Feat/json config #80
Feat/json config #80
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@Renato66 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent changes encompass a shift to JSON5 for managing GitHub Actions inputs, particularly for automating issue labeling. This involves introducing a new configuration file format, updating the workflow for automatic issue labeling, and enhancing domain logic to handle label configurations based on this new format. The addition of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockbis excluded by!bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.json5 (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getJsonFile.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.json5
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml
Additional comments not posted (5)
package.json (1)
24-25: The addition ofjson5as a dependency aligns with the project's transition to JSON5 for configuration. The version constraint "^2.2.3" is appropriate for receiving updates while maintaining compatibility.src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (3)
2-2: The import ofgetLabelConfigsfrom./getJsonFileis correctly added to support the new JSON5 configuration handling.
4-9: The expandedConfigtype definition appropriately includes new fields such aslabelsNotAllowed,defaultLabels,labelsSynonyms, andignoreComments, aligning with the new JSON5 configuration requirements.
11-28: The modifications togetConfigFilefunction correctly integrate the new JSON5 configuration handling. The use ofgetLabelConfigsto fetch configurations is appropriate and aligns with the transition to JSON5.src/domain/getJsonFile.ts (1)
6-24: The implementation ofgetLabelConfigsfunction is robust, correctly checking for file existence before reading, and using JSON5 for parsing. The error handling usingcore.warningis appropriate for actions, providing feedback without failing the workflow unnecessarily.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml (1 hunks)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getJsonFile.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .prettierignore
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
build failure (5)
src/domain/getJsonFile.ts: [failure] 8-8: TypeError: path must be a string or a file descriptor
at getLabelConfigs (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getJsonFile.ts:8:23) at getConfigFile (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getConfigFile.ts:23:18) at /home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/runner.ts:20:7 at run (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/runner.ts:10:26) at /home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/runner.spec.ts:38:11 at /home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/runner.spec.ts:37:41
src/domain/getJsonFile.ts: [failure] 8-8: TypeError: path must be a string or a file descriptor
at getLabelConfigs (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getJsonFile.ts:8:23) at getConfigFile (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getConfigFile.ts:23:18) at /home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getConfigFile.spec.ts:14:21
src/domain/getJsonFile.ts: [failure] 8-8: ENOENT: No such file or directory
at getLabelConfigs (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getJsonFile.ts:8:23) at getConfigFile (/home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getConfigFile.ts:23:18) at /home/runner/work/auto-label/auto-label/src/domain/getConfigFile.spec.ts:28:20
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/domain/getJsonFile.ts (1)
8-8: Ensure the file path is correctly handled when reading the file.This script checks all usages of
getLabelConfigsto ensure that the path argument passed is always a valid string, addressing the type error reported by the static analysis tool.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the file path (
configPath) used infs.readFileSyncwithingetLabelConfigsis correctly handled as a string. This is ensured by the use ofgetInput<string>insrc/domain/getConfigFile.ts, which explicitly defines the type ofconfigPathas a string. Therefore, the concerns raised in the review comment are addressed.
- File and Line:
src/domain/getConfigFile.ts, line wheregetInput<string>is called forconfigPath.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the file path passed to `fs.readFileSync` is always a valid string. # Test: Search for all usages of `getLabelConfigs` to ensure the path argument is always a string. rg --type typescript $'getLabelConfigs\\('Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the file path passed to `fs.readFileSync` is always a valid string. # Corrected Test: Search for all usages of `getLabelConfigs` to ensure the path argument is always a string. rg --type ts $'getLabelConfigs\\('Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition and usage of `configPath` in `src/domain/getConfigFile.ts`. # Extract lines around the usage of `configPath`. rg --type ts --context 5 'configPath' src/domain/getConfigFile.tsLength of output: 701
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.json5 (1 hunks)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/config.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/config.json5 (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/config.jsonc (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/empty.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid1.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid2.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid3.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/valid/valid.json (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getInput.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/runner.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- src/mock/config/config.json
- src/mock/config/config.json5
- src/mock/config/config.jsonc
- src/mock/config/empty.json
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid1.json
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid2.json
- src/mock/config/invalid/invalid3.json
- src/mock/config/valid/valid.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.json5
- .prettierignore
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/runner.spec.ts (1)
38-47: The changes to the mock setup forgetInputare correctly implemented to provide specific responses based on the input.src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts (1)
1-55: The test cases added forgetLabelConfigsfunction are comprehensive and well-structured, covering both valid and invalid scenarios effectively.src/domain/getConfigFile.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-46: The changes to the mock setup forgetInputare correctly implemented to provide specific responses based on the input, facilitating accurate testing of thegetConfigFilefunction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
Line range hint
142-142: Add the missing closing bracket]for proper markdown formatting.- thanks to [@dielduarte](https://github.com/dielduarte) and [@PauloGoncalvesBH](https://github.com/Pa... + thanks to [@dielduarte](https://github.com/dielduarte) and [@PauloGoncalvesBH](https://github.com/PauloGoncalvesBH)]
Line range hint
71-71: Specify the language for the fenced code block to enable proper syntax highlighting.- ``` + ```yml
Line range hint
135-135: Specify the language for the fenced code block to enable proper syntax highlighting.- ``` + ```json
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- src/mock/config/auto-label.json (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/auto-label.json5 (1 hunks)
- src/mock/config/auto-label.jsonc (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/mock/config/auto-label.json
- src/mock/config/auto-label.json5
- src/mock/config/auto-label.jsonc
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .github/workflows/auto-label.yml
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (4)
README.md (4)
Near line 97: The word “checkout” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ...ore your configuration file, you should checkout and point withconfiguration-fileinp...
Near line 142: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing
Context: ...rte](https://github.com/dielduarte) and [@PauloGoncalvesBH](https://github.com/Pa...
Near line 146: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym here.
Context: ...a label likeC: VComboboxit would be hard to match the label in a normal issue, b...
Near line 154: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...wed Some labels are restricted to repo owners such asneeds prioritytesting`won...
Additional comments not posted (3)
README.md (3)
12-12: Ensure the workflow fileauto-label.ymlis correctly placed and configured as per the new JSON5 settings.
23-28: The checkout action uses version 4, which is the latest major version. Ensure that all features used here are compatible with this version.
33-53: The JSON5 configuration file is well-formed and includes necessary settings. Ensure that the file is correctly parsed by the application.Verification successful
The test file
src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.tsincludes tests that verify the parsing of theauto-label.json5configuration file. The tests check if the functiongetLabelConfigscan correctly read and parse the configuration from the specified path, and they compare the result against a predefineddefaultConfig. The tests cover scenarios where the configuration is valid, invalid, and unreadable, ensuring that the function behaves as expected in different situations.Given this information, it appears that the application does include logic to parse the
auto-label.json5file and that this functionality is covered by automated tests. This aligns with the review comment's request to ensure that the file is correctly parsed by the application.Final Response:
The application includes automated tests to verify the parsing of the
auto-label.json5configuration file, as seen insrc/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts. These tests confirm that the application can correctly parse and apply settings from this file.
- Test File:
src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.tsScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify parsing of `auto-label.json5`. # Test: Check if the application correctly parses `auto-label.json5` and applies settings. echo "Please manually verify that the application correctly parses and applies settings from `auto-label.json5`."Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if `auto-label.json5` exists in the repository fd auto-label.json5 # Search for code snippets that might be parsing `auto-label.json5` rg "auto-label.json5" --files-with-matchesLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the content of the file that likely contains logic for parsing `auto-label.json5` cat src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.tsLength of output: 1779
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .prettierignore
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.spec.ts
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
closes #79