feat: add missing files #76
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@Renato66 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe project has been enhanced with configuration for GitHub funding, improved code quality through linting and formatting, and optimized workflows for checks and caching. Additionally, guidelines for contributors, licensing information, and a refined README for better clarity and usage instructions have been introduced. These changes aim to streamline development practices, encourage community support, and ensure consistent code standards. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockbis excluded by!bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/FUNDING.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/checks.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
- .prettierrc.json (1 hunks)
- .vscode/extensions.json (1 hunks)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
- LICENSE (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/domain/labelsNotAllowed.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scraper/text.ts (1 hunks)
- src/service/github.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .prettierrc.json
- .vscode/extensions.json
- LICENSE
Additional comments not posted (12)
.github/FUNDING.yml (1)
1-1: LGTM!.github/workflows/checks.yml (3)
1-1: Renaming the workflow to "Checks" is a good practice as it encompasses more than just unit tests.
20-20: Adding a linting step before tests is a great addition for maintaining code quality.
1-4: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-20]
Ensure the workflow runs successfully after these changes.
package.json (2)
6-14: Adding scripts for testing, coverage, and tslint enhances development practices. Including TypeScript as a devDependency is necessary for type-checking and linting.
14-14: Ensure the TypeScript version is compatible with the project's requirements.CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
1-30: The instructions for usingbunandDockerare clear and provide valuable guidance for setting up the development environment..github/workflows/codecov.yml (1)
16-21: Adding caching for the~/.bundirectory is a good optimization that will speed up the workflow execution.src/service/github.ts (1)
1-28: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-37]
Updating the syntax for defining variables and removing unnecessary semicolons are good practices. Simplifying the code structure improves readability and maintainability. Consider adding type annotations for better type safety.
src/scraper/text.ts (2)
3-3: Simplifying theescapeRegExpfunction's type declaration improves clarity.
7-7: Modifying thecompareLabelsfunction's return type declaration enhances consistency.README.md (1)
43-49: Remove unnecessary repeated whitespaces in the table for better readability.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
README.md (12)
1-1: Rename the project to "Auto-label" for consistency and branding.
3-5: Add badges for unit tests, labeling new issues, and code coverage to enhance the project's visibility and credibility.
11-12: Clarify the warning about the main branch being refactored and guide users towards the stable version.
21-39: Provide detailed instructions for adding a YAML file to.github/workflows/issue.ymlfor issue labeling. Ensure the YAML syntax is correct and the example is clear.
51-57: Ensure the repo token instructions are clear and concise, guiding users on how to use GitHub secrets effectively.
59-71: Provide guidance on changing the bot's appearance by using a user token, ensuring the instructions are clear and the images are relevant.
73-77: Clarify the option to ignore comments within issues and the implications of setting it to false.
79-88: Explain the use of scoped blocks for labeling specific parts of issues or PRs, ensuring the example is clear.
91-97: Address the possible spelling mistake in "Labels Synonyms" section and ensure the example provided is clear and understandable.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that "C: VCombobox" is intentionally used in the project's README.md as an example for setting label synonyms. This suggests that the label is valid within the context provided by the documentation. No further action or correction regarding this label is necessary.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if "C: VCombobox" is a valid label or if it should be corrected. echo "Check project documentation or label configuration for 'C: VCombobox' to ensure correctness."Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the project documentation for any mention of "C: VCombobox" rg "C: VCombobox" # Assuming the project uses a common configuration file for labels, search for it as well # This is a hypothetical command; the actual command may vary based on the project's structure rg "labels" --files | xargs rg "C: VCombobox"Length of output: 706
99-104: Ensure the "Labels Not Allowed" section clearly lists labels that are restricted and the instructions are easy to follow.
107-113: Clarify the "Default Labels" section to ensure it's clear which labels will always be set for new or updated issues.
115-126: Guide users on how to add a badge to their repository, ensuring the instructions are clear and the example is correct.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
No description provided.