Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update webmock 3.23.1 → 3.24.0 (minor) #1233

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ webmock (3.23.1 → 3.24.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.24.0 (from changelog)

  • Ignore parsing errors when parsing invalid JSON or XML body to match against body pattern #1066

    Thanks to Christian Schmidt

  • Added support for mocked HTTP::Connection#finished_request? method #1065

    Thanks to Christian Schmidt

  • Detect if Patron is loaded by checking if Patron::Session constant is defined #1068

    Thanks to Rodrigo Argumedo

  • Raising an ArgumentError when uri is passed as a Pathname object to stub_request or request expectation declaration.

  • Dropped support for em-http-request on Ruby 3.4. The current version of em-http-request (1.1.7) is incompatible with Ruby 3.4 due to an unresolved issue (igrigorik/em-http-request#365). Support for em-http-request will be re-enabled once the compatibility issue is resolved.

    Thanks to Christian Schmidt

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 26 commits:

↗️ addressable (indirect, 2.8.6 → 2.8.7) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.8.7 (from changelog)

  • Allow public_suffix 6 (#535)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

↗️ hashdiff (indirect, 1.1.0 → 1.1.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.1.1 (from changelog)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 14 commits:

↗️ rexml (indirect, 3.3.6 → 3.3.8) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.3.8

Improvements

  • SAX2: Improve parse performance.

Fixes

  • Fixed a bug that unexpected attribute namespace conflict error for
    the predefined "xml" namespace is reported.
    • GH-208
    • Patch by KITAITI Makoto

Thanks

  • NAITOH Jun

  • KITAITI Makoto

3.3.7

Improvements

  • Added local entity expansion limit methods

    • GH-192
    • GH-202
    • Reported by takuya kodama.
    • Patch by NAITOH Jun.
  • Removed explicit strscan dependency

    • GH-204
    • Patch by Bo Anderson.

Thanks

  • takuya kodama

  • NAITOH Jun

  • Bo Anderson

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 11 commits:

🗑️ strscan (removed)


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Oct 1, 2024
@digitaltom digitaltom merged commit 0b3d258 into master Nov 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@digitaltom digitaltom deleted the depfu/update/webmock-3.24.0 branch November 5, 2024 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant