refactor(dateHelper): swatch-260 remove moment.js from dateHelper

[vbusch]

What's included

sw-260 Replace moment.js

Notes

Removed moment.js from the date helper. This is a non functional change. There should be no noticeable UI differences.
TODO: remove it from the other files.

How to test

Coverage and basic unit test check

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn test
3. confirm tests come back clean

Proxy run check

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. make sure Docker is running, plus on network, then
3. $ yarn start:proxy
4. http://localhost:3000/apps/subscriptions/rhel
5. change the time range for the cpu socket usage. And verify the network request has the correct range.

Check the build

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn build
3. confirm tests come back clean

Updates issue/story

sw-260

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1220 (00ab2ba) into main (d46fab0) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 91.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1220      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.16%   92.21%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         122      122              
  Lines        4251     4264      +13     
  Branches     1786     1790       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         3918     3932      +14     
+ Misses        314      312       -2     
- Partials       19       20       +1     

Files	Coverage Δ
src/common/dateHelpers.js	93.05% <91.66%> (+3.22%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d46fab0...00ab2ba. Read the comment docs.

[mirekdlugosz]

@vbusch if you have access to iqe-curiosity-plugin on internal GitLab, please take a look at iqe_curiosity/tests/unittests_utils.py. There's a number of unit tests that cover cases that I have seen failing over the years. I think it might be good idea to add at least some of them to unit tests here, to ensure this change is backwards compatible.

@diegomaranhao can help you with accessing these tests, and is up to date with whether they are still running or not.

[cdcabrera]

All minor stuff, mostly copy. Looks good at the functional level!

[cdcabrera]

minor parameter adjustment

[cdcabrera]

lgtm!

stepped through the combinations against data in staging, ranges appear to maintain the original ranges for standard granularity (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly), and the additional "ranged granularity" we use for on-demand displays

@vbusch this is an approval without being a github approval, reason, before we merge this update, reviewing a sync between envs for variant work