Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add possibility for Aerospike timeout configuration #83

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2020

Conversation

igor-ermolenko
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@igor-ermolenko igor-ermolenko requested a review from kptfh February 26, 2020 17:09
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #83 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop      #83      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      87.06%   86.91%   -0.16%     
+ Complexity       230      229       -1     
=============================================
  Files             24       24              
  Lines            804      810       +6     
  Branches          70       70              
=============================================
+ Hits             700      704       +4     
- Misses            71       72       +1     
- Partials          33       34       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...raph/aerospike/operations/AerospikeOperations.java 90.32% <100%> (+0.66%) 14 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...m/playtika/janusgraph/aerospike/ConfigOptions.java 95.83% <100%> (+0.83%) 1 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...raph/aerospike/operations/BasicLockOperations.java 84.39% <0%> (-1.42%) 37% <0%> (-1%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08cf616...ec0db1f. Read the comment docs.

@kptfh kptfh merged commit e36a3c6 into develop Feb 27, 2020
@kptfh kptfh deleted the feature/aerospike-timeouts-properties branch February 27, 2020 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants