`.eh_frame` section emitted for `kernel.o` (debug assertions enabled, `rustc` >= 1.70.0) #1012

ojeda · 2023-06-09T12:48:44Z

ld.lld: warning <internal>:(.eh_frame) is being placed in ‘.eh_frame’

Being resolved in Rust's side: rust-lang/rust#112403.
See: #355.

ojeda · 2023-06-16T01:58:52Z

Fixed in Rust 1.72.0.

ojeda · 2023-06-20T20:16:44Z

I tested the current nightly (rustc 1.72.0-nightly (fe7454bf4 2023-06-19)), and I confirm it is fixed -- thanks again @nbdd0121!

However, I noticed that this also triggers in the rust branch for samples/rust/rust_echo_server.rs: #1016. I assume due to something related to the async usage, i.e. the one that Wedson noticed back then (and it is still there in the current nightly, unlike this one, since I tested it anyhow).

(I will close this one when we land 1.72.0 in mainline)

This includes disabling debug assertions due to the `eh_frame` issue [1]. They can be re-enabled in Rust 1.72.0. This also disables handling dependency info since it is not generated anymore. Link: Rust-for-Linux#1012 [1] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

Due to the `eh_frame` issue [1]. They may be re-enabled in Rust 1.72.0. Link: Rust-for-Linux#1012 [1] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

This is the second upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.0 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). # Unstable features No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. # Other improvements Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug in our old `rust` branch [4]. Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. # Required changes For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1720-2023-08-24 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: Rust-for-Linux#2 [3] Closes: Rust-for-Linux#1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

This is the second upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.0 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). # Unstable features No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. # Other improvements Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug in our old `rust` branch [4]. Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. # Required changes For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1720-2023-08-24 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: #2 [3] Closes: #1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org

This is the second upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.0 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). # Unstable features No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. # Other improvements Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug in our old `rust` branch [4]. Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. # Required changes For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1720-2023-08-24 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: Rust-for-Linux/linux#2 [3] Closes: Rust-for-Linux/linux#1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org

This is the third upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.1 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). # Unstable features No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. # Other improvements Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug when debug assertions were enabled (`CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) [4]: LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1 ld.lld: error: <internal>:(.eh_frame) is being placed in '.eh_frame' Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. # Required changes For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1721-2023-09-19 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: #2 [3] Closes: #1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org [ Used 1.72.1 instead of .0 (no changes in `alloc`) and reworded to mention that we hit the `.eh_frame` bug under debug assertions. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

This is the third upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.1 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug when debug assertions were enabled (`CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) [4]: LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1 ld.lld: error: <internal>:(.eh_frame) is being placed in '.eh_frame' Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1721-2023-09-19 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: Rust-for-Linux/linux#2 [3] Closes: Rust-for-Linux/linux#1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org [ Used 1.72.1 instead of .0 (no changes in `alloc`) and reworded to mention that we hit the `.eh_frame` bug under debug assertions. ] Change-Id: Ie17c06d483a356708fdf62fa954a2dde1932526d Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com> (cherry picked from commit ae6df65dabc3f8bd89663d96203963323e266d90)

commit ae6df65 upstream. This is the third upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.1 (i.e. the latest) [1]. See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2"). # Unstable features No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized. Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be upstreamed may increase the list. Please see [3] for details. # Other improvements Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame` section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug when debug assertions were enabled (`CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) [4]: LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1 ld.lld: error: <internal>:(.eh_frame) is being placed in '.eh_frame' Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5]. # Required changes For the upgrade, the following changes are required: - A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details. # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded at once. There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer infallible APIs coming from upstream. Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only, especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream. Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot potentially unintended changes to our additions. To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after applying this patch: # Get the difference with respect to the old version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc # Apply this patch. git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch # Get the difference with respect to the new version. git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc) git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc | cut -d/ -f3- | grep -Fv README.md | xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch git -C linux restore rust/alloc Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1721-2023-09-19 [1] Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2] Link: Rust-for-Linux/linux#2 [3] Closes: Rust-for-Linux/linux#1012 [4] Link: rust-lang/rust#112403 [5] Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org [ Used 1.72.1 instead of .0 (no changes in `alloc`) and reworded to mention that we hit the `.eh_frame` bug under debug assertions. ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

ojeda added the • toolchain Related to `rustc`, `bindgen`, `rustdoc`, LLVM, Clippy... label Jun 9, 2023

ojeda mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2023

rustc wanted features & bugfixes #355

Open

52 tasks

ojeda mentioned this issue Jun 20, 2023

.eh_frame section emitted for rust_echo_server.o #1016

Open

ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2023

CI: disable debug assertions temporarily

73618d3

Due to the `eh_frame` issue [1]. They may be re-enabled in Rust 1.72.0. Link: Rust-for-Linux#1012 [1] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

ojeda closed this as completed in 7aa730f Oct 5, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

`.eh_frame` section emitted for `kernel.o` (debug assertions enabled, `rustc` >= 1.70.0) #1012

`.eh_frame` section emitted for `kernel.o` (debug assertions enabled, `rustc` >= 1.70.0) #1012

ojeda commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

ojeda commented Jun 16, 2023

ojeda commented Jun 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

.eh_frame section emitted for kernel.o (debug assertions enabled, rustc >= 1.70.0) #1012

.eh_frame section emitted for kernel.o (debug assertions enabled, rustc >= 1.70.0) #1012

Comments

ojeda commented Jun 9, 2023 • edited Loading

ojeda commented Jun 16, 2023

ojeda commented Jun 20, 2023 • edited Loading

`.eh_frame` section emitted for `kernel.o` (debug assertions enabled, `rustc` >= 1.70.0) #1012

`.eh_frame` section emitted for `kernel.o` (debug assertions enabled, `rustc` >= 1.70.0) #1012

ojeda commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

ojeda commented Jun 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading