Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: add orbiter bridge #205

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

chore: add orbiter bridge #205

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

tadejpodrekar
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@tadejpodrekar tadejpodrekar self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
@changeset-bot changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7bf3f1d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@martines3000 martines3000 merged commit b9991d4 into develop Oct 30, 2024
1 check passed
@martines3000 martines3000 deleted the chore/orbiter-bridge branch October 30, 2024 12:09
lutralabs-bot added a commit to lutralabs/swaylend-monorepo that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
@lutralabs-bot
chore: add orbiter bridge (Swaylend#205)
a73b3e6
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@martines3000 martines3000 martines3000 approved these changes

@pseudobun pseudobun Awaiting requested review from pseudobun

Assignees

@tadejpodrekar tadejpodrekar

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tadejpodrekar @martines3000