-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(3.3.2) The message #rfc2965String is sent but not implemented in GemStone 3.4.3 #1115
Comments
Hmmm, things are a bit more complicated:
Since there are no tests for #addCookieRFC2965:toStream: it might make sense to simply remove the method completely? @jbrichau or @marschall, do you have any light to shed on this? |
Okay ... the GemStone tests are now all failing with SentButNotImplemented errors, so we can avoid these in the future ... |
It seems that https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2965 was obsoleted by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265 ... so it seems to be appropriate the use the #rfc6265String message, but I'm also inclined to change the name of WAFastCGIAdaptor>>addCookieRFC2965:toStream: to WAFastCGIAdaptor>>addCookieRFC6265:toStream: and have #addCookieRFC2965:toStream: call #addCookieRFC6265:toStream: ... I'll make these changes and get the tests passing, open a pull request and then let you guys make the final decision... |
Just did a local test run where I check for sent but not implemented as well as undefined globals and it turned up the fact that #rfc2965String is sent but not implemented ... probably should add the
sent but not implemented
andundefined globals
tests to at least the GemStone tests while we're addressing this missing method ...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: