Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Loom support for quilt.mod.json5 #36

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

Add Loom support for quilt.mod.json5 #36

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

EnnuiL
Copy link
Contributor

@EnnuiL EnnuiL commented Jul 4, 2023

Requires quilt-loader#329, some further testing, and a RFC update; there isn't any easy way to update the specification in order to mention "oh, QMJ5 is fine if internal-only" there, rfcs#83;
But other than that? Everything is going great!

those switch rules aaaaaaaaaaaaa
@EnnuiL
Copy link
Contributor Author

EnnuiL commented Jul 9, 2023

I have done further work on the other areas in order to prevent misuse of QMJ5s; While I feel like the work's complete, I am not completely sure what else needs to be done for Quilt Loom;
Please let me know about your thoughts!

@EnnuiL EnnuiL changed the title Add support for quilt.mod.json5 Add Loom support for quilt.mod.json5 Jul 10, 2023
@TheGlitch76 TheGlitch76 changed the base branch from dev/1.2 to exp/1.3 July 11, 2023 21:52
@TheGlitch76
Copy link
Contributor

I'm merging this in with Loom 1.3.
This isn't a promise that we'll implement this feature in Loader, though! If we decide to not allow json5 QMJs, then I'll just remove this patch.

@TheGlitch76 TheGlitch76 merged commit 60f9ed4 into QuiltMC:exp/1.3 Jul 11, 2023
@EnnuiL
Copy link
Contributor Author

EnnuiL commented Jul 12, 2023

I hope to make the QMJ5 support as seamless and non-problematic as possible

Juuxel added a commit to Juuxel/fabric-loom that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants