Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add logging functionality to evals/Pandoc.brew #124

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jun 26, 2015
Merged

add logging functionality to evals/Pandoc.brew #124

merged 14 commits into from
Jun 26, 2015

Conversation

daroczig
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@daroczig
Copy link
Member Author

@RomanTsegelskyi, have you seen this? What do you think? Any further ideas on what could be logged? I'd love to merge this as well in the near future (~before next CRAN release) with some extra test coverage.

@romantseg
Copy link
Contributor

@daroczig I will definitely look into in the nearest future when I will write more tests for evals

@daroczig
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks a lot! Please note that evals is another mammoth, just like pandoc.table -- with some really tricky parts (like caching or injecting updated versions of the base graphics functions for unified plots). Let me know if you need any help here.

@romantseg
Copy link
Contributor

@daroczig I looked through the code, add a bit more logging. I feel that this can be merged and then I will get into more refactoring of evals. What do you think?

@daroczig
Copy link
Member Author

Cool! It's seems to be safe to merge, there was an issue previously with zatonovo/futile.logger#27 -- it's live on CRAN now.

Now that you have looked through the source code of evals, any plans on refactoring? The most of the code base was written ~2-3 years ago, so I suspect some funny things lurking there, although I remember I was pretty proud of the features at that time :)

Let me know what you think.

daroczig added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2015
add logging functionality to evals/Pandoc.brew
@daroczig daroczig merged commit cc0f564 into master Jun 26, 2015
@romantseg
Copy link
Contributor

I definitely want to refactor some parts, I just wanted to merge the pull request first, not to have conflicts. In general I plan to spend next days (probably until end of next week) to do refactoring where I can, try to get everything under consistent style, maybe write more tests after I add braces to all the if statements and fix 2 remaining issues. And after that I think we will have a package ready for a new release and I will move to working on new S3 methods/vignettes and more feature.

@daroczig
Copy link
Member Author

Great, let me know if you need any help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants