Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Landau MPV and FWHM #3

Closed
DavidLP opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Landau MPV and FWHM #3

DavidLP opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
question

Comments

@DavidLP
Copy link
Collaborator

DavidLP commented Jun 21, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Via E-Mail it was asked how to determine the MPV and the FWHM.
DavidLP added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2016
@DavidLP
ENH: add FWHM and MPV determination example, addressing #3
b0d54ba
@DavidLP
Copy link
Collaborator Author

DavidLP commented Jun 21, 2016

To the knowledge of the author the MPV and the FWHM cannot be directly deduced from the the function parameters (A, mu, eta). But of cause it can be determined numercally as shown in the plot example.

@DavidLP DavidLP closed this as completed Jun 21, 2016
@DavidLP
Copy link
Collaborator Author

DavidLP commented Jun 21, 2016

FWHM is close to eta * 4.

@DavidLP
Copy link
Collaborator Author

DavidLP commented Sep 7, 2016

The function is now redefined from (A, mu, eta) --> (A, mpv, eta) to be able to deduce MPV errors from fits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@DavidLP