fix: #1674

[plun1331]

Summary

Fixes #1674

Information

• This PR fixes an issue.
• This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
• This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
• This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
  examples, ...).

Checklist

• I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
• If code changes were made then they have been tested.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
• If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.

[Lulalaby]

I guess you're doing it right but just for my own mind:
In c# if i have an object which can be null, x.value could fail, is it not like that in python?

[plun1331]

I guess you're doing it right but just for my own mind: In c# if i have an object which can be null, x.value could fail, is it not like that in python?

the message flags should never be none in this scenario as they're defined like so:

flags = MessageFlags.suppress_embeds if suppress else MessageFlags.DEFAULT_VALUE

[Lulalaby]

I see thx

[honzajavorek]

Awesome!