-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spacy_sklearn and Mitie_sklearn #440
Comments
For now, I just use dummy training data that I create from API.AI. my project will use at max 10 data training each intents (there's will be 100 intents), and 10 data for each entities (there's will be aroung 20 entities). |
To quote @tmbo :
|
Thanks @PHLF , Yeah I've read that tmbo quotes. Thanks, |
If your pipeline doesn't work well enough for your use case try either to increase your dataset (which is currently too small) or test with another pipeline. Try also to define syntactically distinct intents and entities. |
Thanks for your advice @PHLF , Thanks, |
@andikas Did you choose spaCy or mitie for your training, finally? I'm facing the same problem here, not getting good confidence levels for spacy. Wondering if I should switch to mitie or add more examples. |
Hi all,
reffering to this isseu:
#164
I want to clear about which one is better between spacy_sklearn and mitie_sklearn.
I have an example data that I have exported it before from api.ai.
my data consist of 2 entities and 4 intents.
I train the data with those 2 and return 2 different models.
entities:
1: greetings: hello, -> synonims: hello, hi
2. nutrients:
different respond with same text.
we can see the entities sometimes not detected, even protein and carbohidrate in the same entities.
and here's the impact. it goes to other intents because there's no entities detected.
it goes to other intent (bot info intent) -> refering to 'what is your name'
so which one is better?
I'll use about 100 intents and 30 entities.
please help me decide.
and do spacy sklearn didn't return entities?
Thanks,
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: