Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(charts/prow): adjust the probes #1256

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

fix(charts/prow): adjust the probes #1256

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title, it looks like the changes are specific to the charts/prow directory and related to adjusting the probes. The diff shows that the version number in the Chart.yaml file has been updated from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10.

Without any additional information in the description or in the code changes, it's hard to identify any potential problems. However, it's always a good practice to check if the new changes introduced have any impact on the existing functionalities and the overall performance of the application.

As for the suggested fix, assuming that the changes in the pull request are necessary and appropriate, I would recommend testing the new version thoroughly before merging the pull request. It's also important to ensure that the version number is updated accurately and follows the semantic versioning guidelines.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the changes, it seems that this pull request is fixing an issue with the probes in the Tide deployment in the prow chart. The changes include increasing the initialDelaySeconds and timeoutSeconds for both the liveness and readiness probes.

One potential problem I see is that the resource limits and requests for the Tide deployment have been commented out. It's best to always specify resource limits and requests to ensure that the application can handle the expected load and to prevent resource starvation.

A suggestion for fixing this would be to uncomment the resource limits and requests and adjust them accordingly based on the expected usage. Additionally, it might be helpful to add a brief description of why these changes were made in the pull request description for future reference.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/S and removed size/XS labels Sep 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request is titled "fix(charts/prow): adjust the probes" and includes changes to the charts/prow directory, which is likely related to the deployment of Prow, a continuous integration and deployment tool for Kubernetes.

The changes include updating the version number in Chart.yaml from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10, as well as modifying the initialDelaySeconds and timeoutSeconds values in the readinessProbe and livenessProbe sections of the tide deployment in deployment.yaml. Additionally, the resources section under tide in values.yaml has been commented out.

Overall, the changes appear to be focused on adjusting probe timing and resource allocation. However, there are a few potential problems to consider.

First, it is unclear why the resources section under tide in values.yaml has been commented out. This may be intentional, but it is worth confirming with the author of the pull request.

Second, the changes to the readinessProbe and livenessProbe sections may affect the availability and stability of the deployment. It is important to ensure that these values have been tested and validated before merging the pull request.

Finally, it is recommended to perform a thorough review of the entire Prow deployment to ensure that these changes do not have any unintended consequences.

For suggested fixes, it is recommended to follow up with the author of the pull request to clarify the reasoning behind the commented-out resources section. Additionally, it is recommended to thoroughly test the adjusted probe timing values before merging the pull request. Finally, a comprehensive review of the entire Prow deployment may help catch any additional issues that may arise from these changes.

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request is updating the version of the application being deployed in the Chart.yaml file and adding a startupProbe to the tide deployment in the deployment.yaml file.

The potential problem is that the initialDelaySeconds for the livenessProbe and startupProbe have been increased from 30 to 60 seconds and the timeoutSeconds for the livenessProbe and readinessProbe have been increased from 5 to 10 seconds. This may cause the containers to take longer to start up and may increase the time for detecting and recovering from failures.

To fix this, we can reduce the initialDelaySeconds and timeoutSeconds to a reasonable value, like 30 seconds for initialDelaySeconds and 5 seconds for timeoutSeconds. Additionally, we can consider adding resource limits and requests for the tide deployment to ensure that it is not over or underutilized.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Sep 10, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit b8b1b9c into main Sep 10, 2024
6 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/prow-chart branch September 10, 2024 10:12
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
…rces (#1257)

Ref #1256

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant