Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update and improve zh_TW Traditional Chinese locale #2030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Update and improve zh_TW Traditional Chinese locale.

cc #646 #987 #1036 #1438

Checklist

  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have read the section Add New Translation Tags (for new translation tags only)

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Translation Verification Summary

📋 Checking with the file messages_en_GB.properties from the main-branch - Checking the pr-branch

🗂️ Checking File: messages_zh_TW.properties...

  • Test 1 Status: ✅ Passed
  • Test 2 Status: ✅ Passed

✅ Overall Check Status: Success

@Frooodle
Copy link
Member

Appreciate the work on this, as a non Chinese speaker it is hard to validate other peoples work!

@Frooodle Frooodle merged commit 4132e5b into Stirling-Tools:main Oct 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@PeterDaveHello PeterDaveHello deleted the zh_TW branch October 18, 2024 17:32
PeterDaveHello added a commit to PeterDaveHelloKitchen/Stirling-PDF that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2024
This is a small follow-up to Stirling-Tools#2030, but it will significantly improve the user experience for Traditional Chinese users.
Frooodle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2024
This is a small follow-up to #2030, but it will significantly improve the user experience for Traditional Chinese users.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants