Permuta is a Python library for working with perms (short for permutations), patterns, and mesh patterns.
If this code is useful to you in your work, please consider citing it. To generate a BibTeX entry (or another format), click the "DOI" badge above and locate the "Cite As" section.
If you need support, you can join us in our Discord support server.
To install Permuta on your system, run:
pip install permuta
It is also possible to install Permuta in development mode to work on the source code, in which case you run the following after cloning the repository:
./setup.py develop
To run the unit tests:
pip install -r test_requirements.txt
./setup.py test
Once you've installed Permuta, it can be imported by a Python script or an interactive Python session, just like any other Python library:
>>> from permuta import *
Importing *
supplies you with the 'Perm' and 'PermSet'
classes along with the 'AvoidanceClass' class (with alias 'Av') for generating
perms avoiding a set of patterns. It also gives you the 'MeshPatt' class
and some other submodules which we will not discuss in this readme.
Permutations are zero-based in Permuta and can be created using any iterable.
>>> Perm() # Empty perm
Perm(())
>>> Perm([]) # Another empty perm
Perm(())
>>> Perm((0, 1, 2, 3)) # The zero-based version of 1234
Perm((0, 1, 2, 3))
>>> Perm((2, 1, 3)) # Warning: it will initialise with any iterable
Perm((2, 1, 3))
Permutations can also be created using some specific class methods.
>>> Perm.from_string("201") # strings
Perm((2, 0, 1))
>>> Perm.one_based((1, 3, 2, 4)) # one-based iterable of integers
Perm((0, 2, 1, 3))
>>> Perm.to_standard("a2gsv3") # standardising any iterable using '<'
Perm((2, 0, 3, 4, 5, 1))
>>> Perm.from_integer(210) # an integer between 0 and 9876543210
Perm((2, 1, 0))
>>> Perm.from_integer(321) # any integer given is standardised
Perm((2, 1, 0))
>>> Perm.from_integer(201)
Perm((2, 0, 1))
Printing perms gives zero-based strings.
>>> print(Perm(()))
ε
>>> print(Perm((2, 1, 0)))
210
>>> print(Perm((6, 2, 10, 9, 3, 8, 0, 1, 5, 11, 4, 7)))
(6)(2)(10)(9)(3)(8)(0)(1)(5)(11)(4)(7)
To get an iterator of all permutations of a certain length you can use
>>> Perms4 = Perm.of_length(4)
You can run a for-loop over this iterator if you need to do something with all the permutations of this size. If you just want a specific permutation of this size you might be better off using the unrank function.
>>> Perm.unrank(23,4)
Perm((3, 2, 1, 0))
The avoids, contains, and occurrence methods enable working with patterns:
>>> p = Perm((0,2,1,3))
>>> p.contains(Perm((2, 1, 0)))
False
>>> p.avoids(Perm((0, 1)))
False
>>> list(p.occurrences_of(Perm((1, 0))))
[(1, 2)]
>>> list(Perm((0, 1)).occurrences_in(p))
[(0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 3), (2, 3)]
The basic symmetries are implemented:
>>> [p.reverse(), p.complement(), p.inverse()]
[Perm((3, 1, 2, 0)), Perm((3, 1, 2, 0)), Perm((0, 2, 1, 3))]
To take direct sums and skew sums we use +
and -
:
>>> q = Perm((0, 1, 2, 3, 4))
>>> p + q
Perm((0, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8))
>>> p - q
Perm((5, 7, 6, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4))
There are numerous practical methods available:
>>> list(p.fixed_points())
[0, 3]
>>> list(p.ascents())
[0, 2]
>>> list(p.descents())
[1]
>>> list(p.inversions())
[(1, 2)]
>>> p.major_index()
2
Perm classes are created by first specifying a basis and then calling the 'Av' class, to create the set of permutations avoiding the basis:
>>> basis = Basis(Perm((1, 0, 2)), Perm((1, 2, 0)))
>>> basis
Basis((Perm((1, 0, 2)), Perm((1, 2, 0))))
>>> perm_class = Av(basis)
>>> perm_class
Av(Basis((Perm((1, 0, 2)), Perm((1, 2, 0)))))
You can ask whether a perm belongs to the perm class:
>>> Perm((3, 2, 1, 0)) in perm_class
True
>>> Perm((0, 2, 1, 3)) in perm_class
False
You can get its enumeration up to a fixed length.
>>> perm_class.enumeration(10)
[1, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512]
>>> perm_class.count(11)
1024
You can also look to see if some well know enumeration strategies apply to a given class.
>>> from permuta.enumeration_strategies import find_strategies
>>> basis = [Perm((3, 2, 0, 1)), Perm((1, 0, 2, 3))]
>>> for strat in find_strategies(basis):
... print(strat.reference())
The insertion encoding of permutations: Corollary 10
>>> basis = [Perm((1, 2, 0, 3)), Perm((2, 0, 1, 3)), Perm((0, 1, 2, 3))]
>>> for strat in find_strategies(basis):
... print(strat.reference())
Enumeration of Permutation Classes and Weighted Labelled Independent Sets: Corollary 4.3
>>> basis = [Perm((1, 3, 0, 2)), Perm((2, 0, 3, 1))]
>>> for strat in find_strategies(basis):
... print(strat.reference())
Enumeration of Permutation Classes and Weighted Labelled Independent Sets: Corollary 4.6
The class contains only finitely many simple permutations
The output is the name of a paper, followed by the statement in the paper where the enumeration strategy is discussed or stated.
With the PermutationStatistic
class we can look for distributions of statistics for
classes and look for statistics preservations (or transformation) either for two classes
or given a bijection. First we need to import it.
>>> from permuta.permutils.statistics import PermutationStatistic
To see a distribution for a given statistic we grab its instance and provide a length and a class (no class will use the set of all permutations).
>>> PermutationStatistic.show_predefined_statistics() # Show all statistics with id
[0] Number of inversions
[1] Number of non-inversions
[2] Major index
[3] Number of descents
[4] Number of ascents
[5] Number of peaks
[6] Number of valleys
[7] Number of cycles
[8] Number of left-to-right minimas
[9] Number of left-to-right maximas
[10] Number of right-to-left minimas
[11] Number of right-to-left maximas
[12] Number of fixed points
[13] Order
[14] Longest increasing subsequence
[15] Longest decreasing subsequence
[16] Depth
[17] Number of bounces
[18] Maximum drop size
[19] Number of primes in the column sums
[20] Holeyness of a permutation
[21] Number of stack-sorts needed
[22] Number of pop-stack-sorts needed
[23] Number of pinnacles
[24] Number of cyclic peaks
[25] Number of cyclic valleys
[26] Number of double excedance
[27] Number of double drops
[28] Number of foremaxima
[29] Number of afterminima
[30] Number of aftermaxima
[31] Number of foreminima
>>> depth = PermutationStatistic.get_by_index(16)
>>> depth.distribution_for_length(5)
[1, 4, 12, 24, 35, 24, 20]
>>> depth.distribution_up_to(4, Av.from_string("123"))
[[1], [1], [1, 1], [0, 2, 3], [0, 0, 3, 7, 4]]
Given a bijection as a dictionary, we can check which statistics are preserved with
check_all_preservations
and which are transformed with check_all_transformed
>>> bijection = {p: p.reverse() for p in Perm.up_to_length(5)}
>>> for stat in PermutationStatistic.check_all_preservations(bijection):
... print(stat)
Number of peaks
Number of valleys
Holeyness of a permutation
Number of pinnacles
We can find all (predefined) statistics equally distributed over two permutation
classes with equally_distributed
. We also support checks for joint distribution
of more than one statistics with jointly_equally_distributed
and transformation
of jointly distributed stats with jointly_transformed_equally_distributed
.
>>> cls1 = Av.from_string("2143,415263")
>>> cls2 = Av.from_string("3142")
>>> for stat in PermutationStatistic.equally_distributed(cls1, cls2, 6):
... print(stat)
Major index
Number of descents
Number of ascents
Number of peaks
Number of valleys
Number of left-to-right minimas
Number of right-to-left maximas
Longest increasing subsequence
Longest decreasing subsequence
Number of pinnacles
The BiSC algorithm can tell you what mesh patterns are avoided by a set of permutations. Although the output of the algorithm is only guaranteed to describe the finite inputted set of permutations, the user usually hopes that the patterns found by the algorithm describe an infinite set of permutatations. To use the algorithm we first need to import it.
>>> from permuta.bisc import *
A classic example of a set of permutations described by pattern avoidance are
the permutations sortable in one pass through a stack. We use the function
stack_sortable
which returns True
for permutations that satisfy this
property. The user now has two choices: Run
auto_bisc(Perm.stack_sortable)
and let the algorithm run
without any more user input. It will try to use sensible values, starting by
learning small patterns from small permutations, and only considering longer
patterns when that fails. If the user wants to have more control over what
happens that is also possible and we now walk through that: We input the
property into bisc
and ask it to search for patterns of length 3.
>>> bisc(Perm.stack_sortable, 3)
I will use permutations up to length 7
{3: {Perm((1, 2, 0)): [set()]}}
When this command is run without specifying what length of permutations you
want to consider, bisc
will create permutations up to length 7 that satisfy
the property of being stack-sortable. The output means: There is a single
length 3 pattern found, and its underlying classical pattern is the permutation
Perm((1, 2, 0))
. Ignore the [set()]
in the output for now. We can use
show_me
to get a better visualization of the patterns found. In this call
to the algorithm we also specify that only permutations up to length 5 should
be considered.
>>> SG = bisc(Perm.stack_sortable, 3, 5)
>>> show_me(SG)
There are 1 underlying classical patterns of length 3
There are 1 different shadings on 120
The number of sets to monitor at the start of the clean-up phase is 1
<BLANKLINE>
Now displaying the patterns
<BLANKLINE>
| | |
-+-●-+-
| | |
-●-+-+-
| | |
-+-+-●-
| | |
<BLANKLINE>
We should ignore the The number of sets to monitor at the start of the clean-up phase
is 1
message for now.
We do not really need this algorithm for sets of permutations described by the avoidance of classical patterns. Its main purpose is to describe sets with mesh patterns, such as the West-2-stack-sortable permutations
>>> SG = bisc(Perm.west_2_stack_sortable, 5, 7)
>>> show_me(SG)
There are 2 underlying classical patterns of length 4
There are 1 different shadings on 1230
There are 1 different shadings on 2130
The number of sets to monitor at the start of the clean-up phase is 1
There are 1 underlying classical patterns of length 5
There are 1 different shadings on 42130
<BLANKLINE>
Now displaying the patterns
<BLANKLINE>
| | | |
-+-+-●-+-
| | | |
-+-●-+-+-
| | | |
-●-+-+-+-
| | | |
-+-+-+-●-
| | | |
<BLANKLINE>
|▒| | |
-+-+-●-+-
| | | |
-●-+-+-+-
| | | |
-+-●-+-+-
| | | |
-+-+-+-●-
| | | |
<BLANKLINE>
|▒| | | |
-●-+-+-+-+-
| |▒| | |
-+-+-+-●-+-
| | | | |
-+-●-+-+-+-
| | | | |
-+-+-●-+-+-
| | | | |
-+-+-+-+-●-
| | | | |
<BLANKLINE>
This is good news and bad news. Good because we quickly got a description of the set we were looking at, that would have taken a long time to find by hand. The bad news is that there is actually some redundancy in the output. To understand better what is going on we will start by putting the permutations under investigation in a dictionary, which keeps them separated by length.
>>> A, B = create_bisc_input(7, Perm.west_2_stack_sortable)
This creates two dictionaries with keys 1, 2, ..., 7 such that A[i]
points
to the list of permutations of length i
that are West-2-stack-sortable, and
B[i]
points to the complement. We can pass the A dictionary directly into
BiSC since only the permutations satisfying the property are used to find the
patterns. We can use the second dictionary to check whether every permutation
in the complement contains at least one of the patterns we found.
>>> SG = bisc(A, 5, 7)
>>> patterns_suffice_for_bad(SG, 7, B)
Starting sanity check with bad perms
Now checking permutations of length 0
Now checking permutations of length 1
Now checking permutations of length 2
Now checking permutations of length 3
Now checking permutations of length 4
Now checking permutations of length 5
Now checking permutations of length 6
Now checking permutations of length 7
Sanity check passes for the bad perms
(True, [])
In this case it is true that every permutation in B, up to length 7, contains at least one of the patterns found. Had that not been the case a list of permutations would have been outputted (instead of just the empty list).
Now, we claim that there is actually redundancy in the patterns we found, and
the length 4 mesh patterns should be enough to describe the set. This can occur
and it can be tricky to theoretically prove that one mesh pattern is implied
by another pattern (or a set of others, as is the case here). We use the dictionary
B
again and run
>>> bases, dict_numbs_to_patts = run_clean_up(SG, B)
<BLANKLINE>
The bases found have lengths
[2]
There is one basis of mesh patterns found, with 2 patterns
>>> show_me_basis(bases[0], dict_numbs_to_patts)
<BLANKLINE>
Displaying the patterns in the basis
<BLANKLINE>
| | | |
-+-+-●-+-
| | | |
-+-●-+-+-
| | | |
-●-+-+-+-
| | | |
-+-+-+-●-
| | | |
<BLANKLINE>
|▒| | |
-+-+-●-+-
| | | |
-●-+-+-+-
| | | |
-+-●-+-+-
| | | |
-+-+-+-●-
| | | |
<BLANKLINE>
This is the output we were expecting. There are several other properties of
permutations that can be imported from permuta.bisc.perm_properties
, such
as smooth
, forest-like
, baxter
, simsun
, quick_sortable
, etc.
Both bisc
and auto_bisc
can accept input in the form of a property,
or a list of permutations (satisfying some property).
BSD-3: see the LICENSE file.
If you found this library helpful with your research and would like to cite us, you can use the following BibTeX or go to Zenodo for alternative formats.