Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance tuning for onObject zts producer #2171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Performance tuning for onObject zts producer #2171

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

RobinTail
Copy link
Owner

@RobinTail RobinTail commented Nov 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Discovered during #2168
wrong

@RobinTail RobinTail added the refactoring The better way to achieve the same result label Nov 15, 2024
@RobinTail RobinTail added this to the v21 milestone Nov 15, 2024
@RobinTail RobinTail mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Merged
@RobinTail RobinTail marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2024 12:24
@coveralls-official Coveralls Official
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 100.0%. remained the same
when pulling d8c6458 on tune-zts-onObject
into bc8e9eb on make-v21.

@RobinTail RobinTail merged commit 9f1e0bf into make-v21 Nov 15, 2024
11 checks passed
@RobinTail RobinTail deleted the tune-zts-onObject branch November 15, 2024 12:28
RobinTail added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
@RobinTail
Revert "Performance tuning for onObject zts producer (#2171)"
6d6e330 
This reverts commit 9f1e0bf.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
refactoring The better way to achieve the same result
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v21
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@RobinTail