You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my case Mittie results are more accurate but it's taking too long time to train data (24 hours type), where as spaCy + scikit-learn train the data in less than a minute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is expected. The underlying libraries use different models for entity recognition.
For the spacy backend a suggested amount of training data per entity is around 5000 samples (see explosion/spaCy#773). Hence it might very well be that spacy is faster but bad and mitie is slow but might perform better on your data.
* do not unpack json payload if data key is not present
* add room arg to else branch
* prepared release of version 3.7.3.dev1 (#151)
* Prepare-release-3.7.3.dev2 (#164)
* prepared release of version 3.7.3.dev2
* allow dev releases without changelogs
* add changelog entry
---------
Co-authored-by: Shailendra Paliwal <hello@shailendra.me>
I am getting two different result when data is trained using Mittie and spaCy + scikit-learn
Response of Mittie trained data
Response of spaCy + scikit-learn trained data
In my case Mittie results are more accurate but it's taking too long time to train data (24 hours type), where as spaCy + scikit-learn train the data in less than a minute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: