Rules breaking the code in .erb files

[RichardsonWTR]

I think this gem assumes that every block of Ruby in a .erb file is a different Ruby file.
In my case, I've explicitly disabled some rules, to make this gem not break my code.

       Layout/InitialIndentation:
        Enabled: false # This rule removes the "<%" e "<%="  from the code, if enabled.
      Layout/TrailingEmptyLines:
        Enabled: false
      Layout/TrailingWhitespace:
        Enabled: false  # This rule removes the "<%" e "<%="  from the code, if enabled.
      Layout/LeadingEmptyLines:
        Enabled: false

I suggest 3 options for this:

• These rules should be placed in the readme for ease of acess, telling the users to disable them
• These rules should be disabled by the erb lint gem
• The erb lint gem souldn't treat every block of Ruby code as a different Ruby file.

[RichardsonWTR]

Related to #189

[boardfish]

In addition, it's also a good idea to disable these cops:

      # Enabling this adds a frozen string literal magic comment to every block.
      Style/FrozenStringLiteralComment:
        Enabled: false
      # erb_lint reports errors with this cop.
      Style/MultilineTernaryOperator:
        Enabled: false
      # False flags for view files. ViewComponents should never see this, though, as they should never need to assign in a view.
      Lint/UselessAssignment:
        Exclude:
          - "app/views/**/*"
      # Empty blocks have utility in views, e.g. for resetting content_for and
      # rendering slots without args.
      Lint/EmptyBlock:
        Enabled: false

[boardfish]

I think it makes sense to have these cops (besides maybe the Lint cops) disabled by default from within the gem.

[dtgay]

Seems like there might be some breaking behavior related to this if someone writes a comment with <% # The comment %> instead of the more-appropriate <%# The comment %>.

ShalI I file this here or open a new issue?:

[boardfish]

I'd hazard a guess that ties in with the need for this rule to be disabled:

Layout/InitialIndentation:
  Enabled: false # This rule removes the "<%" e "<%="  from the code, if enabled.

[dtgay]

Hm, looks like I had that one disabled. Interestingly it was only on this line and one other, both comment lines where the author put a space betwixt the % and #. Something to keep an eye out for, I suppose.