chore: remove unused field #767
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple changes across various files, primarily focusing on modifications to linter configurations in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/staking/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Line range hint
1-17: Consider documenting the rationale for removing thecdcfield.The removal of the
cdcfield from theKeeperstruct and the corresponding changes in theNewKeeperfunction are part of a broader effort to simplify keeper structures across the codebase. This is a positive change for maintainability.Consider adding a comment or updating the documentation to explain why the
cdcfield was removed and how codec functionality is now handled (if it's still needed). This will help future developers understand the reasoning behind these changes and prevent accidental reintroduction of unnecessary fields.x/evm/module.go (2)
Line range hint
84-90: Fix inconsistency inNewAppModulefunctionThe
legacySubspaceparameter has been removed from the function signature, which is correct. However, the function body still referenceslegacySubspacein theevm.NewAppModulecall. This will cause a compilation error.Please update the function body to remove the
legacySubspaceargument:-func NewAppModule(k *keeper.Keeper, accountKeeper evmtypes.AccountKeeper, legacySubspace evmtypes.Subspace) AppModule { +func NewAppModule(k *keeper.Keeper, accountKeeper evmtypes.AccountKeeper) AppModule { return AppModule{ - AppModule: evm.NewAppModule(k.Keeper, accountKeeper, legacySubspace), + AppModule: evm.NewAppModule(k.Keeper, accountKeeper), AppModuleBasic: AppModuleBasic{}, keeper: k, } }
Line range hint
1-153: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file primarily involve the removal of the
legacySubspacefield from theAppModulestruct and updates to theNewAppModulefunction. These modifications align with the PR objective of removing unused fields and simplify the module structure.However, please note the following:
- Ensure that the removal of
legacySubspacedoesn't affect any other parts of the codebase that might be expecting this field.- Update any tests or mock objects that might be relying on the old
AppModulestructure orNewAppModulefunction signature.- Verify that these changes don't introduce any breaking changes for users of this module.
After addressing the inconsistency in the
NewAppModulefunction and running the verification script, these changes should improve code maintainability without affecting functionality.x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
70-70: Approve changes and suggest cleanup.The changes in the
SetupTestmethod are consistent with the modifications in theKeeperMockSuitestruct. The removal ofwfxTokenAddrand commenting out ofmsgServerinitialization simplify the test setup.Consider the following suggestions for cleanup:
- If
msgServeris no longer needed, remove the commented line entirely instead of keeping it as a comment.- Update the test documentation to reflect these changes, if any exist.
- Verify that all test cases still pass after these modifications.
Also applies to: 124-124
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- .golangci.yml (1 hunks)
- app/export.go (0 hunks)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (0 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/staking_suite.go (0 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/erc20/keeper/keeper.go (0 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- app/export.go
- app/keepers/keepers.go
- tests/staking_suite.go
- x/erc20/keeper/keeper.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (14)
x/staking/keeper/keeper.go (1)
13-17: LGTM! Verify the impact of removing thecdcfield.The changes to the
NewKeeperfunction are consistent with the removal of thecdcfield from theKeeperstruct. This simplification is good for code maintainability.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the removed
cdcfield:If these searches return any results, we may need to update those locations as well.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of
cdcfield confirmed.No remaining references to
cdcfound in the staking module.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the removed `cdc` field in the staking keeper # Test 1: Search for any remaining uses of `k.cdc` or `keeper.cdc` in the staking module echo "Checking for remaining uses of k.cdc or keeper.cdc in the staking module:" rg 'k\.cdc|keeper\.cdc' x/staking # Test 2: Search for any remaining codec parameters in NewKeeper function calls echo "Checking for remaining codec parameters in NewKeeper function calls:" ast-grep --pattern 'NewKeeper($_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 384
tests/integration_test.go (2)
Line range hint
67-87: Review ERC20-related test calls inTestRunmethod.The
TestRunmethod still includes calls to ERC20-related tests (e.g.,ERC20TokenTest,FIP20CodeCheckTest), but theerc20field in theIntegrationTeststruct has been commented out. This inconsistency might lead to runtime errors or incomplete test coverage.Please review the
TestRunmethod and ensure that:
- All called test methods are still valid and available.
- The test coverage remains comprehensive despite the removal of the
erc20field.Consider running the following script to check for any potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for ERC20-related method calls in TestRun # Search for ERC20-related method calls in TestRun echo "Searching for ERC20-related method calls in TestRun:" ast-grep --pattern $'func \(suite \*IntegrationTest\) TestRun\(\) { $$$ suite.$_($$) $$$ }' | rg -i "erc20|fip20" # If any results are found, they might need to be reviewed or removed
43-46: Verify test execution and consider adding explanatory comments.The initialization of
erc20andprecompilefields has been commented out, consistent with the changes in theIntegrationTeststruct. To ensure code clarity and maintain documentation:
- Verify that the test suite executes without errors after these changes.
- Consider adding a comment explaining why these test suites have been excluded.
To verify the test execution, run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run the integration tests and check for any errors # Set the environment variable to run integration tests export TEST_INTEGRATION=true # Run the tests and capture the output go test -v ./tests/integration_test.go 2>&1 | tee test_output.log # Check for any error messages if grep -q "FAIL" test_output.log; then echo "Test execution failed. Please review the output." else echo "All tests passed successfully." fi # Clean up rm test_output.logConsider adding a comment above the commented-out lines to explain the reason for excluding these tests, e.g.:
// ERC20 and Precompile tests have been temporarily disabled due to [reason]. // TODO: Re-enable or replace these tests once [condition] is met..golangci.yml (2)
81-84: LGTM: Stricter unused checks align with PR objective.These new settings for the
unusedlinter make it more strict about what's considered "used":
- Writing to a field doesn't count as using it.
- Exported fields are not automatically considered used.
- Local variables are not automatically considered used.
This aligns well with the PR objective of removing unused fields, as it will help identify truly unused code more accurately.
Line range hint
85-145: LGTM: Refined linter configuration, but consider reviewing disabled rules.The changes to the
revivelinter configuration show a thoughtful approach to code quality:
- Enabled rules are carefully configured with specific arguments or exclusions.
- Many rules are explicitly disabled, allowing for more flexibility in code structure.
This configuration aligns with the project's needs while maintaining important checks. However, it's worth periodically reviewing the disabled rules to ensure they still align with the project's evolving coding standards.
To ensure these changes don't conflict with existing code style, let's check for any potential issues:
x/evm/module.go (1)
81-81: LGTM: Removal of unused fieldlegacySubspaceThe removal of the
legacySubspacefield from theAppModulestruct aligns with the PR objective of removing unused fields. This change simplifies the struct and reduces unnecessary dependencies.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
legacySubspacein the codebase:x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
35-39: Verify the impact of commenting out themsgServerfield.The
msgServerfield has been commented out in theKeeperMockSuitestruct. This change might affect test cases that previously relied on this field. Please ensure that:
- All test cases that used
msgServerhave been updated or removed.- The decision to comment out rather than remove the field is intentional and documented.
To check for any remaining usage of
msgServerin test cases, run:#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining usage of msgServer in test files rg 'suite\.msgServer' --type goIf this returns any results, those test cases may need to be updated.
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (2)
Line range hint
1-228: Overall assessment: Code changes look goodThe removal of the
bankkeeperfield from theKeeperstruct and the corresponding parameter from theNewKeeperfunction are the only significant changes in this file. These modifications simplify theKeeperstructure and its initialization.The rest of the file, including methods like
CallEVMWithoutGas,CallEVM, andIsContract, remains unchanged, which is appropriate given the scope of the changes.To ensure that the removal of the
bankkeeperdoesn't impact the functionality of the unchanged methods, please verify that these methods don't rely on the removedbankkeeperfield:#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of 'bankkeeper' or 'k.bankkeeper' in the methods rg '(bankkeeper|k\.bankkeeper)' x/evm/keeper/keeper.go
34-44: LGTM: Simplified Keeper initializationThe removal of the
bankkeeperparameter from theNewKeeperfunction aligns with the removal of thebankkeeperfield from theKeeperstruct. This change simplifies theKeeperinitialization and reduces its dependencies.To ensure there are no remaining references to the removed
bankkeeperfield, please run the following command:✅ Verification successful
The
bankkeeperreferences have been successfully removed fromx/evm/keeper/keeper.go. No remaining instances found in the specified file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to 'bankkeeper' in the file rg 'bankkeeper' x/evm/keeper/keeper.goLength of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to 'bankkeeper' in the entire codebase rg 'bankkeeper'Length of output: 1845
x/gov/module.go (1)
93-100: LGTM. Verify consistency with module usage.The removal of the
cdcparameter fromNewAppModuleand its corresponding field inAppModulealigns with the PR objective to remove unused fields. This change simplifies the module initialization.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the removed
cdcfield in theAppModule:✅ Verification successful
Verified: No remaining references to
cdcinx/gov/module.go.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the removed `cdc` field in AppModule # Test: Search for any remaining references to `am.cdc` in the gov module rg 'am\.cdc' x/govLength of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the entire codebase for any references to the removed `cdc` field in `AppModule` # Search for 'cdc' in the context of AppModule across the entire repository rg 'AppModule.*cdc' .Length of output: 6282
x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (3)
43-44: Summary of changes and potential impact.The changes in this file involve removing unused fields (
signerandcrosschain) from thePrecompileTestSuitestruct and commenting out their initializations in theSetupTestmethod. While these changes align with the PR objective of removing unused fields, it's important to ensure that:
- All tests that previously depended on these fields have been updated or removed.
- The removal of these fields doesn't affect the overall functionality of the test suite.
- Any remaining code that might have used these fields has been properly adjusted.
The changes look good, but please double-check the results of the verification scripts in the previous comments to ensure no unintended side effects.
Also applies to: 56-60
43-44: Verify the impact of removingsignerandcrosschainfields.The
signerandcrosschainfields have been commented out. While this aligns with the PR objective of removing unused fields, it's important to ensure that this change doesn't break any existing tests or functionality.Please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of these fields:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'signer' and 'crosschain' fields # Test: Search for usage of 'suite.signer' and 'suite.crosschain' echo "Checking for usage of 'suite.signer':" rg -n 'suite\.signer' x/crosschain/precompile/ echo "Checking for usage of 'suite.crosschain':" rg -n 'suite\.crosschain' x/crosschain/precompile/If any usages are found, please update the corresponding tests or methods to account for the removal of these fields.
56-60: Verify test dependencies and add explanatory comment.The initialization of
signerand deployment of the crosschain contract have been commented out. This is consistent with the removal of the corresponding fields, but it may affect other tests that depend on this setup.Please run the following script to check for any tests that might be affected by these changes:
Consider adding a comment explaining why these initializations have been removed, for example:
// Signer and crosschain contract deployment have been removed as they are no longer used in the test suite. // If you need to reintroduce these, please ensure all related tests are updated accordingly.✅ Verification successful
Please rerun the verification script with the corrected directory path.
Test dependencies verified: No impacts found.
The removal of
signerandcrosschainsetup does not impact any existing tests.Consider adding a comment explaining why these initializations have been removed, for example:
// Signer and crosschain contract deployment have been removed as they are no longer used in the test suite. // If you need to reintroduce these, please ensure all related tests are updated accordingly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for tests that might be affected by the removal of signer and crosschain setup # Test: Search for tests using 'suite.signer' or 'suite.crosschain' echo "Checking for tests using 'suite.signer' or 'suite.crosschain':" rg -n -t go '(func \(suite \*PrecompileTestSuite\) Test.*\(\).*(suite\.signer|suite\.crosschain))' x/crosschain/precompile/Length of output: 865
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for tests that might be affected by the removal of signer and crosschain setup # Test: Search for tests using 'suite.signer' or 'suite.crosschain' echo "Checking for tests using 'suite.signer' or 'suite.crosschain':" rg -n -t go '(func \(suite \*PrecompileTestSuite\) Test.*\(\).*(suite\.signer|suite\.crosschain))' x/crosschain/precompile/Length of output: 272
app/modules.go (1)
111-111: LGTM. Verify consistency and update documentation.The removal of the
appCodecparameter fromfxgov.NewAppModulelooks good and aligns with the PR objective of removing unused fields. However, please ensure the following:
- This change is consistent with the
fxgovmodule's current implementation and doesn't break any functionality.- Similar changes have been applied consistently across the codebase where
fxgov.NewAppModuleis used.- Any related documentation or comments referencing the old function signature are updated.
To verify the consistency of this change across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All instances of
fxgov.NewAppModulewithappCodechave been removed.The change is consistent across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of fxgov.NewAppModule with appCodec # Expect: No results, indicating consistent changes across the codebase rg 'fxgov\.NewAppModule\s*\(\s*appCodec'Length of output: 42
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests
These changes improve the overall performance, maintainability, and clarity of the application.