Make PlotPeaks robust enough that we don't need --writable-tempfs in singularity/apptainer #174
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Attempt to manage xvfb outside of nipype so we can use a writable temp dir. We've had so much trouble with FURY plotting that we added the
--skip-odf-reports
to bypass them. But they are pretty and useful, so it would be great to get them working robustly.There is an error that isn't captured in the logs/stdout when trying to run qsirecon with --containall in singularity/apptainer. All we typically see is that node plot_peaks failed to run and that its output was not found.
Some things we know:
--writable-tempfs