Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CheckMap with control-flow builder nested conditionals (backport #10395) #10397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 6, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #10395 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

The recursion inside the `CheckMap` pass was based on a custom
`DAGCircuit.compose` solution, rather than the more standard
qubit-argument-binding setup we normally use.  This did not pass in the
clbit ordering to the composition, which could cause it to fail to map
nested conditional statements.

Instead, we can just enter each DAG naturally, and use the regular wire
map to access the physical indices being referred to.

(cherry picked from commit 163875e)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2023 16:01
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@jakelishman jakelishman added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog mod: transpiler Issues and PRs related to Transpiler labels Jul 6, 2023
@jakelishman jakelishman added this to the 0.24.2 milestone Jul 6, 2023
@mtreinish mtreinish added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 6, 2023
Merged via the queue into stable/0.24 with commit c0f02c6 Jul 6, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.24/pr-10395 branch July 6, 2023 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog mod: transpiler Issues and PRs related to Transpiler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants