Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure predeploy deploy timeouts actually raise a timeout error, not … #874

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 22, 2022

Conversation

timothysmith0609
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, the Predeploying priority resources phase can only raise a FatalDeploymentError. This is causing some pain during cluster bootstrap, as some priority resources are triggering timeout conditions. I don't see why we shouldn't add the ability for this phase to timeout, so I've added it, here.

@timothysmith0609 timothysmith0609 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2022 16:19
@timothysmith0609 timothysmith0609 requested review from JamesOwenHall and jpfourny and removed request for a team February 18, 2022 16:19
Copy link
Contributor

@jpfourny jpfourny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. This will require a krane bump in gkrane-config image to rollout. Let me know if you want me to take care of that for you.

Copy link
Contributor

@jpfourny jpfourny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still looks 👍

@timothysmith0609 timothysmith0609 merged commit 6faf486 into master Feb 22, 2022
@timothysmith0609 timothysmith0609 deleted the crd_timeout_should_fail_as_timeout branch February 22, 2022 14:13
@timothysmith0609
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will require a krane bump in gkrane-config image to rollout. Let me know if you want me to take care of that for you.

I think we want to capture #873 in the next update so we don't need to bump the version just yet

@stefanmb stefanmb mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants