case (lines 172-204) is identical to the first one (lines 138-171).Remove the duplicate test case:
- it(`throws NotFoundError if no user exists with _id === args.data.assigneeId`, async () => { - try { - const testActionItem2 = await ActionItem.create({ - title: `title${nanoid().toLowerCase()}`, - description: `description${nanoid().toLowerCase()}`, - creator: testUser?._id, - assigneeType: "EventVolunteerGroup", - assigneeGroup: new Types.ObjectId().toString(), - organization: testOrganization?._id, - assigner: testUser?._id, - actionItemCategory: testCategory?._id, - event: testEvent?._id, - }); - - const args: MutationUpdateActionItemArgs = { - id: testActionItem2?._id.toString() ?? "", - data: { - assigneeId: new Types.ObjectId().toString(), - assigneeType: "EventVolunteerGroup", - }, - }; - - const context = { - userId: testUser?._id, - }; - - await updateActionItemResolver?.({}, args, context); - } catch (error: unknown) { - expect((error as Error).message).toEqual( - EVENT_VOLUNTEER_GROUP_NOT_FOUND_ERROR.MESSAGE, - ); - } - });
Line range hint
547-624: Improve test descriptions for undefined completion status.The test descriptions for undefined completion status scenarios could be more descriptive about the expected behavior.
Rename the test descriptions to better reflect the test scenarios:
- it(`updates the actionItem isCompleted is undefined (EventVolunteer)`, async () => { + it(`maintains existing completion status when isCompleted is undefined for EventVolunteer`, async () => {Apply similar changes to the other undefined completion status test cases.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1)
Line range hint
845-862: Consider adding validation for volunteersRequired fieldThe EventVolunteerGroup type includes a volunteersRequired field but could benefit from validation to ensure it's a positive number.
Consider using the PositiveInt scalar type that's already defined:
- volunteersRequired?: Maybe<Scalars['Int']['output']>; + volunteersRequired?: Maybe<Scalars['PositiveInt']['output']>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
codegen.ts(1 hunks)schema.graphql(18 hunks)src/models/ActionItem.ts(6 hunks)src/models/index.ts(1 hunks)src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts(6 hunks)src/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.ts(5 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts(2 hunks)src/resolvers/index.ts(0 hunks)src/typeDefs/inputs.ts(5 hunks)src/typeDefs/queries.ts(2 hunks)src/typeDefs/types.ts(3 hunks)src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts(42 hunks)tests/helpers/volunteers.ts(1 hunks)tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts(14 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByOrganization.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByUser.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/resolvers/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- codegen.ts
- src/models/index.ts
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts
- tests/helpers/volunteers.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByUser.spec.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (2)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts:197-212
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:00:29.848Z
Learning: In the `EventVolunteer` model, the `groups` attribute is an array of object IDs. Updating based on the `groups` array may increase time complexity and performance overhead.
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts:75-94
Timestamp: 2024-10-27T18:34:19.688Z
Learning: In `src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts`, the assignee validation logic within the `createActionItem` function is intentionally kept inline and is not to be extracted into a helper function.
src/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts:197-212
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:00:29.848Z
Learning: In the `EventVolunteer` model, the `groups` attribute is an array of object IDs. Updating based on the `groups` array may increase time complexity and performance overhead.
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/typeDefs/types.ts:269-270
Timestamp: 2024-10-27T19:17:47.166Z
Learning: In `src/typeDefs/types.ts`, within the `EventVolunteer` type, the fields `isPublic` and `hasAccepted` are considered to have self-explanatory names and do not require additional documentation or renaming.
🔇 Additional comments (21)
tests/resolvers/Query/actionItemsByOrganization.spec.ts (1)
1-11: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly organized and include all necessary types and helpers for testing the action items functionality.
src/resolvers/Query/getEventVolunteerGroups.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Clean import structure.
The imports are well-organized with clear separation between interfaces and models.
src/models/ActionItem.ts (2)
8-9: LGTM: Import statements are properly structured.
The new imports for volunteer-related interfaces align with the PR's objective of integrating volunteer management features.
16-19: Verify the necessity of both assignee and assigneeUser fields.
The model now has both assignee (EventVolunteer) and assigneeUser (User) fields, which seems redundant. Consider if one of these could be removed to maintain a cleaner data structure.
Let's verify the usage of these fields:
src/typeDefs/queries.ts (5)
19-24: LGTM: Well-structured query definition.
The new actionItemsByUser query follows consistent patterns with optional filtering and sorting capabilities.
63-63: LGTM: Non-breaking enhancement.
The optional upcomingOnly parameter is a good addition that enhances filtering capabilities without breaking existing queries.
69-77: LGTM: Well-structured volunteer management queries.
Both queries follow consistent patterns with proper return types and sorting capabilities.
79-82: LGTM: Consistent membership query implementation.
The query follows established patterns and best practices with proper parameter types and non-nullable return type.
84-88: LGTM: Well-defined volunteer ranks query.
The query properly requires organization context and filtering parameters, maintaining consistency with other volunteer-related queries.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createActionItem.ts (1)
6-7: LGTM: Well-organized imports and type definitions.
The new imports are properly organized and support the volunteer management feature with clear error constants, interfaces, and models.
Also applies to: 14-15, 21-22, 27-30
src/typeDefs/types.ts (5)
259-260: LGTM! Event type properly extended with volunteer management fields.
The addition of volunteers and volunteerGroups fields establishes clear relationships for volunteer management within events.
265-274: LGTM! EventVolunteer type well structured with comprehensive tracking.
The type effectively captures volunteer participation with proper relationships to users, events, groups, and assignments, along with time tracking capabilities.
283-287: LGTM! VolunteerRank type is well-designed for leaderboard functionality.
The type effectively captures the essential information needed for a volunteer leaderboard.
309-315: LGTM! EventVolunteerGroup properly extended with description and assignments.
The additions improve group management capabilities while maintaining proper relationships.
317-326: LGTM! VolunteerMembership type properly structured for membership management.
The type effectively captures all necessary fields for managing volunteer memberships with proper relationships and audit fields.
tests/resolvers/Mutation/updateActionItem.spec.ts (2)
8-9: LGTM: New error constants and types for volunteer management.
The addition of volunteer-related error constants and types aligns well with the PR objectives of implementing volunteer management features.
Also applies to: 29-31
Line range hint 666-686: LGTM: Edge case handling for missing user profile.
Good test coverage for the edge case where a user doesn't have an app user profile.
schema.graphql (1)
8-12:
Consider adding validation for assignee fields.
The ActionItem type now supports multiple assignee fields (assignee, assigneeGroup, assigneeUser) without clear validation rules. This could lead to data integrity issues if multiple fields are set simultaneously.
Consider:
- Adding validation to ensure only one assignee field is set at a time
- Using a union type to represent different assignee types:
+union ActionItemAssignee = EventVolunteer | EventVolunteerGroup | User
type ActionItem {
_id: ID!
actionItemCategory: ActionItemCategory
allottedHours: Float
- assignee: EventVolunteer
- assigneeGroup: EventVolunteerGroup
- assigneeType: String!
- assigneeUser: User
+ assignee: ActionItemAssignee!
+ assigneeType: AssigneeType!
# ... other fields
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (3)
757-758: LGTM! Event type properly extended for volunteer management
The Event type has been correctly extended to support both individual volunteers and volunteer groups.
829-837: LGTM! Comprehensive volunteer tracking implementation
The EventVolunteer type provides robust volunteer management features including:
- Action item assignments
- Group memberships
- Hours tracking with history
- Acceptance status
- Visibility control
3244-3249: LGTM! Well-structured volunteer ranking implementation
The VolunteerRank type provides the essential fields needed for implementing a volunteer leaderboard feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/typeDefs/types.ts (3)
259-260: Add field descriptions for better documentation.Consider adding descriptions to clarify the purpose of these fields:
+ """ + List of volunteers associated with this event + """ volunteers: [EventVolunteer] + """ + List of volunteer groups organized for this event + """ volunteerGroups: [EventVolunteerGroup]
283-287: Add type description for better documentation.Consider adding a description to clarify the purpose of this type:
+""" +Represents a volunteer's ranking based on their contributed hours +""" type VolunteerRank { rank: Int! user: User! hoursVolunteered: Float! }
309-315: Add field descriptions for better documentation.Consider adding descriptions to clarify the purpose of these fields:
+ """ + Detailed description of the volunteer group's purpose and responsibilities + """ description: String createdAt: DateTime! updatedAt: DateTime! volunteers: [EventVolunteer] volunteersRequired: Int + """ + List of action items assigned to this volunteer group + """ assignments: [ActionItem]schema.graphql (1)
Line range hint
772-772: Consider adding validation for volunteersRequired field.The
volunteersRequiredfield inEventVolunteerGroupshould have a minimum value constraint to ensure valid group sizes.Consider using a custom scalar or adding a validation directive:
- volunteersRequired: Int + volunteersRequired: PositiveInt
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
schema.graphql(18 hunks)src/constants.ts(1 hunks)src/models/ActionItem.ts(6 hunks)src/resolvers/Query/index.ts(5 hunks)src/typeDefs/inputs.ts(5 hunks)src/typeDefs/queries.ts(2 hunks)src/typeDefs/types.ts(3 hunks)src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts(42 hunks)tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/constants.ts
- src/models/ActionItem.ts
- src/resolvers/Query/index.ts
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts
- tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2615
File: src/typeDefs/types.ts:269-270
Timestamp: 2024-10-27T19:17:47.166Z
Learning: In `src/typeDefs/types.ts`, within the `EventVolunteer` type, the fields `isPublic` and `hasAccepted` are considered to have self-explanatory names and do not require additional documentation or renaming.
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/typeDefs/queries.ts (6)
19-24: LGTM: Well-structured query definition for action items.
The query follows consistent patterns with other similar queries in the codebase, providing good filtering and sorting capabilities while maintaining backward compatibility with optional parameters.
63-63: LGTM: Backward-compatible enhancement.
The addition of the optional upcomingOnly parameter enhances filtering capabilities while maintaining backward compatibility.
69-72: Skip: Breaking change already addressed.
75-77: Skip: Breaking change already addressed.
79-82: LGTM: Well-structured volunteer membership query.
The query follows the established pattern for membership-related queries with appropriate parameter requirements and return type.
84-88: LGTM: Well-structured volunteer ranks query.
The query definition aligns perfectly with the volunteer leaderboard feature requirements, using appropriate parameter requirements and return type.
src/typeDefs/types.ts (3)
82-82: Good catch on fixing the typo!
The spelling correction from allotedHours to allottedHours improves code consistency.
265-274: LGTM! The changes enhance volunteer management capabilities.
The modifications to EventVolunteer type properly structure the relationship between volunteers and events, with appropriate tracking of hours and assignments.
317-326: LGTM! The type properly models volunteer membership relationships.
The VolunteerMembership type effectively captures the relationship between volunteers, events, and groups, with appropriate tracking of creation and updates.
schema.graphql (1)
Line range hint 1-2170: Schema structure looks good!
The schema maintains good separation of concerns and follows GraphQL best practices. The new volunteer management types are well-integrated with existing types like Event and ActionItem.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (3)
829-837: LGTM! Well-structured volunteer tracking implementation
The EventVolunteer type has been enhanced with fields that effectively track assignments, hours, and group memberships. The addition of hoursHistory provides good audit capability.
3277-3289: LGTM! Well-designed leaderboard support
The VolunteerRank type and its input type effectively support leaderboard functionality with proper pagination and filtering capabilities.
2312-2313: LGTM! Comprehensive query and mutation support
The added queries and mutations provide complete CRUD operations for volunteer management with proper filtering and sorting capabilities.
Also applies to: 1539-1541, 1938-1941
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature, refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2585
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Summary
VolunteerMembershipModel to handle request/invitation for volunteer groupsDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
eventsByOrganizationConnectionresolver to include upcoming events filtering.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
getVolunteerMembershipandgetVolunteerRanksresolvers.adminCheckutility and related functions.createActionItemandupdateVolunteerMembershipmutations.