Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix zero-operand gates and instructions (backport #8272) #9034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 29, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #8272 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

* Fix zero-operand gates and instructions

A few checks in different places didn't account for zero-operand gates
being possible.  In most uses, there never would be anything useful
here, but it can occasionally be useful to create a "global-phase"
instruction, especially if this is later going to have controls applied
to it.  This is well-formed within the Qiskit data model; spectator
qubits implicitly undergo the identity, so this corresponds to the
global phase being multiplied by the identity on _all_ qubits.

* Fix controlled-gate qubit-number documentation

* Add ScalarOp test

* Be stricter about allowed num_ctrl_qubits

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit bb93592)
@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team and ikkoham as code owners October 29, 2022 09:27
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

@jakelishman jakelishman added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge labels Oct 29, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit ad6f295 into stable/0.22 Oct 29, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.22/pr-8272 branch October 29, 2022 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants