Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix isort-action usage documentation #2297

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jamescurtin
Copy link
Contributor

Fix isort/isort-action#91

The current docs provide the wrong casing for the isort Github Action inputs.

Copy link
Contributor

@kurtmckee kurtmckee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DanielNoord This looks good. It aligns the isort docs with the isort-action implementation.

@DanielNoord
Copy link
Member

It will need to be rebased though.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.12%. Comparing base (78c30dc) to head (b1a063f).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2297   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.12%   99.12%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        3095     3095           
  Branches      787      787           
=======================================
  Hits         3068     3068           
  Misses         15       15           
  Partials       12       12           

@jamescurtin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DanielNoord--thanks for the review. This has been rebased & is ready to merge.

@DanielNoord
Copy link
Member

See PyCQA/meta#64 (comment) I have stopped merging anything.

@staticdev
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @jamescurtin @kurtmckee @DanielNoord

@staticdev staticdev merged commit baf1112 into PyCQA:main Jan 15, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Outdated docs on website
4 participants