Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

some transactions showing as conflicted #177

Closed
underdarkskies opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

some transactions showing as conflicted #177

underdarkskies opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@underdarkskies
Copy link
Collaborator

After attempting to send multiple units of a single asset to different addresses, I recieved transaction conflicted notifications in the qt gui.
image

After runnning gettransaction from the console on an affected transaction i recieved



{
  "amount": 0.00000000,
  "fee": -0.00005251,
  "confirmations": -28,
  "trusted": false,
  "txid": "f34a0c87d006b603479cf0601ed426c27fcc8ebe319db0914cf53b070b879e08",
  "walletconflicts": [
    "1fd429d577645dfc68b2f6300e377b68275970d4e44305885ee629515f3d9f1f",
    "644162d4d929b6fa6862a487748ebacaaafe04cf3cfa50d02f965f8860e46938",
    "a53a514993bbd61a6dab166baa645094486eb520a3bf3a67778838dc96ea4072",
    "4c4e15325e31d964be7c95fa0628918c601d89a8e0ddf19222b9478b2624ce7f",
    "9235b386eb3aea648fc8aefa41f4c08d2bb67122bab2d33839bc8a6ff5a744ae"
  ],
  "time": 1533148924,
  "timereceived": 1533148924,
  "bip125-replaceable": "unknown",
  "details": [
  ],
  "asset_details": [
    {
      "asset_type": "transfer_asset",
      "asset_name": "UNDER",
      "amount": 5.00000000,
      "destination": "mm2tgEKBgrewVeBuE9krtTKhWyXLyp2HwY",
      "vout": 0,
      "category": "send"
    }
  ],
  "hex": "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"
}
@underdarkskies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

so it looks like for the raven fee, the same UTXO was used to build the transactions

{
  "txid": "9235b386eb3aea648fc8aefa41f4c08d2bb67122bab2d33839bc8a6ff5a744ae",
  "hash": "9235b386eb3aea648fc8aefa41f4c08d2bb67122bab2d33839bc8a6ff5a744ae",
  "version": 2,
  "size": 450,
  "vsize": 450,
  "locktime": 340772,
  "vin": [
    {
      "txid": "754f0bf09ad58cdfc263e92b4901ef4659ea029c39d3e761ed5a447fff7dd256",
      "vout": 0,
      "scriptSig": {
        "asm": "3045022100f259b1fa6ed503dc84a993353cbe4ab0fef80859ac698eeff10fa94218ad3fe4022048d89f94bd1090fb5d3d934e461ace177678c74d29c54d8bd71879460b6c5e0c[ALL] 0232cef3b65ac9bec17609fe13fd84cb848d69b20932eb9328547c83ddd76cc4cb",
        "hex": "483045022100f259b1fa6ed503dc84a993353cbe4ab0fef80859ac698eeff10fa94218ad3fe4022048d89f94bd1090fb5d3d934e461ace177678c74d29c54d8bd71879460b6c5e0c01210232cef3b65ac9bec17609fe13fd84cb848d69b20932eb9328547c83ddd76cc4cb"
      },
      "sequence": 4294967294
    },
    {
      "txid": "754f0bf09ad58cdfc263e92b4901ef4659ea029c39d3e761ed5a447fff7dd256",
      "vout": 3,
      "scriptSig": {
        "asm": "3045022100c47a0ddcabe05ee7f1d25e5238b60f59b1142ac744a66c7205065ade6ffe6d5002200a3ea71fe04451c52d576a03cdb32bfc7d85ad25ad3d787f9300f316316f9db5[ALL] 020954d2637a262cca474f381a896c10bae3615861fc471aff56d47ddc7adadf3d",
        "hex": "483045022100c47a0ddcabe05ee7f1d25e5238b60f59b1142ac744a66c7205065ade6ffe6d5002200a3ea71fe04451c52d576a03cdb32bfc7d85ad25ad3d787f9300f316316f9db50121020954d2637a262cca474f381a896c10bae3615861fc471aff56d47ddc7adadf3d"
      },
      "sequence": 4294967294
    }
  ],
  "vout": [
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 0,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 01a6ea8cc369ebdfc225cf55358c41e2298e2835 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG OP_RVN_ASSET 72766e7405554e4445520065cd1d00000000 OP_DROP",
        "hex": "76a91401a6ea8cc369ebdfc225cf55358c41e2298e283588acc01272766e7405554e4445520065cd1d0000000075",
        "reqSigs": 1,
        "type": "transfer_asset",
        "addresses": [
          "mffgvndHwHsjGDReAawf4WWRjVbgv9dZbR"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "value": 0.00000000,
      "n": 1,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b88e49e078b7a999d9a5918247d7b64fd735ce96 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG OP_RVN_ASSET 72766e7405554e444552000f6e860b000000 OP_DROP",
        "hex": "76a914b88e49e078b7a999d9a5918247d7b64fd735ce9688acc01272766e7405554e444552000f6e860b00000075",
        "reqSigs": 1,
        "type": "transfer_asset",
        "addresses": [
          "mxLo5ja33rpHxVQaCANC4vAnWy4j1BN8qf"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "value": 2284.99979049,
      "n": 2,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b88e49e078b7a999d9a5918247d7b64fd735ce96 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
        "hex": "76a914b88e49e078b7a999d9a5918247d7b64fd735ce9688ac",
        "reqSigs": 1,
        "type": "pubkeyhash",
        "addresses": [
          "mxLo5ja33rpHxVQaCANC4vAnWy4j1BN8qf"
        ]
      }
    }
  ]
}

@underdarkskies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

not sure if this is intended, maybe i chalk it up to issuing to many transactions, but still its wierd

@underdarkskies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

underdarkskies commented Aug 1, 2018

yea so this is reproduceable, if you fire off multiple sends before one of them is confirmed, then you will get conflicted transactions in your wallet

@TronBlack
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you. We'll get this fixed.

@blondfrogs
Copy link
Contributor

@underdarkskies This should be fixed now with #237

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants