Skip to content

We estimate the potential carbon store of different ecosystems of the world

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

PhilipsonChristopher/CarbonPotential

Repository files navigation

Carbon Potential

We estimate the carbon potential of all Biomes and their Ecoregions using published global datasets

This is a collaborative project. Please contact us if you wish to contribute.

Joel Fiddes and Christopher Philipson

The aim is to estimate both the soil and plant carbon potential for all global terrestrial Biomes and Ecoregions.

Example Biomes

For areas of low human impact, we explore the relationship between Soil Oganic Carbon (SOC), Plant Carbon and Canopy Cover for all Biomes accounting for variation in Ecoregions. Here we present four example Biomes: Fig 2 Fig 2. The relationship between carbon density and canopy cover for ‘low impact areas’. Data are presented as a heat scatter plot with separate columns for Aboveground Carbon Density (first column), Soil Organic Carbon (second column) and Total Carbon (third column). We present four example Biomes: In the first row, tropical moist forests, in the second row, tropical coniferous forests, in the third row tropical grasslands, savannahs & schrublands, and in the forth row mangroves. All biomes are presented in Fig S1. Frequency density plots adjacent to the axis highlight the distribution of each variable (carbon density and canopy cover) and therefor the highlight most common canopy cover % and most common carbon density independently of their relationship.

Methods

Low impact areas mask

In order to estimate the carbon potential of undisturbed ecosystems, we only sample Low Impact Areas (LIA) as defined in Jacobson et al. (2019). The reason for this is that we aim to estimate the carbon potential in ecosystems close to an undisturbed state as possible.

Input datasets

We use the following datasets. We are open to using other datasets if available (dependent on funding for computational time).

Dataset Resolution Unit Time ref Reference Shortname URL
Global Forest Change 30m % 2000 Hansen et al. (2013) HANSEN https://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest
Low Impact Areas 1km NA 2006-2015 Jacobson et al. (2019) LIA https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50558-6
Global Forest Watch Above ground biomass 30m Mg/Ha 2000 Woods Hole Research Center; See also Baccini et al.(2012) GFW https://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/aboveground-live-woody-biomass-density?geometry=-117.070%2C-21.549%2C33.047%2C70.520
Hengl Soil organic carbon 250m Mg/ha 2000-2017 Hengl et al.(2017) HENGL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 https://soilgrids.org/#!/?layer=ORCDRC_M_sl2_250m&vector=1 https://files.isric.org

Woods Hole Research Center. Unpublished data. Accessed through Global Forest Watch Climate March 2020. climate.globalforestwatch.org

Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Ruiperez Gonzalez M, Kilibarda M, Blagotić A, et al. (2017) SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0169748.

Computational steps:

We follow these computational steps to generate datasets of soil organic carbon (SOC), aboveground biomass (AGB) and canopy cover (CANOPY) for all Ecoregions

1. Retrieve all global data

To retrieve all global data tiles (AGB, SOC, CANOPY), we loop the algorithm over all tiles that constitute the entire global land surface. The AGB tiles define the computation domain.

2. Resample

Resample SOC and LIA tiles to a common 30m grid

3. Mask Low Impact Areas

Mask all data layers by LIA to extract data only from low impact regions for further analysis.

4. Random Sample

Extract a 10000 random-point sample of values of each component (SOC, AGB and CANOPY) for each ecoregion. This results in a number of results tables per tile (AGB, SOC, CANOPY, 3 cols x 10000 rows) equal to number of ecoregions within a tile.

5. Aggregate tiles

Finally, we aggregate all values by Ecoregion resulting in a global dataset of Ecoregions each with SOC, AGB, CANOPY.

6. Predictions and graphs

Results are plotted as xy density scatter plots per Biome, due to large size of datasets. We model the realtionship between carbon (each SOC and AGB) and canopy cover for each Biome using linear mixed effects models with a random effect for Ecoregion. We estimate the carbon potential by predicting the SOC and AGB at the mean canopy cover for each biome. We will do this at the ecoregion level.

Example Ecoregions

Five example ecoregions from Biome 1, 'Tropical & Subtropical Moist Broadleaf Forests' Fig 3

Table 2. Carbon Potential aggregated at the Biome level.

This is the average of all Ecoregions.

Biome # Canopy Cover (%) Plant Carbon (Mg/ha) SOC (Mg/ha) Biome name Bastin 2019 Area (Mha) Current SOC Stock (Gt) Plant Carbon Potential (Gt) Soil Carbon Potential (Gt)
1 83 217 501 Tropical & Subtropical Moist Broadleaf Forests 82 6.3 18 41
2 60 135 267 Tropical & Subtropical Dry Broadleaf Forests 19 0.5 3 5
3 60 149 372 Tropical & Subtropical Coniferous Forests 6.8 0.1 1 3
4 57 118 450 Temperate Broadleaf & Mixed Forests 123.5 5.8 15 56
5 40 130 419 Temperate Conifer Forests 39 1.9 5 16
6 41 49 826 Boreal Forests/Taiga 284.7 23.9 14 235
7 22 69 208 Tropical & Subtropical Grasslands, Savannas & Shrublands 166.2 2.3 11 35
8 12 58 302 Temperate Grasslands, Savannas & Shrublands 92.4 3.7 5 28
9 18 39 363 Flooded Grasslands & Savannas 8.3 0.3 0 3
10 13 61 370 Montane Grasslands & Shrublands 18.4 1.4 1 7
11 5 21 889 Tundra 110.9 16.5 2 99
12 21 68 206 Mediterranean Forests, Woodlands & Scrub 18.5 0.5 1 4
13 3 30 141 Deserts & Xeric Shrublands 73.7 2.1 2 10
14 87 248 905 Mangroves 2.1 0.2 1 2
Total 65.5 (Gt) 79 (Gt) 544 (Gt)

About

We estimate the potential carbon store of different ecosystems of the world

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages