Skip to content

SaltyAom/bun-http-framework-benchmark

Repository files navigation

Bun HTTP Framework Benchmark

Compare throughput benchmarks from various JavaScript HTTP framework

Test method: Average throughput

  1. Ping
    • Request to [GET] /
    • Return hi
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: text/plain, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  2. Query
    • Request to [GET] /id/:id
    • Extract path parameter, query string and setting headers.
    • For this benchmark, the request URL will be send as: /id/1?name=bun
    • Headers must contains x-powered-by to benchmark
    • Expected response: "1 bun" (${id} ${query})
      • You MUST NOT use hardcode string or index to extract querystring.
      • In a real-world situation, there's no enforcement that the request will follow the specification, using hardcode index to extract name=bun querystring will be prone to error.
      • To test if it pass the requirement, the implementation should be able to extract querystring dynamically (please treat the value of 'name=bun' can be any value beside 'bun', for example 'alice', 'hina'), which means that the same code should be able to extract querystring, for example:
      • /id/1?name=bun&id=1 -> should return 1 bun not 1 bun&id=1
      • /id/1?id=1 -> should return 1
      • Query beside name maybe not need to be extracted and is optional
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: text/plain, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  3. Body
    • [POST] /json
    • Mirror body to response
    • Server MUST parse body to JSON and serialize back to string
    • For the benchmark, the request body will be sent as: { "hello": "world" }
    • Expected response: { "hello": "world" }
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: application/json, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8.

requirement

  • The framework must at-least has latest published in less than 9 month otherwise will be classified as unmaintained and removed unless is an industry standard (Express).

Prerequistes

Run Test

bun benchmark

Dump result will be available at results/[benchmark-name].txt

Benchmark Condition

This benchmark is tested under the following condition:

  • Windows 11 under WSL Debian
  • Intel I7-13700K, DDR5 32GB 5600MHz
  • Windows 11 22H2 build 22631.3527
  • Debian GNU/Linux 11 (Bullseye), kernel: 5.15.146.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2
  • Bun 1.1.21
  • Node 22.4.1
  • Deno 1.45.5

Tested on 2 Aug 2024 20:51 (GMT+7)

Results

These results are measured in req/s:

Framework Runtime Average Ping Query Body
uws node 470,283.033 579,241.34 540,931.67 290,676.09
bun bun 303,082.47 361,088.16 300,257.38 247,901.87
byte bun 284,171.743 340,490.06 275,638.49 236,386.68
vixeny bun 277,568.127 336,707.48 271,701.32 224,295.58
elysia bun 275,665.277 334,331.85 269,568.48 223,095.5
hyper-express node 273,175.393 349,533.48 273,690.63 196,302.07
bun-web-standard bun 254,588.523 310,817.98 239,556.54 213,391.05
nhttp bun 246,952.23 338,598.01 228,187.38 174,071.3
wobe bun 234,983.597 256,182.35 239,943.25 208,825.19
hono bun 208,169.02 254,363.26 211,471.54 158,672.26
nbit bun 164,299.853 240,314.21 178,346.8 74,238.55
hono deno 141,059.907 183,192.69 140,039.87 99,947.16
h3 node 109,437.953 123,180.18 109,246.35 95,887.33
oak deno 69,362.327 80,083.16 68,659.99 59,343.83
fastify node 59,127.653 76,305.7 67,472.19 33,605.07
acorn deno 57,628.73 70,492.97 53,660.26 48,732.96
oak bun 53,758.663 58,385.95 52,499.68 50,390.36
hono node 51,533.55 66,602.43 60,854.6 27,143.62
koa node 46,436.243 52,077.58 48,744.18 38,486.97
express bun 40,121.71 46,055.12 38,851.63 35,458.38
express node 18,844.29 20,300.52 18,752.87 17,479.48

See more detail in results

Notice

I highly recommended testing this benchmark on your machine yourself as performance in likely to vary between machine.

About

Compare throughput benchmark from various Bun HTTP framework

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published