Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: improve resolution of dependent parameter defaults #3005

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Close #2997

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Needs a test.

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member Author

See #2997 (comment). I'm not sure why this fixes the issue, just that it does. So the only test relies on a specific system with a specific initial value which doesn't seem robust.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Might as well make an integration test of it.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

We should split the interface 1 tests so the times are shorter zzzz

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 7eb5354 into SciML:master Sep 2, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal deleted the as/autodiff-defaults branch September 2, 2024 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Autodiff fails mysteriously with well-defined nested defaults
2 participants