Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

coverage: improve coverage of TimerMock #265

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 26, 2023
Merged

coverage: improve coverage of TimerMock #265

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 26, 2023

Conversation

vbreuss
Copy link
Member

@vbreuss vbreuss commented Feb 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Improve test coverage and simplify implementation of TimerMock

@vbreuss vbreuss added the coverage Additional tests for edge cases or improvement of test coverage label Feb 26, 2023
@vbreuss vbreuss self-assigned this Feb 26, 2023
@vbreuss vbreuss merged commit d70e29c into main Feb 26, 2023
@vbreuss vbreuss deleted the topic/vb/improve-timermock-coverage branch February 26, 2023 10:10
@github-actions
Copy link

Please check the attached Stryker dashboards on the build pipeline.

@vbreuss vbreuss mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2023
Merged
vbreuss added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2023
@vbreuss @vbtig
refactor: remove brittle Timer implementation (#267)
3b1a3cb 
The timer implementation is not yet OK, as it is quite brittle on the
build system.

This will reset the changes from
- #259 
- #263 
- #265

Co-authored-by: Valentin Breuß <v.breuss@tig.at>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@vbreuss vbreuss

Labels
coverage Additional tests for edge cases or improvement of test coverage
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vbreuss @vbtig