-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update nodeinfo #446
Update nodeinfo #446
Conversation
But that will introduce another thing to do, plume use keeping 2.0 would be good anyway for compatibility. and for the schema version, if you add repository in a 2.0 version it will break on any parser forcing a validation, since 2.0 schema doesn't allow repository. |
Ok. I'll update that. Is it ok to make it two separate endpoints, |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #446 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 25.58% 25.45% -0.13%
==========================================
Files 63 63
Lines 6254 6285 +31
==========================================
Hits 1600 1600
- Misses 4654 4685 +31 |
Thank you! For the versions, adding a parameter in the route could indeed do the job. And I'm not sure the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! 👍
Fix #433
I added the repo link to Cargo.toml so that
software.repository
could be configurable like @rhaamo suggested. I don't know if it's ok to includesoftware.repository
without bumping the schema version, but I didn't know if that would break any clients that parse nodeinfo with a hardcoded schema version.