Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for media cover deletion #387

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2019
Merged

Allow for media cover deletion #387

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2019

Conversation

trinity-1686a
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #356

Copy link
Contributor

@igalic igalic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sssiiiighqlite 🙀

@elegaanz
Copy link
Member

Maybe this change should be integrated in the migrations that introduced constraints, because when you run migrations on an instance with illustrated articles, you get this error:

Running migration 2018-12-08-175515_constraints
update or delete on table "medias" violates foreign key constraint "posts_cover_id_fkey" on table "posts"

(After seeing this error on baptiste.gelez.xyz I tried to manually fix it, but it just ended in an instance reset 😬)

(I don't think it is a good idea to change previous migrations, but we don't really have choice…)

@trinity-1686a
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BaptisteGelez I don't understand, what error did you run into? Is it when an article from before 2018-12-08-175515_constraints reference a no longer existing media?

@elegaanz
Copy link
Member

elegaanz commented Dec 29, 2018

It seem to happen when a media is used both as avatar and post cover. This query deletes it: https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/blob/master/migrations/postgres/2018-12-08-175515_constraints/up.sql#L51 but it fails because it is used on a post.

Edit: actually, the media doesn't need to be used as avatar. If it owned by a duplicate user, the query will fail.

Edit 2: the user doesn't even need to be duplicated. For instance, some user have an empty followers_endpoint property, because they were created at a time this property didn't exist.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #387 into master will increase coverage by 1.42%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #387      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   27.86%   29.29%   +1.42%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        6280     7671    +1391     
==========================================
+ Hits         1750     2247     +497     
- Misses       4530     5424     +894

Copy link
Member

@elegaanz elegaanz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Travis is happy, I think we can safely merge that. Thanks!

@trinity-1686a trinity-1686a merged commit aa72334 into master Jan 5, 2019
@trinity-1686a trinity-1686a deleted the delete-cover branch January 5, 2019 21:11
@agateblue
Copy link
Contributor

I'm facing the same issue described by @BaptisteGelez while applying this migration, and I cannot afford to reset my instance. Is there anything to do to manually fix the issue? I can run SQL by hand if needed :)

@elegaanz
Copy link
Member

elegaanz commented Feb 22, 2019

@EliotBerriot try to find user with empty followers_endpoint with SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE followers_endpoint = ''; and if anything is returned, edit the follower endpoint so that it has a value (it can be anything as long as it is not null, nor already used by another user). If I remember correctly, that's how I fixed it on fediverse.blog. Sorry for the bug… 😕

If it still doesn't work, try to check users.ap_url, user.inbox_url and user.outbox_url too.

@agateblue
Copy link
Contributor

@BaptisteGelez SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE followers_endpoint = ''; returned a bunch of users, and I updated it w ith UPDATE users SET followers_endpoint='noop' WHERE followers_endpoint = '';`

This is the current returns for all the attributes you mentions:

plume=# SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE ap_url = '';
 id | username 
----+----------
(0 rows)

plume=# SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE inbox_url = '';
 id | username 
----+----------
(0 rows)

plume=# SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE outbox_url = '';
 id | username 
----+----------
(0 rows)

plume=# SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE followers_endpoint = '';
 id | username 
----+----------
(0 rows)

Unfortunately, applying the migrations return the same error again:

eliotberriot@peeters:/srv/Plume$ docker-compose run --rm plume diesel migration run --migration-dir migrations/postgres/
Starting plume_postgres_1 ... done
Running migration 2018-12-08-175515_constraints
update or delete on table "medias" violates foreign key constraint "posts_cover_id_fkey" on table "posts"

The issues seems to lie within the medias/posts relation, so I'm not sure what it has to do with users?

Anyway, don't be sorry for this: I know the software was still in development and I could face this kind of bug, that was part of the deal :)

@elegaanz
Copy link
Member

Okay, so maybe try to reset the post covers (it will not impact your articles as you didn't used them for Funkwhale's blog), with UPDATE posts SET cover_id = null;. I don't know if it will fix the issue, but it is worth a try.

@agateblue
Copy link
Contributor

@BaptisteGelez at least with the cover_id thing I get another error:

eliotberriot@peeters:/srv/Plume$ docker-compose run --rm plume diesel migration run --migration-dir migrations/postgres/
Starting plume_postgres_1 ... done
Running migration 2018-12-08-175515_constraints
update or delete on table "comments" violates foreign key constraint "comments_in_response_to_id_fkey" on table "comments"

The issues is withing the comments_in_response_to_id_fkey constraint now

@elegaanz
Copy link
Member

I made this script that should delete comments with invalid ActivityPub URLs, and their replies.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION delete_comment (id int) RETURNS comments
AS $$
DECLARE
  r int;
BEGIN
  FOR r IN (SELECT id FROM comments WHERE in_response_to_id = id) LOOP
    SELECT delete_comment(r);
  END LOOP;
  DELETE FROM comments WHERE id = id;
END $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

SELECT delete_comment(id) FROM comments WHERE ap_url = '';

I didn't tested it, but it should only delete broken comments (and hopefully fix the migrations).

@agateblue
Copy link
Contributor

@BaptisteGelez unfortunately, this doesn't fix it (for me):

eliotberriot@peeters:/srv/Plume$ docker-compose exec postgres psql -U plume
psql (10.5 (Debian 10.5-2.pgdg90+1))
Type "help" for help.

plume=# 
plume=# 
plume=# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION delete_comment (id int) RETURNS comments
plume-# AS $$
plume$# DECLARE
plume$#   r int;
plume$# BEGIN
plume$#   FOR r IN (SELECT id FROM comments WHERE in_response_to_id = id) LOOP
plume$#     SELECT delete_comment(r);
plume$#   END LOOP;
plume$#   DELETE FROM comments WHERE id = id;
plume$# END $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE FUNCTION
plume=# 
plume=# SELECT delete_comment(id) FROM comments WHERE ap_url = '';
 delete_comment 
----------------
(0 rows)

plume=# \q

eliotberriot@peeters:/srv/Plume$ docker-compose run --rm plume diesel migration run --migration-dir migrations/postgres/
Starting plume_postgres_1 ... done
Running migration 2018-12-08-175515_constraints
update or delete on table "comments" violates foreign key constraint "comments_in_response_to_id_fkey" on table "comments"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants