-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BRAT-cIS (Capacity Inference System) #35
Comments
Do we want to ask whether or not this is an assessment of 'existing capacity' or 'potential capacity'? This becomes an attribute field... and those are the options. |
Okay... Weber, check out #42 for forms (one basic, one advanced) |
Note.... progress was tracked on #42 @webernick79 Please post link to finished BRAT_cIS Basic & BRAT_cIS Advanced when done here. |
Read me |
@joewheaton and @wally-mac and @bangen OK, I think this is where I'm supposed to be posting related to BRAT field inference forms. Here is a link to the BRAT Field Assessment Form - Advanced If I understand this correctly, this is also the form that Wally and Sara will be using for validation during their Truckee field visits. At this point I don't think it's worth developing additional ESRI mobile functionality for the Truckee validation visits. I'm guessing you guys will also have iPads with GISkit that you will primarily be relying on. However, I am open to putting together a map in Arc Explorer or something like that as well. I'll give this form a good going over tomorrow and continue to work out the kinks. |
Thanks a ton @webernick79 for this! I've tested the form on both a browser (desktop) and Survey123 (Android). Everything looks great. I think we should run with this for now and hold-off on tweaks until after we've used it in a real setting. Really nice job. Very useful. I'm closing this as I think its done. Any new feature requests or tweaks can refer back to this, but should just be there own tickets. |
THanks @joewheaton Yes, close things up and let's start new issues for additions. Also, I do like using Git for tracking this stuff. Like any piece of software it just takes a bit to pick it up. |
Thanks @webernick79 for this! I've tested the form on both a browser (desktop) and Survey123 (iPhone). Everything looks and works great. Excellent job! |
This is from #29
What it is:
I think we need to build out what we'll call the BRAT-cIS (capacity inference system) and distinguish that from the 'model' of BRAT-cFIS (capacity fuzzy inference system). This is nothing more than the combination of the two inference systems that comprise the capacity model of BRAT from the Macfarlane et al. (2015). What is different is we don't make the inference system fuzzy, and just run it from the two rule tables based on categorical inputs from the user. The first assesses capacity solely on vegetation next to stream, vs. within a 100 m of stream (on either side... but could break into river right and river left):
This output is analagous to BRAT's
oVC_EX
output.The second takes that output, and feeds it in with a few other questions:
Unlike the FIS, the output of IS NOT a continuous number (in dams/km) but rather a category of Maximum Dam Density:
This output is analagous to BRAT's
oCC_EX
output but is actually directly comparable to theEx_Category
output.The Specific Request
I think one of the Data Capture Apps (probably a ArcSurvey123) would be similar to what Nick has already made (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26rqpWeay-o) but is set up so it can be run either from Desktop or Field (i.e. #31), so that the call could be based on field data or desktop call. We just need to know who is making the call, where they are making it, and what evidence they are basing it off of.
The User Inputs
The first part should be called the 'Vegetation to Support Beaver Dam Building'. Right now it looks like:
That's pretty much there...
The second part brings in the 'Combined Capacity to Support Dam Building'. Here we need the following questions:
What empirical evidence exists of this at that location:
This stuff needs to expand the lower part of @webernick79's mock form
Some additional contextual component should be:
Streamflow
If 'Intermittent' - also get 'Proximity to Perennial Water Source'
>
5 km1 - 5 km
< 1 km
Channel Setting
Current Activity
The Output
idc
prefixes (for input data capture instead ofi
for inputs to model) and outputs havingodc
prefix.Analyses it Could Support
We'll need to work with @banderson1618 and @bangen on these. A few that come to mind:
odc_cIS
toEx_Category
, on a reach by reach basis and having a map output with categories of:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: