dist: added ng_sniffer script #2844
Conversation
|
What exactly did you change and why was it necessary? |
|
I think it's mostly that the syntax for setting channels and activating promiscuous mode has changed in the gnrc stack. |
|
that and also some code simplification and cleanup |
|
Actually, now that I think of it, we could actually merge both scripts. But since the older one is supposed to vanish (fingers crossed), we could save this work. |
| sys.stderr.write('ifconfig 5 set promiscuous 1\n') | ||
| serport.write('ifconfig 5 set raw 1\n') | ||
| serport.write('ifconfig 5 set chan %s\n' % sys.argv[3]) | ||
| serport.write('ifconfig 5 set promiscuous 1\n') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With modifications in RIOT-OS/applications#6 (comment) this is interface 4 now
|
A README, that this is to be used with RIOT-OS/applications#6 would be nice. |
haukepetersen
force-pushed
the
ng_sniffer
branch
2 times, most recently
from
512b25e to
e3b4d30
Compare
|
updated the script to the new semantics of the |
|
@OlegHahm, @authmillenon, should I squash? |
|
|
||
| ## About | ||
|
|
||
| This sniffer application can be used to sniff network traffic using RIOT based |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not the application, but a script to use the application ;-)
|
@authmillenon: how about this description of the scripts parameters? |
| ``` | ||
| $ ./ng_sniffer.py <tty> <baudrate> <channel> [outfile] | ||
| ``` | ||
| The script needs the following parameters: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"has" instead of "needs". outfile seems to be optional.
|
ACK, please squash. |
|
squashed. |
miri64
added
the
CI: ready for build
|
Waiting for travis |
|
Static tests are passing, the others should not be touched by this: Go. |
I rewrote the sniffer script a little bit to work with the new network stack.
The script works together with the application proposed in RIOT-OS/applications#6