Fix a bug when first added node is loop type #824
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…src/' <!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN --> | 🚀 | This description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit e06710e5038a74a05efaa9f823e3e642d129558c | |--------|--------| fix: correct ID generation for node adder in loop node in `FlowRenderer.tsx` ### Summary: Fixes ID generation bug for node adder in `FlowRenderer.tsx` when first node is a 'loop'. **Key points**: - **Bug Fix**: - Fixes ID generation for node adder in `addNode()` in `FlowRenderer.tsx` when the first node is of type 'loop'. - Uses `nanoid()` for unique ID instead of concatenated string. ---- Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev) <!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN -->
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 335c8c1 in 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_X0xv2XWTx6ao5udZ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 335c8c1 in 36 seconds
More details
- Looked at
14lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. skyvern-frontend/src/routes/workflows/editor/FlowRenderer.tsx:176
- Draft comment:
Consider usingnanoid()for generating the ID of the nodeAdder here as well to ensure uniqueness, similar to the change made for loop nodes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting a change that has already been implemented in the diff. The ID for thenodeAdderis already being generated usingnanoid(), so the comment is not necessary.
I might be missing the context of other parts of the code wherenanoid()is not used, but the comment is specifically about the change in the diff, which is already resolved.
The comment is about the specific change in the diff, and since the change has been made, the comment is not needed.
The comment is not needed because the suggested change has already been implemented in the diff.
Workflow ID: wflow_dijP6SJIbpFGGXMQ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix: correct ID generation for node adder in loop node in
FlowRenderer.tsxSummary:
Fixes ID generation bug for node adder in
FlowRenderer.tsxusingnanoid()for unique IDs.Key points:
FlowRenderer.tsxwhen the first node is a 'loop'.nanoid()for unique ID instead of concatenated string.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev