Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency esbuild to v0.14.38 #75

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 21, 2022

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
esbuild 0.14.36 -> 0.14.38 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild

v0.14.38

Compare Source

  • Further fixes to TypeScript 4.7 instantiation expression parsing (#​2201)

    This release fixes some additional edge cases with parsing instantiation expressions from the upcoming version 4.7 of TypeScript. Previously it was allowed for an instantiation expression to precede a binary operator but with this release, that's no longer allowed. This was sometimes valid in the TypeScript 4.7 beta but is no longer allowed in the latest version of TypeScript 4.7. Fixing this also fixed a regression that was introduced by the previous release of esbuild:

    Code TS 4.6.3 TS 4.7.0 beta TS 4.7.0 nightly esbuild 0.14.36 esbuild 0.14.37 esbuild 0.14.38
    a<b> == c<d> Invalid a == c Invalid a == c a == c Invalid
    a<b> in c<d> Invalid Invalid Invalid Invalid a in c Invalid
    a<b>>=c<d> Invalid Invalid Invalid Invalid a >= c Invalid
    a<b>=c<d> Invalid a < b >= c a = c a < b >= c a = c a = c
    a<b>>c<d> a < b >> c a < b >> c a < b >> c a < b >> c a > c a < b >> c

    This table illustrates some of the more significant changes between all of these parsers. The most important part is that esbuild 0.14.38 now matches the behavior of the latest TypeScript compiler for all of these cases.

v0.14.37

Compare Source

  • Add support for TypeScript's moduleSuffixes field from TypeScript 4.7

    The upcoming version of TypeScript adds the moduleSuffixes field to tsconfig.json that introduces more rules to import path resolution. Setting moduleSuffixes to [".ios", ".native", ""] will try to look at the the relative files ./foo.ios.ts, ./foo.native.ts, and finally ./foo.ts for an import path of ./foo. Note that the empty string "" in moduleSuffixes is necessary for TypeScript to also look-up ./foo.ts. This was announced in the TypeScript 4.7 beta blog post.

  • Match the new ASI behavior from TypeScript nightly builds (#​2188)

    This release updates esbuild to match some very recent behavior changes in the TypeScript parser regarding automatic semicolon insertion. For more information, see TypeScript issues #​48711 and #​48654 (I'm not linking to them directly to avoid Dependabot linkback spam on these issues due to esbuild's popularity). The result is that the following TypeScript code is now considered valid TypeScript syntax:

    class A<T> {}
    new A<number> /* ASI now happens here */
    if (0) {}
    
    interface B {
      (a: number): typeof a /* ASI now happens here */
      <T>(): void
    }

    This fix was contributed by @​g-plane.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency esbuild to v0.14.37 Update dependency esbuild to v0.14.38 Apr 22, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/esbuild-0.x branch from 6c3a4a8 to ccf64a4 Compare April 22, 2022 00:26
@louisgv louisgv closed this May 17, 2022
@louisgv louisgv deleted the renovate/esbuild-0.x branch June 16, 2022 22:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants