fix[chat]: metadata and filtering error margins #22
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.1.2 #22 +/- ##
==================================================
- Coverage 51.35% 51.33% -0.03%
==================================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1694 1722 +28
==================================================
+ Hits 870 884 +14
- Misses 824 838 +14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
gventuri
force-pushed
the
fix/chat_metadata_issue
branch
from
5ba7f74 to
ffaf271
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve enhancements across several Python files in the backend application. Key updates include the introduction of a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ChatService
participant Database
Client->>ChatService: Send chat request
ChatService->>Database: Process request
Database-->>ChatService: Return response
ChatService->>ChatService: Clean response text
ChatService-->>Client: Send cleaned response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
backend/app/utils.py (1)
32-39: LGTM: Newclean_textfunction added with room for enhancements.The
clean_textfunction effectively removes newlines and punctuation from the input text. However, consider the following suggestions for potential improvements:
- Handle multiple consecutive spaces that might result from newline removal.
- Add an option to preserve certain punctuation marks if needed in some use cases.
- Consider handling other whitespace characters like tabs.
Example implementation incorporating these suggestions:
def clean_text(text, preserve_punctuation=None): # Remove newline and tab characters text = re.sub(r'[\n\t]+', ' ', text) # Remove multiple spaces text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text) # Remove punctuation, optionally preserving specified characters if preserve_punctuation: punct_to_remove = ''.join(c for c in string.punctuation if c not in preserve_punctuation) else: punct_to_remove = string.punctuation text = text.translate(str.maketrans("", "", punct_to_remove)) return text.strip()This implementation uses regex for more comprehensive whitespace handling and adds an optional parameter to preserve specific punctuation if needed.
backend/app/processing/file_preprocessing.py (1)
120-120: LGTM: Consistent use of asset_id in segmentation submissionThe change from
asset_content.idtoasset_content.asset_idis correct and consistent with the updates in theprocess_segmentationfunction. This ensures that the proper identifier is passed to the segmentation process.For even better clarity, consider renaming the
asset_contentvariable to simplyassetsince we're now usingasset_id. This would make the line read:asset.asset_id,This change would make it clearer that we're dealing with the asset's ID rather than potentially confusing it with the content's ID.
backend/app/api/v1/projects.py (5)
72-75: Approve formatting change and suggest error message improvementThe reformatting of the HTTPException improves readability. However, consider enhancing the error message to provide more specific information:
raise HTTPException( status_code=500, detail=f"An error occurred while retrieving projects: {str(e)}. Please try again later.", )This change would help with debugging by including the specific error message in the response.
102-105: Approve formatting change and suggest error message improvementThe reformatting of the HTTPException improves readability. However, consider enhancing the error message to provide more specific information:
raise HTTPException( status_code=500, detail=f"An error occurred while retrieving the project: {str(e)}. Please try again later.", )This change would help with debugging by including the specific error message in the response.
140-143: Approve formatting change and suggest error message improvementThe reformatting of the HTTPException improves readability. However, consider enhancing the error message to provide more specific information:
raise HTTPException( status_code=500, detail=f"An error occurred while retrieving assets: {str(e)}. Please try again later.", )This change would help with debugging by including the specific error message in the response.
357-359: Approve formatting changes and suggest error message improvementThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability. The 404 error message is appropriate and specific. However, consider enhancing the 500 error message to provide more specific information:
raise HTTPException( status_code=500, detail=f"An error occurred while updating the project: {str(e)}. Please try again later.", )This change would help with debugging by including the specific error message in the response.
Also applies to: 372-375
383-385: Approve formatting changes and suggest error message improvementThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability. The 404 error message is appropriate and specific. However, consider enhancing the 500 error message to provide more specific information:
raise HTTPException( status_code=500, detail=f"An error occurred while deleting the project: {str(e)}. Please try again later.", )This change would help with debugging by including the specific error message in the response.
Also applies to: 406-409
backend/app/processing/process_queue.py (4)
Line range hint
205-218: Fix indentation ofreturn wrapperinhandle_exceptionsdecoratorThe
return wrapperstatement on line 218 is incorrectly indented inside thewrapperfunction. It should be dedented to correctly return thewrapperfunction fromhandle_exceptions.Apply this diff to fix the indentation:
def handle_exceptions(func): @wraps(func) def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): try: return func(*args, **kwargs) except CreditLimitExceededException: logger.error("Credit limit exceeded") raise except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Error in {func.__name__}: {str(e)}") logger.error(traceback.format_exc()) raise - return wrapper + return wrapper
Line range hint
221-252: Redundant exception handling insideextractive_summary_processThe
extractive_summary_processfunction is decorated with@handle_exceptions, which already handles exceptions and logs errors. The internaltry-exceptblock inside this function may be redundant unless it's intended to return default values on exceptions instead of raising them. This could lead to inconsistencies in error handling.Consider removing the internal
try-exceptblock to rely on the decorator for exception handling, or clarify the intended behavior if the function should return default values on exceptions.
Line range hint
276-296: Ensurepdf_contentis correctly populatedThe
pdf_contentvariable is initialized to an empty string and may remain empty if the conditions are not met, potentially leading to issues when passed to theextract_datafunction.Ensure that
pdf_contentis assigned a valid value or handle the case when it is empty:if not pdf_content: pdf_content = ( "\n".join(asset_content.content["content"]) if asset_content.content else None ) +if not pdf_content: + logger.error("PDF content is empty. Verify asset content and process details.") + # Handle the empty content case appropriately
Line range hint
276-296: Add@handle_exceptionsdecorator toextract_processThe
extract_processfunction is not decorated with@handle_exceptions, unlikeextractive_summary_process. For consistency and to ensure exceptions are properly handled and logged, consider adding the decorator.Apply this diff to add the decorator:
+@handle_exceptions def extract_process(api_key, process, process_step, asset_content): pdf_content = ""
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- backend/app/api/v1/chat.py (3 hunks)
- backend/app/api/v1/projects.py (17 hunks)
- backend/app/processing/file_preprocessing.py (4 hunks)
- backend/app/processing/process_queue.py (11 hunks)
- backend/app/utils.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (16)
backend/app/utils.py (2)
6-6: LGTM: Appropriate import added for text processing.The addition of the
stringmodule import is correct and necessary for the newclean_textfunction. It's properly placed with other imports at the top of the file.
Line range hint
1-41: Overall: Positive addition to the utils module.The changes in this file enhance the functionality of the utils module by adding a text cleaning capability. The new
clean_textfunction and its associated import are well-integrated into the existing file structure without affecting other functions. This addition could be beneficial in various parts of the project where text preprocessing is required.To ensure the new function is used effectively:
- Consider adding unit tests for the
clean_textfunction to verify its behavior with different input types.- Update the module's documentation (if it exists) to include information about the new function.
- Review other parts of the project where this text cleaning functionality could be useful and consider implementing it there.
To verify the potential usage of this new function, we can search for patterns in the codebase where text cleaning might be beneficial:
This will help identify areas where the new
clean_textfunction could be applied to improve text processing throughout the project.✅ Verification successful
Integrate
clean_textFunction in Identified LocationsReplace the existing text processing in
backend/app/utils.pywith the newclean_textfunction:
Before:
text = text.replace("\n", " ") text = text.translate(str.maketrans("", "", string.punctuation))After:
text = clean_text(text)This change eliminates redundant code and centralizes text cleaning logic, improving maintainability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential use cases of the clean_text function echo "Potential use cases for clean_text function:" rg -i "text\s*=|text\.strip|text\.replace" --type pyLength of output: 443
backend/app/processing/file_preprocessing.py (4)
25-25: LGTM: Function signature update improves clarityThe change from
asset_content_idtoasset_idin the function signature is a good improvement. It more accurately represents the parameter's purpose and aligns with the rest of the codebase.
55-55: LGTM: Consistent error loggingThe error logging message has been correctly updated to use
asset_idinstead ofasset_content_id. This change maintains consistency with the other updates in the file and ensures that error messages accurately reflect the current parameter naming.
Line range hint
25-120: Summary: Consistent renaming improves clarity, verify impact on other modulesThe changes in this file consistently rename
asset_content_idtoasset_id, which improves clarity and aligns with the intended use of the asset identifier. While these changes look good within this file, it's important to ensure that this renaming doesn't negatively impact other parts of the system that might expectasset_content_id.To ensure that this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies in other parts of the codebase, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of 'asset_content_id' in Python files # This will help identify any places where the old naming is still in use rg -t py 'asset_content_id' . # Search for uses of 'asset_id' to ensure it's being used correctly rg -t py 'asset_id' .Review the results to ensure that:
- There are no unexpected occurrences of
asset_content_id.- All uses of
asset_idare correct and consistent with this change.
28-28: LGTM: Consistent parameter usage throughout the functionThe changes from
asset_content_idtoasset_idare consistently applied throughout theprocess_segmentationfunction. This maintains the logical integrity of the function while improving clarity.To ensure complete consistency, let's verify that no instances of
asset_content_idremain in this file:Also applies to: 39-39, 50-50, 59-59
✅ Verification successful
LGTM:
asset_content_idsuccessfully replaced withasset_idinfile_preprocessing.pyAll instances of
asset_content_idhave been fully replaced withasset_idinfile_preprocessing.py, ensuring consistency within the function and enhancing code clarity.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that 'asset_content_id' has been completely replaced rg 'asset_content_id' backend/app/processing/file_preprocessing.pyLength of output: 9761
backend/app/api/v1/projects.py (9)
83-85: Approve formatting changeThe reformatting of the HTTPException improves readability while maintaining appropriate error messaging for a 404 Not Found error. This change is good and doesn't require further modifications.
153-155: Approve formatting changesThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability while maintaining appropriate and specific error messaging. These changes are good and don't require further modifications. They provide clear information about the nature of the errors, which is helpful for debugging and user feedback.
Also applies to: 165-166, 173-173, 209-212
221-223: Approve formatting changesThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability while maintaining appropriate and specific error messaging. These changes are good and don't require further modifications. They provide clear information about the nature of the errors, which is helpful for debugging and user feedback.
Also applies to: 226-229, 233-236, 274-277
287-288: Approve formatting changesThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability while maintaining appropriate and specific error messaging. These changes are good and don't require further modifications. They provide clear information about the nature of the errors, which is helpful for debugging and user feedback.
Also applies to: 295-298, 309-312
417-419: Approve formatting changesThe reformatting of the HTTPExceptions improves readability while maintaining appropriate and specific error messaging. These changes are good and don't require further modifications. They provide clear information about the nature of the errors, which is helpful for debugging and user feedback.
Also applies to: 423-426, 429-432, 465-468
452-455: Approve logging format changeThe reformatting of the logging statement improves readability while maintaining appropriate and specific information about the deleted asset. This change is good and doesn't require further modifications.
438-438: Approve addition of project_id to asset_infoThe addition of
project_idto theasset_infodictionary is a good improvement. It provides more context about the asset being deleted, which can be valuable for logging, debugging, or potential future use cases where project association needs to be tracked.
451-451: Approve addition of empty line for improved readabilityThe addition of an empty line after the soft deletion of the asset improves code readability by clearly separating the deletion logic from the subsequent logging statement. This change enhances the overall structure and readability of the function without affecting its behavior.
Line range hint
1-468: Overall assessment of changesThe modifications in this file primarily focus on improving code readability, error handling, and logging. These changes are positive and contribute to better maintainability and debugging capabilities. Key points:
- Exception handling has been reformatted consistently throughout the file, improving readability.
- Error messages are generally more specific, aiding in troubleshooting.
- Logging has been improved with more detailed information.
- The default page size for
get_projectshas been increased, which may have performance implications.While the changes are generally good, consider implementing the suggested improvements to error messages in some of the 500 error responses to provide even more specific error information.
These changes represent a step forward in code quality and maintainability.
backend/app/api/v1/chat.py (1)
96-96: Good use ofclean_textfor consistent text matchingApplying
clean_textto thecontentensures that text comparisons are handled consistently, which improves the reliability of subsequent operations likefind.
…-AI/panda-etl into fix/chat_metadata_issue
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor