Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

/f perms taking priority over /f owner #109

Closed
iMaarten opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

/f perms taking priority over /f owner #109

iMaarten opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@iMaarten
Copy link

If you use /f owner on chunks /f perms take priority making /f owner completely useless

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Give faction players access to building/destroying
  2. Use /f owner on a claim
  3. Break block on account that has build/destroy f perms

If /f owner should take priority over /f perms at all times

  • Spigot Version: Paperspigot 1.12.2
  • Factions Version: v1.6.9.5-U0.2.1-RC-1.6-BETA
@iMaarten iMaarten added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 25, 2019
@SvenjaReissaus
Copy link
Contributor

Before proceeding on taking any further actions on this issue. Please describe the following.
In the case, Faction Ownership becomes the higher (besides Faction Admin/Leadership) permission towards a chunk, how would the other permissions interact within this behavior? Explaining as follow:

  • Faction Leader, being the higher permission on the hierarchy: Can add, remove, edit entities on every faction claimed land, regardless of any other permission.
  • Faction Ownership, being the second permission on the hierarchy: Can add, remove, edit entities within a chunk that has previously been declared as Owned by the current user, regardless of this user permissions, and also, preventing others to interact, regardless of their applied permissions, but this does not affect faction leaders.
  • Default Faction Permissions, being the last permission on the hierarchy: Can add, remove, edit entities within the whole faction, able to execute this operations based on the given permissions, on every faction claimed land.
  1. Will Default Faction Permissions be totally useless within Faction Owned land?
  2. Will Faction Leaders be able to assign special permissions, to bypass Faction Ownership protection, without giving full Faction Ownership?
  3. How can you manage Faction Land, if only faction owners will be able to interact with it?
  4. Are Faction Owners supposed to give permissions to specific players to interact within the owned land?

@iMaarten
Copy link
Author

Current implementation on dev builds seems good

@Driftay
Copy link
Contributor

Driftay commented Mar 13, 2019

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants