Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove skip_biggus from unit/fileformats/test_rules.py #2459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2017

Conversation

lbdreyer
Copy link
Member

@lbdreyer lbdreyer commented Mar 24, 2017

I have updated this PR so it only deals with the removal of the biggus skipper from:
unit/fileformats/test_rules.py

@lbdreyer lbdreyer added the dask label Mar 24, 2017
@lbdreyer lbdreyer added this to the dask milestone Mar 24, 2017
@lbdreyer lbdreyer changed the title Remove more skip biggus tests WIP Remove more skip biggus tests Mar 24, 2017
@lbdreyer lbdreyer changed the title WIP Remove more skip biggus tests [WIP] Remove more skip biggus tests Mar 24, 2017
@lbdreyer lbdreyer changed the title [WIP] Remove more skip biggus tests Remove skip_biggus from unit/fileformats/test_rules.py Apr 5, 2017
field = mock.Mock()
field.core_data = mock.Mock()
# Add a compute attribute so that the data will be treated as lazy.
field.core_data.compute = None
Copy link
Member

@DPeterK DPeterK May 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I don't understand why the mock object needs to pretend to be lazy (the test runs just fine without this line). I also don't see this line as a deal-breaker, though...

@DPeterK DPeterK merged commit 7656d9d into SciTools:dask May 15, 2017
@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: dask, v2.0 Aug 2, 2017
@lbdreyer lbdreyer deleted the skip_biggus_tests_0 branch July 23, 2018 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants