Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 🐛 user reaction callback provides incorrect message when user re… #166

Conversation

apurva010
Copy link
Collaborator

…act on any message

Description

Checklist

  • The title of my PR starts with a Conventional Commit prefix (fix:, feat:, docs: etc).
  • I have followed the Contributor Guide when preparing my PR.
  • I have updated/added tests for ALL new/updated/fixed functionality.
  • I have updated/added relevant documentation in docs and added dartdoc comments with ///.
  • I have updated/added relevant examples in examples or docs.

Breaking Change?

  • Yes, this PR is a breaking change.
  • No, this PR is not a breaking change.

Related Issues

Closes #165

@apurva010 apurva010 force-pushed the fix/issue_165_user_reaction_callback_provide_incorrect_message branch 5 times, most recently from 9fa73e8 to 93012a5 Compare May 21, 2024 04:05
…user react on any message

- Update user reaction callback when user react on any message callback provides reacted emoji and message object that contains same reacted emoji in reaction emoji list.
@apurva010 apurva010 force-pushed the fix/issue_165_user_reaction_callback_provide_incorrect_message branch from 93012a5 to fb24ac1 Compare May 22, 2024 06:59
@aditya-css aditya-css merged commit 327c19e into main May 22, 2024
@aditya-css aditya-css deleted the fix/issue_165_user_reaction_callback_provide_incorrect_message branch May 22, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

userReactionCallback provides message object in which reaction list is not correct.
2 participants