Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix[csv_display]: on process display only when process completed #40

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

ArslanSaleem
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArslanSaleem ArslanSaleem commented Oct 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the File component to only render when the process status is completed, ensuring users can download files only after the process is finished.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved control flow for file downloads, preventing access when the process is not complete.

@ArslanSaleem ArslanSaleem requested a review from gventuri October 25, 2024 08:50
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a conditional rendering mechanism for the File component within the Process function in the specified file. The File component is now rendered only if the process status is ProcessStatus.COMPLETED, ensuring that the file download option is available exclusively upon the completion of the process. Other aspects of the component, such as state management and error handling, remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/page.tsx Conditional rendering added for the File component based on process status.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where processes flow,
A file waits for the completed show.
Only when tasks are done,
The download can be fun!
Hooray for the changes, let’s all cheer,
For a smoother path, we hold dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ArslanSaleem ArslanSaleem changed the title Fix/csv display for process Fix[csv_display]: on process display only when process completed Oct 25, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.10%. Comparing base (00e255d) to head (888d074).
Report is 2 commits behind head on release/v0.3.2.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release/v0.3.2      #40   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage           60.10%   60.10%           
===============================================
  Files                  37       37           
  Lines                1717     1717           
===============================================
  Hits                 1032     1032           
  Misses                685      685           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c614a6c and 888d074.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/page.tsx (2)

148-157: LGTM! Conditional rendering looks good.

The implementation correctly ensures the File component is only shown when the process is completed, fixing the CSV display issue.


154-154: Verify the CSV route implementation.

The code redirects to /projects/${projectId}/processes/${process.id}/csv. Let's ensure this route exists and handles the CSV download correctly.

✅ Verification successful

CSV route and download functionality are properly implemented

The verification shows that:

  • The CSV route exists at frontend/src/app/(editor)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/csv/page.tsx
  • The implementation includes both CSV preview and download functionality:
    • Fetches CSV data from /get-csv endpoint
    • Provides download capability via /download-csv endpoint
    • Includes proper error handling and loading states
    • Uses Papa Parse for CSV parsing and preview
    • Implements proper file download mechanism with correct filename
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CSV route is properly implemented

# Test 1: Look for the CSV route definition
echo "Checking for CSV route definition..."
rg -l "processes/\[processId\]/csv" app/

# Test 2: Look for CSV download handler implementation
echo "Checking for CSV download handler..."
rg -l "csv.*download" app/

Length of output: 327


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CSV route is properly implemented with corrected paths

# Test 1: Look for the CSV route definition
echo "Checking for CSV route definition..."
rg -l "processes/\[processId\]/csv" frontend/src/

# Test 2: Look for CSV download handler implementation
echo "Checking for CSV download handler..."
rg -l "csv.*download" frontend/src/

# Test 3: Look for any CSV-related route or handler
echo "Checking for any CSV-related functionality..."
rg -A 5 "csv" frontend/src/app/

Length of output: 8289

@gventuri gventuri merged commit 2ded87d into release/v0.3.2 Oct 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@gventuri gventuri deleted the fix/csv_display_for_process branch October 25, 2024 09:17
gventuri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
* fix[csv]: display csv table only in case of process is completed

* remove leftover
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants