feat(apps/prod/tekton/configs): support tibuild trigger with custom builder image

[wuhuizuo]

User description

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Configuration changes

---

Description

• Added force-builder-image parameter to pipeline and task configurations to support custom builder images.
• Updated branch push, PR, and tag create triggers to extract builder-image from headers and include force-builder-image parameter.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	pingcap-build-package.yaml Add force-builder-image parameter to pipeline configuration apps/prod/tekton/configs/pipelines/pingcap-build-package.yaml Added force-builder-image parameter to specify a custom builder image. Updated task parameters to include force-builder-image. +8/-0      pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml Support custom builder image in get-builder-image task      apps/prod/tekton/configs/tasks/pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml Added force-builder-image parameter to task configuration. Updated script to use force-builder-image if provided. +13/-1
Configuration changes	fake-github-branch-push.yaml Add custom builder image support to branch push trigger    apps/prod/tekton/configs/triggers/triggers/_/fake-github/fake-github-branch-push.yaml Added custom-params key to extract builder-image from headers. Included force-builder-image parameter in trigger template. +6/-0      fake-github-pr.yaml Add custom builder image support to PR trigger                      apps/prod/tekton/configs/triggers/triggers/_/fake-github/fake-github-pr.yaml Added custom-params key to extract builder-image from headers. Included force-builder-image parameter in trigger template. +6/-0      fake-github-tag-create.yaml Add custom builder image support to tag create trigger      apps/prod/tekton/configs/triggers/triggers/_/fake-github/fake-github-tag-create.yaml Added custom-params key to extract builder-image from headers. Included force-builder-image parameter in trigger template. +6/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the key changes made are to support a custom builder image for the tibuild trigger. The changes involve adding a new parameter called force-builder-image to the pingcap-build-package.yaml and pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml files, and passing it to the build-component template in the fake-github trigger files.

Potential problems with this pull request include:

• It is unclear whether the new parameter will work as expected, as there is no documentation or explanation provided for how it should be used.
• It is possible that the changes could introduce new bugs or conflicts with existing functionality.
• It is not clear whether the changes have been tested thoroughly enough to ensure that they will not cause any problems in production.

Some fixing suggestions for this pull request would be:

• Add documentation or comments to the code to explain how the new force-builder-image parameter should be used and what its effects are.
• Test the changes thoroughly in a staging or development environment before merging them into production.
• Consider adding more detailed logging or error handling to the code to help diagnose any issues that may arise from the changes.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the changes aim to support a custom builder image for the Tibuild trigger. The diff shows that several files are modified to add a new parameter force-builder-image which can be used to specify a custom builder image for building binaries.

Here are some potential problems that I noticed:

• The pull request description is too brief and does not provide enough context about the changes made to the code. It would be helpful if the author could provide more details about the motivation behind the changes and how they impact the overall system.
• There is no documentation or examples provided to show how to use the newly added force-builder-image parameter. It would be helpful to have some guidance on how to use this parameter correctly.
• It's not clear if the changes made to the pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml task are backwards compatible with existing configurations. If not, this could break existing workflows that rely on this task.

Here are some suggestions for fixing the potential problems:

• The author should update the pull request description to provide more context about the changes made and how they impact the system. This will make it easier for the reviewer and other team members to understand the changes and provide feedback.
• The author should provide documentation or examples on how to use the force-builder-image parameter. This will help users understand how to use this parameter correctly and avoid potential errors.
• The author should verify that the changes made to the pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml task are backwards compatible with existing configurations. If not, they should provide a migration guide or some other means of helping users update their workflows to use the new configuration.

[wuhuizuo]

/help

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Agent Walkthrough 🤖

Welcome to the PR Agent, an AI-powered tool for automated pull request analysis, feedback, suggestions and more.

Here is a list of tools you can use to interact with the PR Agent:

Tool	Description	Trigger Interactively 💎
DESCRIBE	Generates PR description - title, type, summary, code walkthrough and labels	Run
REVIEW	Adjustable feedback about the PR, possible issues, security concerns, review effort and more	Run
IMPROVE	Code suggestions for improving the PR	Run
UPDATE CHANGELOG	Automatically updates the changelog	Run
ADD DOCS 💎	Generates documentation to methods/functions/classes that changed in the PR	Run
TEST 💎	Generates unit tests for a specific component, based on the PR code change	Run
IMPROVE COMPONENT 💎	Code suggestions for a specific component that changed in the PR	Run
ANALYZE 💎	Identifies code components that changed in the PR, and enables to interactively generate tests, docs, and code suggestions for each component	Run
ASK	Answering free-text questions about the PR	[*]
GENERATE CUSTOM LABELS 💎	Generates custom labels for the PR, based on specific guidelines defined by the user	[*]
CI FEEDBACK 💎	Generates feedback and analysis for a failed CI job	[*]
CUSTOM PROMPT 💎	Generates custom suggestions for improving the PR code, derived only from a specific guidelines prompt defined by the user	[*]
SIMILAR ISSUE	Automatically retrieves and presents similar issues	[*]

(1) Note that each tool be triggered automatically when a new PR is opened, or called manually by commenting on a PR.

(2) Tools marked with [*] require additional parameters to be passed. For example, to invoke the /ask tool, you need to comment on a PR: /ask "<question content>". See the relevant documentation for each tool for more details.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (a24f589)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Typo in Default: In the description of the force-builder-image parameter, "Defalt" should be corrected to "Default". Consistency in Scripting: Ensure that the script logic added for checking force-builder-image is consistent and error-free. It would be beneficial to review the exit conditions and error handling within the script to ensure robustness. Parameter Usage: The addition of force-builder-image across multiple files suggests significant changes in behavior. It's crucial to ensure that these changes are well-documented and that the parameter is used consistently across all modified files.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Correct a typo in the description of the force-builder-image parameter There is a typo in the description of the force-builder-image parameter. The word "Defalt" should be corrected to "Default" to ensure clarity and professionalism. apps/prod/tekton/configs/pipelines/pingcap-build-package.yaml [45] -Defalt the task will complete one from config in artifacts.git repo. +Default the task will complete one from config in artifacts.git repo. Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies and fixes a typo in the new code, which improves the professionalism of the documentation.	7
	Align the custom-params expression properly for consistent indentation The custom-params expression should be aligned properly with the surrounding code to maintain consistent indentation and readability. apps/prod/tekton/configs/triggers/triggers/_/fake-github/fake-github-branch-push.yaml [56] -'builder-image': header.canonical('ce-param-builder-image'), +'builder-image': header.canonical('ce-param-builder-image') Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Proper indentation improves readability and maintainability, but the suggested change does not significantly alter the functionality or structure of the code.	5
Enhancement	Rename the get step to fetch-builder-image for better readability and maintainability To improve readability and maintainability, consider using a more descriptive name for the get step. This will make it clearer what the step is doing at a glance. apps/prod/tekton/configs/tasks/pingcap-get-builder-image.yaml [38] -- name: get +- name: fetch-builder-image Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to rename the step enhances clarity and maintainability, although it's not critical for functionality.	6

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request description and the diff provided, the key changes made are:

• Added force-builder-image parameter to pipeline and task configurations to support custom builder images.
• Updated branch push, PR, and tag create triggers to extract builder-image from headers and include force-builder-image parameter.

The changes seem reasonable, and the pull request description provides clear explanations of the changes made. However, there are a few potential problems that should be noted:

• It may be better to provide a default value for force-builder-image rather than leaving it as an empty string. This could cause confusion or errors if the parameter is not correctly set.
• It's unclear what happens if both builder-image and force-builder-image are provided. This should be documented or clarified in the code.
• It's also unclear if there are any restrictions or requirements for the custom builder image. It may be worth adding some documentation or validation to ensure that the image is valid.

To fix these issues, I would suggest:

• Providing a default value for force-builder-image to ensure that it is always set correctly.
• Adding validation to ensure that only one of builder-image or force-builder-image is set, or clarifying what happens if both are set.
• Adding documentation or validation to ensure that the custom builder image is valid and meets any requirements.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request's title and description, the changes introduced in this PR are related to supporting custom builder images in the Tibuild trigger. The PR introduces a new parameter force-builder-image to the pipeline and task configurations, and updates the branch push, PR, and tag create triggers to extract builder-image from headers and include force-builder-image parameter.

Regarding potential problems, there could be some issues with the implementation of the new parameter. Also, if there are other parts of the codebase that rely on the old behavior, the new changes could break those parts.

To address these potential problems, it would be helpful to add some additional tests to ensure that the new changes do not break any existing functionality. Additionally, it might be beneficial to double-check that the parameter names and types are consistent with other parts of the codebase and adhere to best practices.

Overall, the changes look good, and the PR seems to be well-documented. However, I suggest adding more tests and double-checking the parameter names and types to ensure consistency throughout the codebase.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

Changelog updates: 🔄

2024-07-04

Added

• Support for custom builder images in pipeline and task configurations with the force-builder-image parameter.
• Triggers updated to extract builder-image from headers and include force-builder-image parameter.

to commit the new content to the CHANGELOG.md file, please type:
'/update_changelog --pr_update_changelog.push_changelog_changes=true'

[wuhuizuo]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• apps/prod/OWNERS [wuhuizuo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment