rm discourse references #16176
Merged
rm discourse references #16176
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zzstoatzz
requested review from
discdiver,
cicdw and
desertaxle
as code owners
zzstoatzz
commented
Dec 2, 2024
Comment on lines
+17
to
+18
| See the [Using Prefect Cloud with proxies](https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect/discussions/16175) | ||
| GitHub Discussion for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i moved that discourse post to a discussion to preserve the information
discdiver
reviewed
Dec 2, 2024
Co-authored-by: Jeff Hale <discdiver@users.noreply.github.com>
zzstoatzz
force-pushed
the
rm-more-discourse
branch
from
ff72af2 to
4e4c2c3
Compare
cicdw
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.