-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
236 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
236 changes: 236 additions & 0 deletions
236
projects/Closure/85/com/google/javascript/jscomp/UnreachableCodeElimination.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright 2008 The Closure Compiler Authors. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package com.google.javascript.jscomp; | ||
|
||
import com.google.common.base.Preconditions; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.ControlFlowGraph.Branch; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.NodeTraversal.AbstractPostOrderCallback; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.NodeTraversal.ScopedCallback; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.graph.GraphReachability; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.graph.DiGraph.DiGraphEdge; | ||
import com.google.javascript.jscomp.graph.DiGraph.DiGraphNode; | ||
import com.google.javascript.rhino.Node; | ||
import com.google.javascript.rhino.Token; | ||
|
||
import java.util.Deque; | ||
import java.util.LinkedList; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.logging.Level; | ||
import java.util.logging.Logger; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Removes dead code from a parse tree. The kinds of dead code that this pass | ||
* removes are: | ||
* - Any code following a return statement, such as the <code>alert</code> | ||
* call in: <code>if (x) { return; alert('unreachable'); }</code>. | ||
* - Statements that have no side effects, such as: | ||
* <code>a.b.MyClass.prototype.propertyName;</code> or <code>true;</code>. | ||
* That first kind of statement sometimes appears intentionally, so that | ||
* prototype properties can be annotated using JSDoc without actually | ||
* being initialized. | ||
* | ||
*/ | ||
class UnreachableCodeElimination extends AbstractPostOrderCallback | ||
implements CompilerPass, ScopedCallback { | ||
private static final Logger logger = | ||
Logger.getLogger(UnreachableCodeElimination.class.getName()); | ||
|
||
private final AbstractCompiler compiler; | ||
private final boolean removeNoOpStatements; | ||
|
||
Deque<ControlFlowGraph<Node>> cfgStack = | ||
new LinkedList<ControlFlowGraph<Node>>(); | ||
|
||
ControlFlowGraph<Node> curCfg = null; | ||
|
||
UnreachableCodeElimination(AbstractCompiler compiler, | ||
boolean removeNoOpStatements) { | ||
this.compiler = compiler; | ||
this.removeNoOpStatements = removeNoOpStatements; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void enterScope(NodeTraversal t) { | ||
Scope scope = t.getScope(); | ||
|
||
// Computes the control flow graph. | ||
ControlFlowAnalysis cfa = new ControlFlowAnalysis(compiler, false, false); | ||
cfa.process(null, scope.getRootNode()); | ||
cfgStack.push(curCfg); | ||
curCfg = cfa.getCfg(); | ||
|
||
new GraphReachability<Node, ControlFlowGraph.Branch>(curCfg) | ||
.compute(curCfg.getEntry().getValue()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void exitScope(NodeTraversal t) { | ||
curCfg = cfgStack.pop(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void process(Node externs, Node root) { | ||
NodeTraversal.traverse(compiler, root, this); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void visit(NodeTraversal t, Node n, Node parent) { | ||
if (parent == null) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
if (n.getType() == Token.FUNCTION || n.getType() == Token.SCRIPT) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
DiGraphNode<Node, Branch> gNode = curCfg.getDirectedGraphNode(n); | ||
if (gNode == null) { // Not in CFG. | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
if (gNode.getAnnotation() != GraphReachability.REACHABLE || | ||
(removeNoOpStatements && !NodeUtil.mayHaveSideEffects(n))) { | ||
removeDeadExprStatementSafely(n); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(n); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Tries to remove n if an unconditional branch node (break, continue or | ||
* return) if the target of n is the same as the the follow of n. That is, if | ||
* we remove n, the control flow remains the same. Also if n targets to | ||
* another unconditional branch, this function will recursively try to remove | ||
* the target branch as well. The reason why we want to cascade this removal | ||
* is because we only run this pass once. If we have code such as | ||
* | ||
* break -> break -> break | ||
* | ||
* where all 3 break's are useless. The order of removal matters. When we | ||
* first look at the first break, we see that it branches to the 2nd break. | ||
* However, if we remove the last break, the 2nd break becomes useless and | ||
* finally the first break becomes useless as well. | ||
* | ||
* @return The target of this jump. If the target is also useless jump, | ||
* the target of that useless jump recursively. | ||
*/ | ||
@SuppressWarnings("fallthrough") | ||
private Node tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(Node n) { | ||
/* | ||
* For each of the unconditional branching control flow node, check to see | ||
* if the ControlFlowAnalysis.computeFollowNode of that node is same as | ||
* the branching target. If it is, the branch node is safe to be removed. | ||
* | ||
* This is not as clever as MinimizeExitPoints because it doesn't do any | ||
* if-else conversion but it handles more complicated switch statements | ||
* much nicer. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
// If n is null the target is the end of the function, nothing to do. | ||
if (n == null) { | ||
return n; | ||
} | ||
|
||
DiGraphNode<Node, Branch> gNode = curCfg.getDirectedGraphNode(n); | ||
|
||
if (gNode == null) { | ||
return n; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (n.getParent() == null) { | ||
List<DiGraphEdge<Node,Branch>> outEdges = gNode.getOutEdges(); | ||
if (outEdges.size() == 1) { | ||
return tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(outEdges.get(0).getDestination().getValue()); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
switch (n.getType()) { | ||
case Token.BLOCK: | ||
if (n.hasChildren()) { | ||
Node first = n.getFirstChild(); | ||
return tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(first); | ||
} else { | ||
return tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(ControlFlowAnalysis.computeFollowNode(n)); | ||
} | ||
case Token.RETURN: | ||
if (n.hasChildren()) { | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
case Token.BREAK: | ||
case Token.CONTINUE: | ||
|
||
// We are looking for a control flow changing statement that always | ||
// branches to the same node. If removing it the control flow still | ||
// branches to that same node. It is safe to remove it. | ||
List<DiGraphEdge<Node,Branch>> outEdges = gNode.getOutEdges(); | ||
if (outEdges.size() == 1 && | ||
// If there is a next node, there is no chance this jump is useless. | ||
(n.getNext() == null || n.getNext().getType() == Token.FUNCTION)) { | ||
|
||
Preconditions.checkState(outEdges.get(0).getValue() == Branch.UNCOND); | ||
Node fallThrough = tryRemoveUnconditionalBranching(computeFollowing(n)); | ||
Node nextCfgNode = outEdges.get(0).getDestination().getValue(); | ||
if (nextCfgNode == fallThrough) { | ||
removeDeadExprStatementSafely(n); | ||
return fallThrough; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return n; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private Node computeFollowing(Node n) { | ||
Node next = ControlFlowAnalysis.computeFollowNode(n); | ||
return next; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private void removeDeadExprStatementSafely(Node n) { | ||
Node parent = n.getParent(); | ||
if (n.getType() == Token.EMPTY || | ||
(n.getType() == Token.BLOCK && !n.hasChildren())) { | ||
// Not always trivial to remove, let FoldContants work its magic later. | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
switch (n.getType()) { | ||
// Removing an unreachable DO node is messy because it means we still have | ||
// to execute one iteration. If the DO's body has breaks in the middle, it | ||
// can get even more trickier and code size might actually increase. | ||
case Token.DO: | ||
return; | ||
|
||
case Token.BLOCK: | ||
// BLOCKs are used in several ways including wrapping CATCH blocks in TRYs | ||
if (parent.getType() == Token.TRY) { | ||
if (NodeUtil.isTryCatchNodeContainer(n)) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case Token.CATCH: | ||
Node tryNode = parent.getParent(); | ||
NodeUtil.maybeAddFinally(tryNode); | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
NodeUtil.redeclareVarsInsideBranch(n); | ||
compiler.reportCodeChange(); | ||
if (logger.isLoggable(Level.FINE)) { | ||
logger.fine("Removing " + n.toString()); | ||
} | ||
NodeUtil.removeChild(n.getParent(), n); | ||
} | ||
} |