Option to omit only the source link #489
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
isnt this achieved by https://github.com/SimonCropp/MarkdownSnippets#omitsnippetlinks ? |
|
If I use |
|
thanks. i will deploy this now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a feature request to omit the source link but keep the snippet anchor. For some reason
Tfsdon't work for Azure DevOps (The format on DevOps is&line=26&lineEnd=30&lineStartColumn=1&lineEndColumn=1&lineStyle=plain&_a=contentsbutTfsgets escaped to%26line%3D3%26lineEnd%3D24) and since I don't really know how to fix that bug at least it would be nice to hide it :)I tried to update
readme.mdbut I got this exception:Might be because I managed to checkout a lot of files with the wrong line ending (at least that's why I guess a lot of files are marked as modified without me touching anything)...
If you approve of this PR, could you try to update
readme.mdfor me?