-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] - Inform when there is no minor version #668
Draft
Ferror
wants to merge
3
commits into
Roave:8.0.x
Choose a base branch
from
Ferror:patch-1
base: 8.0.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
<?php | ||
|
||
declare(strict_types=1); | ||
|
||
namespace Roave\BackwardCompatibility\VersionConstraint; | ||
|
||
use Version\Comparison\Constraint\Constraint; | ||
use Version\Version; | ||
|
||
final class StableVersionConstraint implements Constraint | ||
{ | ||
public function assert(Version $version): bool | ||
{ | ||
return ! $version->isPreRelease(); | ||
} | ||
} |
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions
24
test/unit/VersionConstraint/StableVersionConstraintTest.php
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
<?php | ||
|
||
declare(strict_types=1); | ||
|
||
namespace RoaveTest\BackwardCompatibility\VersionConstraint; | ||
|
||
use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase; | ||
use Roave\BackwardCompatibility\VersionConstraint\StableVersionConstraint; | ||
use Version\Version; | ||
|
||
final class StableVersionConstraintTest extends TestCase | ||
{ | ||
public function testStableVersions(): void | ||
{ | ||
$constraint = new StableVersionConstraint(); | ||
|
||
self::assertTrue($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('1.0.0'))); | ||
self::assertTrue($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('0.1.0'))); | ||
self::assertTrue($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('0.0.1'))); | ||
self::assertFalse($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('1.0.0-alpha.1'))); | ||
self::assertFalse($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('1.0.0-beta.1'))); | ||
self::assertFalse($constraint->assert(Version::fromString('1.0.0-rc.1'))); | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just realized another problem, sorry @_@
Assume somebody incorrectly installs this tool with a CI setup that did not pull tags during clone operations (shallow clone: default on github), this leads to an exit code zero by default, hiding the underlying problem.
Perhaps an exception or non-zero exit code was really the best approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, maybe we can kill two birds with one stone. One is a misconfiguration which we could verify and the second is an exception :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do we verify it, if no
git fetch
has occurred? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't that...
No tags -> possible misconfiguration so we can throw an exception. Like. THERE ARE NO TAGS. WE NEED THEM (yes, we gonna scream 😄)
Then at some point, we can assume that there are at least some tags (we verified that by the previous action), but we want to check out the stable ones. There are tags, but none of them are stable. Return success.
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me - indeed the tool cannot do auto-
--from=
without tags.Good enough :-)